similar to: Mock on 5.5 x86_64 failing with Could not find useradd in chroot, maybe the install failed?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Mock on 5.5 x86_64 failing with Could not find useradd in chroot, maybe the install failed?"

2010 Aug 01
2
/bin/su wont work inside a chroot?
On centos 4 (i386 chroot on an x86_64) it just prompts me for a password. Any suggesstion on where to start looking? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443)
2011 May 14
2
Apache in chroot reporting every client is 16.0.0.0
Not sure where to start on this. I went to examine a log file today and noticed a password protected internal file was being accessed from 16.0.0.0. Upon further review every log entry has the same IP. Accessing apache from localhost also reports 16.0.0.0. Google is not being my friend right now, any advice? Kernel: 2.6.9-89.0.29.Elsmp In the chroot: httpd-suexec-2.0.52-41.ent.7.centos4
2010 Dec 09
4
5.5 x86_64 live cd
In the bang head and repeat mode here. The live usb partition is /dev/sda1 Reboot / power on It auto mounts the /dev/sda2 as ext4 on /mnt/disc/sda2 $ umount /mnt/disc/sda2 $ mkdir /root/foo $ mke2fs /dev/sda2 $ mount /dev/sda2 /root/foo Kernel panic Snip from the kernel panic: ?????? list_del+0xb/0x71 cache_alloc_refill+0xf1/0x186 ext2_fill_super+0x0/0xa37 .... system_call+0x7e/0x83 --
2011 Feb 25
1
[OT] building src rpm on RHEL5 using mock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680144
Does anyone have experience using mock on RHEL5 with the RHN? I use mock easily on Centos, I get errors like /bin/sh not found, useradd not found build failed? messages from it on RHEL w/ RHN. Any suggestions on where to start looking. -Jason Pyeron -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason
2008 Nov 05
1
mock
Does the centos project maintain a copy of mock to install? If not which mock should I install? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333
2010 Jul 07
1
Mock build php i386 from x86_64 issue
[mock at ten-186 ~]$ mock php-5.1.6-27.el5.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while setup build Installing /builddir/build/SRPMS/php-5.1.6-27.src.rpm Building target platforms: i386 Building for target i386 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.23317 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf php-5.1.6 + /bin/gzip
2010 Jul 28
1
efi-app-x86_64 on 5.5?
I am trying to bring in a fedora 13 rpm, when compiliny objcopy is given a target of efi-app-x86_64, when I do a objcopy --info it is not listed. It does list many elf (including 64 bit) and efi-app-ia32 bit Any suggestions, what additional information could I provide. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -
2010 Feb 16
4
Apache bandwidth limiting?
Can this be done with stock centos 4? Or can this even be done with the extras repo? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore,
2014 Dec 04
3
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil > sites with New DoDCAC > > I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved > DADEMS recently? DADMS is a Navy system, but yes Centos is approved for use by DISA. You would
2014 Dec 04
1
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42 > > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant. >
2009 Aug 15
1
Confused about named, chroot, and tmp files.
Any ideas why bind is putting the tmp files in the [chroot]/var/named directory and not in /tmp or /var/tmp? [root at devserver21 chroot]# Aug 15 14:08:21 devserver21 named[5101]: loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf' Aug 15 14:08:21 devserver21 named: named reload succeeded Aug 15 14:08:21 devserver21 named[5101]: dumping master file: tmp-XXXXQ5X9mC: open: permission denied Aug 15
2015 Oct 26
3
[kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: hyperv_synic: Hyper-V SynIC test
Hyper-V SynIC is a Hyper-V synthetic interrupt controller. The test runs on every vCPU and performs the following steps: * read from all Hyper-V SynIC MSR's * setup Hyper-V SynIC evt/msg pages * setup SINT's routing * inject SINT's into destination vCPU by 'hyperv-synic-test-device' * wait for SINT's isr's completion * clear Hyper-V SynIC evt/msg pages and destroy
2015 Oct 26
3
[kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: hyperv_synic: Hyper-V SynIC test
Hyper-V SynIC is a Hyper-V synthetic interrupt controller. The test runs on every vCPU and performs the following steps: * read from all Hyper-V SynIC MSR's * setup Hyper-V SynIC evt/msg pages * setup SINT's routing * inject SINT's into destination vCPU by 'hyperv-synic-test-device' * wait for SINT's isr's completion * clear Hyper-V SynIC evt/msg pages and destroy
2009 Apr 02
17
[OT] Godaddy hell...
Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. Would like them to include http/https and email. Any suggestions? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -
2005 Mar 14
4
[SMB 3.0.10] File Locking Mechanism Windows <-> Unix
Hello, Iam facing a problem in locking of files across samba shares. We have samba 3.0.10 running on Solaris 9 with the smb.conf as follows. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = NMUINT netbios name = NMUINTFS interfaces = <IP> bind interfaces only = Yes security = DOMAIN password server = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX log level = 1 ldap
2011 Dec 06
3
[OT] posting bounties for rpms compatible with centos?
Is there an etiquitte to posting bounties to the centos community for OSS to be packaged in rpm form for centos? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555
2011 Feb 21
2
java-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64 keeps clobbering logging.properties
It appears that the rpm does not list the logging.properties as a config file, as such every time yum updates the file get overwritten. /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/logging.properties For now I have a cron job to replace it. Any suggestions? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -
2014 Jan 15
1
Mock and Mock again
Question: If I use mock to build package rpmA from tarballA but rpmA has a dependency that can only be satisfied by package rpmB which must also be built from tarballB then how does the rpmB built from the tarballB get pulled into mock when building rpmA? I am trying to build httpd-2.4.7 from Apache and that needs apr-devel and apr-util-devel > 1.4. I can build apr and apr-utils in mock but
2016 Apr 15
4
libdrm info wrong when build with mock - test solution??
Hello guys... I compiled inside of "mock" libdrm 2.67 mesa 11.2.1 ati 7.6.1 mockbuild says: libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK installed packaged: xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64 7.6.1-1.el7.centos @local-drivers OK libdrm.x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK
2010 Jul 24
1
Exchange UM Play on Phone
I haven't been successful in getting this to work. The issue looks to be that Asterisk is wanting peer authentication for the invite request as it sends back 401 Unauthorized. I am using FreePBX 2.7 and have tested both Asterisk 1.6.1.18 and 1.6.2.9. My trunk settings are type=peer transport=tcp qualify=yes insecure=port,invite host=10.10.1.31 context=from-internal Here is snippets of the