similar to: Maybe OT : strange wildcard behaviour

Spam Sent on the Sprint? Now Network from my BlackBerry? -----Original Message----- From: centos-request at centos.org Sender: centos-bounces at centos.org Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 12:00:02 To: <centos at centos.org> Reply-To: centos at centos.org Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 69, Issue 24 Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World

Hi CentOS4.2 - Is it possible to have an older version of gcc as well as the one that ships with this OS? I need to compile aspseek to run on this distro but it seems to only like older gcc's any ideas?

Hi all I would like to install the minimal level of Centos, with yum & selinux on my servers during the basic install from CD with Anaconda and then use yum to install whatever application is major on that server, so that yum installs its dependencies only, thus keeping to the target of installing only what is needed on a server. Please advise pros/cons of this approach and how to do it. I

Currently we have RH7.3 with compiler gcc 2.96.x My mission, should I choose to accept it, involves moving our embedded application to CentOS 4.1 with gcc 3.x Problem is that about 1/2 million lines of code that gcc 2.96 accepts gives fatal fits to the gcc 3.x compiler from CentOS 4.1 I don't know how many fatal fits, as some disguise others etc. "Can't find register to

After reading through the various SELinux threads, I really became quite perturbed. I mean, really quite perturbed. As an IT Director (and the entire IT department, currently), if I were hiring a sysadmin I know for a fact that someone whose first response to a question on why something doesn't work is 'turn it off' would not get a job here. Neither would a sysadmin with as much

I can't choose LILO as boot loader anymore in the install process? And what is the advantages in GRUP vs. LILO that are so great that LILO has been deleted all together? One big disadvantages when forced to use GRUB is that it is a hassle to make the disks in a RAID1 bootable. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-March/msg05935.html and RAID1 seems pretty useless when it is the

One of my VPS stopped working. After the data centre replaced a disk normal service resumed, then I notices this: CentOS release 5.5 (Final) Kernel 2.6.35.4 on an x86_64 I always thought Centos 5.x would always be on 2.6.18. Any thoughts?

Hello, I have: CentOS4.1 x86_64 directly-attached Infortrend 9TB array QLogic HBA seen as sdb GPT label created in parted I want one single 9TB ext3 partition. I am experiencing crazy behavior from mke2fs / mkfs.ext3 (tried both). If I create partitions in parted up to approx 4,100,000 MB in parted, mkfs.ext3 works great. It lists the right number of blocks and creates a filesystem that fills

Agreed! Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 >>> craigwhite at azapple.com 10/12/05 09:35AM >>> List owners of course have the option to knock people out but are almost always wisest not to use that power except when absolutely necessary and I'm quite certain that it hadn't reached that state.

Is this because the mirrors are busy? I did update to CentOS 4.2 yesterday but now... [root at srv1 file-4.15]# yum install php-devel php-imap Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories dag 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: update failure: repodata/repomd.xml from update: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.

I am getting tons of these messages since I updated to 4.2 Nov 12 12:21:39 srv1 dbus: Can't send to audit system: USER_AVC pid=2839 uid=81 loginuid=-1 message=avc: denied { send_msg } for scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t tcontext=user_u:system_r:initrc_t tclass=dbus Now I can see this process... # ps aux|grep 2839 dbus 2839 0.0 0.3 16168 1888 ? Ssl Nov11 0:13 dbus-

Good day, Been googling about this matter. Afraid I am now confused. Too many options..: for/against/whatever. Some is years ago. Kindly please a step x step manner in which to accomplish to enable mp3 please. Thanks Johan

Hi, I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the software patches. But I get the following error when I try to run 'yum update': Package libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm is not signed and yum update exits without applying any of the patches. I tried clearing the cache and re-running the update

Hi,everybody! When the system boot,there is a problem: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions:line 19 /sbin/consoletype:cannot execute binary file /etc/profile.d/lang.sh:line 46: /sbin/consoletype:cannot execute binary file it cannot boot! How can i fix it? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi List; Anyone know of any good retail or online outlets to but Linux desktops/servers. I would like to acquire another low cost dev box and I refuse to give the M$ chronies any of my money. Thanks for your advice...

What KVMs do you use? I personally like the ConnectPro.

After reading all the problems with the x86-64 update, I'm in a quandry as to update this machine or not. Nothing that I am aware of is broken, and at least everything I use works. This is NOT a production machine, but it does have some important software that needs to run twice daily, and I sure don't want to break things for that. If upgrade is not necessary, how do I go about

Hi List; I see in the 4.2 downloads area the following: [ ] CentOS-4.2-i386-bin1of4.iso 11-Oct-2005 13:07 618M [ ] CentOS-4.2-i386-bin2of4.iso 11-Oct-2005 13:13 635M [ ] CentOS-4.2-i386-bin3of4.iso 11-Oct-2005 13:20 639M [ ] CentOS-4.2-i386-bin4of4.iso 11-Oct-2005 13:22 217M [ ] CentOS-4.2.ServerCD-i386.iso 07-Nov-2005 04:36 558M What is the

List, I've got a process(s) that have been exiting on a signal 11, but not all the time. I suspect it's memory related, and I was wondering, is there any way to tell exactly how much memory a particular process has in use at the point it sigsev's ? I can't sit here and watch top or the system monitor, but thought maybe something might be saved somewhere after the fact.

greetings bryan, did you say that in your experience the /var partition should _not_ be on the extended partition table for "recovery" purposes? - rh