similar to: tricky perl question - ascending order

Hi, I am accessing records in Stores table as follows in @store object. ============================================= @store_pages, @stores = paginate :stores, :order_by => ''store_rating'', :per_page => 10 ============================================= Now I want that records returned by above objects should be in descending order. How to do this in above statement?

THX. You are right!! a[order(-1*a)] [1] 110 23 4 3 2 Eryk coling wrote: > Hi, > > I know very little of R, but one suggestion could be to multiply your list > by "-1", then order, then multiply by "-1" again. > > Not very nice I realize. But it's "better than a poke in the eye with a > sharp stick" as a wise man once

Can anyone point me to examples with R code where bwplot in lattice is used to order the boxes in ascending order? I have found the following discussion and it partly works. But, I have a conditioning variable, so my example is more like bwplot(var1 ~ var2|condition, dat) Th example in the discussion below works only when there is not a conditioning variable as far as I can tell. I can tweak the

Dear list, I have a data frame (238304 rows and 6 columns). I want the data frame sorted by two columns in ascending order. I am showing the first 5 rows of the data frame > clones.info[1:5,1:6] USER_CLONE_ID CHROMOSOME Expr1002 KB_POSITION Allele_A WELL_ID 1 SNP_A-1855402 17 41419603 41419603 C rs17572851 2 SNP_A-4249904 17 41420045 41420045 A rs17572893 3 SNP_A-2174835 18 41407760

dump-core: store .xen_p2m or .xen_pfn section in pfn ascending order. So far the order isn''t specified and may be random in theory. But sorted array is requested by crash utility for efficient looking up. Fortunately it is the case except ia64 full virtualized domain. Update document such that those array must be sorted and fix the ia64 full virtualized domain case. -- yamahata

I've got a matrix with 2 columns and n rows. I need to sort it first by the values in column 1 ascending. Then for values which are the same in column 1, sort by column 2 decending. For example: 2 .5 1 .3 1 .5 3 .2 Goes to: 1 .5 1 .3 2 .5 3 .2 This is easy to do in spreadsheet programs but I can't seem to work out how to do it in R and haven't been able to find a solution anywhere.

Hi all, I have started work on an ElasticSearch FTS plugin for Dovecot. It's available now on GitHub at: https://github.com/ascendantcom/fts-elasticsearch Please note that it is still in heavy development right now. It supports indexing, searching and expunging with some caveats (no multi-mailbox search or attachments). Pull requests, suggestions and bug reports very welcome! Cheers,

Hi all, A while ago there was a discussion on changing the current "set of trees" representation of TBAA metadata to be more expressive, prompted by the need to support C structs. Dan Gohman also talked about the issue here: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-11/Gohman-AliasAnalysis.pdf. It was suggested that the trees be replaced by a type DAG then. While working on this compiler

I have a TDM400P with some FXO ports, and I wanted to connect the two POTS lines from my Pipeline-75 ISDN router into the FXO interfaces on my Asterisk server. Hooked it up, seemed fine, called in and it answered. The problem is when the call is hung up on, the FXO port never drops. So of course then the P75 just holds the line off hook and you get a busy. So it's good for the first

Hello folks, I've been trying to get T.38 over SIP working with calls terminated by a MAX/Lucent/Ascent TNT. As far as I can tell, SIP and T.38 are actually working perfectly; however, I can't get the TNT to properly terminate a FAX call. Does anyone have a working configuration for SIP and T.38 for calls from a TNT or APX? Here's a brief description/diagram of my test setup: