Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Slow domain resolution problem"
2010 Aug 31
3
Automatically detecting LUNs without a reboot
Hi everybody.
I have an HP StorageWorks array connected to one of my servers,
connected via an LSI controller (lspci reports: SCSI storage controller:
LSI Logic / Symbios Logic SAS1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS (rev 08))
on an HP DL385 running CentOS 5.5 x86_64.
I have set up multipath and all is working but, when I create a snaphost
and export it as a new LUN from the HP web interface, it
2011 Aug 01
2
RedHat to CentOS packages
Dear all,
We're trying to use Nessus to monitor our system and we're having a hard
time mapping the package versions from RedHat to CentOS in order to be
able to report against CVE (vulnerability reports).
After some research, we think that the mapping is as follows (using
HTTPD as the example):
CentOS httd-2.2.3-43.el5.centos.3 is equivalent to RedHat
httpd-2.2.3-43.el5_5.3
So, it
2010 Sep 11
1
Network cards not recognised
Hi,
We have a HP DL385 G6 server that is having an issue. Two of the 4
network cards are not being recognised by Linux.
We have quite a few other servers with the same hardware and no issues
but, before I call HP, I would like to make sure that I am not doing
anything wrong :)
I have tried with the kernel that came with CentOS 5.5 and the updated
one kernel-2.6.18-194.11.3.
I do an lspci
2016 May 16
2
Función ARIMA
Buenas tardes a la comunidad R
Quiero hacer un consulta sobre una duda que tengo en R. Específicamente es
saber como puede en R eliminar de un modelo ARMA los coeficientes no
significativos, por ejemplo en eviews yo puedo especificar ar(1) ar(4)
ar(5) ar(8) los cuales para mi caso son los significativos. Sin embargo en
R debo especificar c( 8,0,0)
usando la función Arima del paquete forecast,
2009 Mar 30
3
[Bug 588] New: make ipv6 optional in iptables
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588
Summary: make ipv6 optional in iptables
Product: iptables
Version: CVS (please indicate timestamp)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: ip6tables
AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org
2020 Aug 12
7
Samba DNS fails when queried with nslookup commands
Hello,
???? Having issues with a DC not responding to DNS requests. OS is
Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS. Samba version 4.12.2 compiled from source. Checking
to see what is listening on port 53 reports;
@soldc4:~# netstat -tulpn | grep ":53"
tcp??????? 0????? 0 127.0.0.53:53 0.0.0.0:*?????????????? LISTEN?????
2935/systemd-resolv
tcp6?????? 0????? 0 :::53 :::*??????????????????? LISTEN?????
2020 Aug 13
3
Samba DNS fails when queried with nslookup commands
Hai James,
Thanks, thats exactly what we needed.
I'll comment below.
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: James Atwell [mailto:james.atwell365 at gmail.com]
> Verzonden: donderdag 13 augustus 2020 14:46
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> CC: L.P.H. van Belle
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba DNS fails when queried with
> nslookup commands
>
> Hi Louis and
2016 Aug 04
1
Samba 4.2.14 Group Policy (GPO) sync error
Just I missed the correct IPv6 PTR record from the DNS.
Ok and whats obligated for a correct working kerberos environment.
Ahh.. Yes... dns A and PTR records. ;-) so one thing fixed thats ok..
The PC, ( ipconfig /all ) looks good now.
Next.. your hosts files...
> my /etc/hosts:
>
> # IPv4 and IPv6 localhost aliases
>
2000 Sep 28
4
Name Resolution
Hello, samba
In my net (with samba installed) all works well, but I want windows users
to authenthicate in my samba server. And I have tried a lot of things,
without result.
If anybody using it could send me his (or her) smb.conf file, I would be
pleased.
Thanks
angel
2008 Jan 18
3
name resolution question
Can anyone explain the following behavior to me?
