similar to: RHEL 6 potential release date???

Hi, Is there way to subscribe centos security alerts via email? like: http://lwn.net/Alerts/CentOS/ -- Eero

Hi gang, In 500 words or less (if possible), please explain what is a legal music-on-hold file? My boss hates the stuff provided with the distribution and I figure that I'm asking for trouble if I take my Les Mis tracks and run them through Audacity and SOX to make new files. Thanks in advance Danny Nicholas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

I have uploaded xend.log http://pastebin.com/XyQkEits and daemon.log http://pastebin.com/m0fpnzyR I was creating a DomU which had failed to boot via pygrub. It seems problem lies in Debian itself /var/run/xend/boot/ does not exist on the target system. Here is a snapshot http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4006/4626021351_d1a6f9c014_b.jpg Following was the error Traceback (most recent call last):

And if so where can I get information of what is being fixed/upgraded/added/deleted? Of course right now I only care about my bluetooth woes. ;)

I've been reading up on recommended partitioning scheme and looking at Centos 5 beta's default scheme, it struck me that with LVM, it doesn't matter any more as long as we leave aside enough room for /boot, does it? Or am I still missing something here? Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi: I have two time series y(t) and x(t). I want to regress Y on X. Because Y is a time series and may have autocorrelation such as AR(p), so it is not efficient to use OLS directly. The model I am trying to fit is like Y(t)=beta0+beta1*X(t)+rho*Y(t-1)+e(t) e(t) is iid normal random error. Anybody know whether there is a function in R can fit such models? The function can also let me specify

While building FSF gcc 5.1 against Apple's public Xcode 7 beta's new clang-based assembler, I ran into rejected assembly instructions during the -m32 multilb build of libjava. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509 With assembler errors of the form... natArray.s:1110:2: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix (could be 'filds', or 'fildl')

Hi! I just wanted to know if anyone can give a definitive answer if dovecot beta's memory requirements are much better than in the old pre-alpha "stable" series? I'm using a rather old stable.20050712 release on an also rather old Debian Sarge box to manage my personal mails. I'm pretty satisfied with this dovecot release but it's memory consumption when deleting

Hi there, Following situation: 3 nodes, Alpha (Home fileserver), Beta (regular PC), Gamma (Notebook). All three in a NATed LAN usually, though the notebook also gets carried around and connects from the outside from time to time. Tinc should help me keep my other 2 PCs reachable from Gamma, even when I'm not at home. Also I plan on maybe adding more nodes to that in the future. I have set

Hi, I have a dataset with the following properties: Y_i ~ N(mu_i, theta * (mu_i)^2) ln(mu_i) = B'Xi theta and beta's are the parameters here. I want to come up with a model to fit the data with the above property and test that model on the built in R dataset quine. Does nls() make sense in this case? Or is there any existing R package which can fit this model? -Shelly -- View

Good Evening (Dag and Karan), I have noticed the slight changes on the Download Page which is now linking to the RHEL Betas and want to take the discussion to the ML instead of the Wiki. I would personally prefer to link to the RHEL Betas from a (not yet created) Test-driving RHEL SIG page instead of the CentOS download page. This should be meant to promote project related downloads (resources

Dear R users, Does anyone know how to get standard errors of the parameter estimates in glmm.admb? Thanks, Istvan

Een ingesloten tekst met niet-gespecificeerde tekenset is van het bericht gescrubt ... Naam: niet beschikbaar Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20070813/fc375520/attachment.pl

Hi, In the package survival, using the function survreg for AFT model, I only see 4 distributions for the response y: weibull, gaussian, logistic, lognormal and log-logistic, which correspond to certain distributions for the error terms. I'm wondering if there is a package or how to obtain the parameter estimates (the beta's are of great interest) from the AFT model (maximizing

I have been using the mlogit package but can't seem to figure out how to make constraints on the beta coefficients. For example, I would like to force that two of my beta's are equal to each other. Thanks in advance. Jonah

I've been running into some problems with LVM thin provisioning in CentOS 6.3. Some of these I have reported to RH Bugzilla (e.g. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883629). The upshot seems to be that in RHEL 6.3 the features are "preview" but in 6.4 they are "full featured/robust" (hopefully) and many of the bugs are fixed. This raises the following

I thought I would give the new IMAP support a spin on my home server, but without much luck so far. Asterisk 1.4.0 Dovecot 0.99.14 Maildir format C-client 2006d The imap server is also the Asterisk server, so connections are on the localhost. The error posted to the logs is: IMAP Error: Can't open mailbox {127.0.0.1:143/imap/authuser=root//user=dan_austin}INBOX: invalid remote specification

Dear R community, I have data on beta&standard error (for the main effect of variable x), stratified by sex for my dataset. I wish to calculate the sex-interaction effect (as beta&se) from these two stratified datasets. Is there a package to do this? If not, any advice how to do it manually? Thank you very much and best regards, Georg. ************************ Georg Ehret, JHU,

Hi list, I have to connect two asterisk box, in this scenario: [asterisk1]----sip----[asterisk2]----PSTN I must use sip, cos we'll use cisco rtp header-compression to save bandwidth. Could you tell me the best way to send calls from asterisk1 to asterisk2, since I cannot use IAX trunking? Thanks in advance Eduardo

Christopher, I have a couple of other points. My recent email with the subject "nVIDIA on CentOS 3.3" was specifically in response to Kevin Wood's Fri, 17 Sep 2004 email with the subject "Does the nvidia graphic card problem still exist with CentOS-3.3?". The wording of my email came out wrong because I was responding to Kevin's email (which I copy below, along