Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "fail2ban behavior"
2017 Mar 01
3
fail2ban Asterisk 13.13.1
Hello, fail2ban does not ban offending IP.
NOTICE[29784] chan_sip.c: Registration from
'"user3"<sip:1005 at asterisk-ip:5060>' failed for 'offending-IP:53417' - Wrong
password
NOTICE[29784] chan_sip.c: Registration from
'"user3"<sip:1005 at asterisk-ip:5060>' failed for ?offending-IP:53911' -
Wrong password
systemctl status
2017 Mar 02
3
fail2ban Asterisk 13.13.1
If this is a small site, I recommend you download the free version of SecAst
(www.telium.ca <http://www.telium.ca> ) and replace fail2ban. SecAst does
NOT use the log file, or regexes, to match etc.instead it talks to Asterisk
through the AMI to extract security information. Messing with regexes is a
losing battle, and the lag in reading logs can allow an attacker 100+
registration
2013 Oct 04
4
fail2ban
For dovecot 2.1
as per wiki2, is this still valid? noticed a problem before and saw
it does seem to be triggering, I use:
maxretry = 6
findtime = 600
bantime = 3600
and there was like, 2400 hits in 4 minutes, it is pointing to the
correct log file, but I am no expert with fail2ban, so not sure if the
log format of today is compatible with the wiki2 entry
filter.d/dovecot.conf
[Definition]
2017 Jul 27
1
under another kind of attack
> On 26 Jul 2017, at 7:57 pm, Olaf Hopp <Olaf.Hopp at kit.edu> wrote:
>
> Dear collegues,
>
> many thanks for your valuable input.
>
> Since we are an university GEO-IP blocking is not an option for us.
> Somestimes I think it should ;-)
>
> My "mistake" was that I had just *one* fail2ban filter for both cases:
> "wrong password" and
2020 Apr 09
2
fail2ban firewalld problems with current CentOS 7
Hi!
I have a server running CentOS 7.7 (1908) with all current patches installed.
I think this server should be a quite standard installation with no specialities
On this server I have fail2ban with an apache and openvpn configuration.
I'm using firewalld to manage the firewall rules.
Fail2an is configured to use firewalld:
[root at server ~]# ll /etc/fail2ban/jail.d/
insgesamt 12
2017 Dec 17
1
ot: fail2ban dovecot setup
On Mon, December 18, 2017 3:06 am, Alex JOST wrote:
> Did you enable the dovecot service in fail2ban? By default all jails are
> disabled.
>
> /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf:
> [dovecot]
> enabled = true
Alex, thanks
no, not in jail.conf, I've put it in the
(1)
/etc/fail2ban/jail.local
I've also added postfix, that seems to work:
I've made test failed dovecot and
2017 Jul 29
1
under another kind of attack
Hi to all,
@Olaf Hopp I've this filter enabled for fail2ban, my question is: could
my filters overlap or interfere with those suggested by you?
this is my filter:
Contents of /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf:
[postfix]
# Ban for 10 minutes if it fails 6 times within 10 minutes
enabled = true
port = smtp,ssmtp
filter = postfix
logpath = /var/log/mail.log
maxretry = 6
bantime = 600
2019 Apr 26
5
faI2ban detecting and banning but nothing happens
On Friday 19 April 2019 16:15:32 Kenneth Porter wrote:
> On 4/19/2019 5:30 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > I've followed one of the pages on line specifically for installing fail2ban on
> > Centos 7 and all looks fine.
>
> Which page? It would help to see what they advised.
> On Friday 19 April 2019 16:15:32 Kenneth Porter wrote:
> On 4/19/2019 5:30 AM, Gary Stainburn
2017 Dec 16
7
ot: fail2ban dovecot setup
I'm trying to setup and test fail2ban with dovecot
I've installed fail2ban, I've copied config from
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/Fail2Ban, and, trying to test it,
attempted multiple mail access with wrong password, but, get this:
# fail2ban-client status dovecot-pop3imap
Status for the jail: dovecot-pop3imap
|- Filter
| |- Currently failed: 0
| |- Total failed: 0
| `- File
2016 Mar 10
0
[ISC Crosspost] Novel method for slowing down Locky on Samba server using fail2ban
From: bounces at isc.sans.edu
To: sbradcpa at pacbell.net <sbradcpa at pacbell.net>
Novel method for slowing down Locky on Samba server using fail2ban
https://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?n&storyid=20805
http://www.heise.de/security/artikel/Erpressungs-Trojaner-wie-Locky-aussperren-3120956.html
Google Translate version of above:
If you teach the Samba server to monitor and write Rename
2019 Apr 29
2
faI2ban detecting and banning but nothing happens
On Monday 29 April 2019 02:21:05 Gordon Messmer wrote:
> That's one approach.? I believe that you could modify fewer files by
> setting "port = 0:65535" in your definition in "jail.local" and not
> install firewallcmd-ipset.local.
I have just tried this, and re-started fail2ban. It does not seem to have worked.
I have looked at /var/log/exim/main.log and found
2012 Apr 20
2
fail2ban attempt, anyone want to add anything?
Tonight I added fail2ban to one of my webservers to test it out.
Here is my step by step, as best as I could figure it
out...documentation a bit sketchy.
feel free to add anything to it or suggest changes.
I tried to set it up to deal with ssh, http authentication, dovecot,
ftp, and postfix
I could find no working example for centos 6 and there is no fail2ban
book available to peruse.
So,
2011 Mar 28
8
asterisk and fail2ban
Is anyone using asterisk with fail2ban? I have it working except it takes
way more break-in attempts than what is set in "maxretry" in jail.conf
For example, I get an email saying:
"The IP 199.204.45.19 has just been banned by Fail2Ban after 181 attempts
against ASTERISK."
when "maxretry = 5" in jail.conf
Perhaps someone else is experiencing this or has resolved it,
2016 Aug 20
4
What is broken with fail2ban
Hello List,
with CentOS 7.2 it is not longer possible to run fail2ban on a Server ?
I install a new CentOS 7.2 and the EPEL directory
yum install fail2ban
I don't change anything only I create a jail.local to enable the Filters
[sshd]
enabled = true
....
.....
When I start afterward fail2ban
systemctl status fail2ban is clean
But systemctl status firewalld is broken
? firewalld.service -
2012 May 28
1
anyone care to helop with a fail2ban problem on Centos 5.8?
I've got an up-to-date Centos 5.8 and can't seem to get fail2ban to
get rid of troublesome sshd login attempts. /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf
has these sections:
[ssh]
enabled = true
port = ssh
filter = sshd
logpath = /var/log/auth.log
maxretry = 6
# Generic filter for pam. Has to be used with action which bans all ports
# such as iptables-allports, shorewall
[pam-generic]
enabled =
2011 Aug 09
3
fail2ban help
Hello list.
I have a question for fail2ban for bad logins on sasl.
I use sasl, sendmail and cyrus-imapd.
In jail.conf I use the following syntax:
[sasl-iptables]
enabled = true
filter = sasl
backend = polling
action = iptables[name=sasl, port=smtp, protocol=tcp]
sendmail-whois[name=sasl, dest=my at email]
logpath = /var/log/maillog
maxretry = 6
and the following filter:
2015 Mar 10
2
Fail2Ban Centos 7 is there a trick to making it work?
On Mon, March 9, 2015 13:11, John Plemons wrote:
> Been working on fail2ban, and trying to make it work with plain Jane
> install of Centos 7
>
> Machine is a HP running 2 Quad core Xeons, 16 gig or ram and 1 plus TB
> of disk space. Very generic and vanilla.
>
> Current available epel repo version is fail2ban-0.9.1
>
> Looking at the log file, fail2ban starts and stops
2015 Mar 09
1
Fail2Ban Centos 7 is there a trick to making it work?
Been working on fail2ban, and trying to make it work with plain Jane
install of Centos 7
Machine is a HP running 2 Quad core Xeons, 16 gig or ram and 1 plus TB
of disk space. Very generic and vanilla.
Current available epel repo version is fail2ban-0.9.1
Looking at the log file, fail2ban starts and stops fine, there isn't
output though showing any login attempts being restricted.
2020 May 22
1
fail2ban setup centos 7 not picking auth fail?
I'm trying to set up fail2ban with dovecot, I have it working on 'old'
server Centos 6, but, not getting anywhere with 'new' server on Centos 7
using standard filters
I've copied same 'filter' to new server, still get nothing
any idea how to figure this out ?
on old server, it logs to syslog/messages
CentOS release 6.10 (Final) dovecot 2.3.10.1 (a3d0e1171)
old #
2017 Jul 25
10
under another kind of attack
Hi folks,
"somehow" similar to the thread "under some kind oof attack" started by "MJ":
I have dovecot shielded by fail2ban which works fine.
But since a few days I see many many IPs per day knocking on
my doors with wron password and/or users. But the rate at which they are knocking
is very very low. So fail2ban will never catch them.
For example one IP:
Jul 25