[jgreen at t-rex ~]$ nslookup proteome.hpcc.triad.local
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address: 127.0.0.1#53
Name: proteome.hpcc.triad.local
Address: 10.2.149.1
[jgreen at t-rex ~]$ nslookup proteome.vlan88.hpcc.triad.local
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address: 127.0.0.1#53
Name: proteome.vlan88.hpcc.triad.local
Address: 192.168.88.179
2023 Jan 05
1
Question about KDC Resolution with Samba
I'm running a debug script from this site (Dated 16 Aug 2019, created and maintained by Rowland Penny and Louis van Belle). The script obtains the Linux server DOMAIN by running "hostname -d" which returns "mycorp.com". Next the script runs
nslookup -type=SRV _kerberos._tcp.mycorp.com
which fails
** server can't find _kerberos._tcp.mycorp.com: NXDOMAIN
and the
2016 Jun 05
2
inconsistent DNS information, windows domain member issues..
I joined a Windows 10 Pro system to my (still experimental) domain. The
windows system actually hosts DC2 as a VM, and another Windows (Server 2008
R2) at another location hosts DC1 also as a VM. The two locations are
connected via a VPN, both systems run only when needed. The windows system
does not directly use DC2 for DNS but instead talks to a DNS resolver that
delegates the samba Domain to
2019 Aug 05
2
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
what is weird is that i have not changed it for about 2 years, only apt
update, upgrade. no other change, ipv4 and ipv6 address working correctly.
now there is this bug, that i have not changed anything and suddenly, DLZ
generates an unknown not connected , working, live ip4 and ip6.
and all because it tried an nslookup p3x-dc.patrikx3.com that was the
correct for over 2 years.
the only thing that
2018 Nov 27
10
Setup a Samba AD DC as an additional DC
Hai,
I had a quick look.
Barry, can you get this script and run it.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh
Then post the results to the list.
It collects all info i need to have a better look.
I have a few ideas, this might be a resolving order problem, i've based on the errors below.
Can you also post the output of bind from the point its
2016 Aug 04
2
Samba 4.2.14 Group Policy (GPO) sync error
Perhaps I am on the wrong track but I would like to share some
additional observations...
I quickly enabled DNS query logging:
# rndc querylog
Then run another gpupdate on the client.
During the Update I see lots of queries:
04-Aug-2016 14:46:58.414 queries: info: client 10.0.1.186#59270
(_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.ad.cyberdyne.local):
view internal: query:
2016 Aug 03
5
Samba 4.2.14 Group Policy (GPO) sync error
Can you run on a failing computer :
- netdom verify yourpcname
- nslookup yourpcname
All ok?
And is time in sync?
Did you install winbind after the update and also and did you change you server services line?
Like, i use bind9 dns
My smb.conf contains only this : server services = -dns
The full line is :
samba-tool testparm -vv | grep "server service"
2015 Mar 20
3
Fwd: Dynamic DNS Updates not working. samba_dnsupdate : (sambalist: message 3 of 20) RuntimeError: (sambalist: to exclusive) kinit for [DC@Realm] failed (Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm)
Thank you Louis for that answer! Actually I did get kinit and
samba_dnsupdate working, though I am unsure how. I tried some changes to
krb5.conf in the [realms] and [domain_realm] sections, als well as
setting dns_lookup_realm = false to true, but reverted it all back to the
initial file:
[libdefaults]
default_realm = INTRANET.MAYWEG.NET
dns_lookup_realm = false
dns_lookup_kdc = true
After a
2002 Nov 05
2
2.5.6 release
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 10 Oct 2002, "Green, Paul" <Paul.Green@stratus.com> wrote:
> > No new CVS messages have appeared on the rsync-cvs archives since August
> > 30th. This seems rather odd-- perhaps a daemon stopped working? If there
> > has truly been no activity since that date, I apologize for
> >
2009 Sep 18
0
rsync-3.0.6 on cygwin-1.7
A new 3.0.6 package is now available on cygwin-1.7; I don't plan to
upgrade Cygwin-1.5 packages anymore, so if you want newer releases on
rsync please upgrade to 1.7, with proper care:
http://cygwin.com/#beta-test
This release includes a small patch on rsync configure to detect IPv6
and xattr on Cygwin, please consider including them (or a modification
of them) upstream to help people have a
2014 Apr 21
2
Samba 4.1.6 and 4.1.7 Kerberos problem on Debian Linux
I am trying to setup an AD using a Linux server to get away from Windows Server 2008. So far I have tried the setup on both a Debian 7.4 64 bit machine, and a Raspberry Pi (Debian variant). I've tried both Samba stable versions 4.1.6 and 4.1.7, and they both give me the same results.
I followed the instructions to install the Samba 4 AD setup at