similar to: Ruby-1.9.1+ rpm for CentOS-5

On Thu, June 16, 2016 13:53, Walter H. wrote: > On 15.06.2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote: >> but it also affects the other public CAs: you can???t get a >> publicly-trusted cert for a machine without a publicly-recognized >> and -visible domain name. For that, you still need to use >> self-signed certs or certs signed by a private CA. >> > A private CA is the

On Fri, June 17, 2016 11:06, Walter H. wrote: > On 17.06.2016 16:46, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Thu, June 16, 2016 13:53, Walter H. wrote: >>> On 15.06.2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote: >>>> but it also affects the other public CAs: you can???t get a >>>> publicly-trusted cert for a machine without a publicly-recognized >>>> and -visible

On 17/06/16 15:46, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Thu, June 16, 2016 13:53, Walter H. wrote: >> On 15.06.2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote: >>> but it also affects the other public CAs: you can???t get a >>> publicly-trusted cert for a machine without a publicly-recognized >>> and -visible domain name. For that, you still need to use >>> self-signed

On 6/24/20 12:27 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > ... You can look in the %{BUILDTIME} query tag for build order; use > the following command to get the order: > rpm -qa --queryformat "%{BUILDTIME} %{NAME} %{EPOCH} %{VERSION} > %{RELEASE}\n" | sort So, replying to my own post here, as build order is only part of the story.? Determining the contents of what was in the actual

Does anyone know of a repository that's *trustworthy* (gotta worry 'bout malware) with newer ruby rpm's than RHEL has? OT: the more I deal with ruby, the less I like it. Someone here was ready to move to a newer version, and from the ruby.org website, they're apparently actively hostile to all RH-related distros, even though we're the most common in North America. They've

On 20/06/20 3:50 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Your dates are significantly off > Wikipedia has a delay listed in a table: > > It is, for CentOS-7, For example: > > 7.0 27 > 7.1 26 > 7.2 25 > 7.3 39 > 7.4 43 > 7.5 31 > 7.6 34 > 7.7 42 > 7.8 28 > > > For 6 .. since 6.2, it has bee3n between 10 and 18 days. > > For 8: > > 8.0

On Tue, March 31, 2009 13:03, James B. Byrne wrote: > Found it. No etc/at.allow and no etc/at.deny means only root can > submit jobs. > Well, that was not it. I still get the same errors after adding my user id to /etc/at.allow. I tested whether job control was enabled by moving top into the background using ctrl-z and fg to return and that worked. Any suggestions as to what I am

Here is my class class puppetconf { file { "/etc/puppet/puppetd.conf": mode => 644, owner => root, group => root, source => "puppet://puppet/cci/etc/puppet/puppetd.conf", notify => exec[puppet_restart] } file { "/etc/init.d/puppet": mode => 755, owner => root, group => root,

Hey guys, I get a very strange behavior when I attempt to install the Rails gem on my server: [root@hotaces local]# gem install rails --remote Attempting remote installation of ''rails'' Successfully installed rails-1.0.0 Normally it asks if I want to include dependencies etc. etc. This appears to be instant but then when I try to use the rails command it is not there. I

The khwrngd thread is started when a hwrng device of sufficient quality is registered. The virtio-rng device is backed by the hypervisor, and we trust the hypervisor to provide real entropy. A malicious hypervisor is a scenario that's ruled out, so we are certain the quality of randomness we receive is perfectly trustworthy. Hence, we use 100% for the factor, indicating maximum confidence

The khwrngd thread is started when a hwrng device of sufficient quality is registered. The virtio-rng device is backed by the hypervisor, and we trust the hypervisor to provide real entropy. A malicious hypervisor is a scenario that's ruled out, so we are certain the quality of randomness we receive is perfectly trustworthy. Hence, we use 100% for the factor, indicating maximum confidence

> On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:36:48 +1300 > Jegadeesh Kumar wrote: > >> I setup the RPM build server and read some doc to write the spec >> files. but i did get it clearly. So can you guys please help me >> to write a new RPM spec. If you have set up an RPM build server then you should have installed the rpmbuild and rpmdevtools packages. If you have installed the latter

A short time ago a message on this list referred to an OSS project called ledgersmb. I am having a deal of difficulty getting this installed and as the web page at www.ledgersmb.org yields a "page not found" error and the ledger-smb-users mailing list seems very lightly used I wonder if someone here could help me out? I have ploughed through all of the perl dependencies for ledgersmb

On Tue, September 11, 2007 12:58, James B. Byrne wrote: > > Is my understanding of this correct or in what matter is it defective? > Evidently defective. I have found another reference that describes sub-packages. So the unqualified %files directive is for the base package and the qualified ones are for the sub-packages. Is this correct? Sincerely, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a

Hey guys, I often get this problem the first time I try to deploy a rails app on dreamhost and I''m not sure what the cause is. Basically, I have an app that''s running fine on my local machine. I''ve uploaded the app, configured and migrated to the latest version of the db, and set all of the necessary directories to 755. But when I run dispatch.rb in ssh or

On Aug 26, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Devang Patel wrote: >>> I do not understand how the "inlinehint" will help. How will it >>> influence the inliner ? >> >> The hint should make it more attractive to inline. I don't know >> the details >> yet and they will require some experimenting. >> > > In that case you want to add hint to A

CentOS-5.7 SQLite-3.6.6 Ruby on Rails 3.1 Ruby-1.8.7 I have a situation wherein the version of SQLite-3 on CentOS-5 is too 'old' for the Ruby language sqlite3 DBMS adapter to successfully build against. I managed to obtain an rpm for ruby-1.8.7 but I cannot find one for sqlite-3.6.16 or later. Does anyone here have a lead on where such a beast, including the sqlite development headers,

Hi, This is the first time I've come across this: pid 11415 (ipfw), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) The core dump landed in root's home directory in one of my jails. Has anyone seen this before? Should I be concerned? chkrootkit says nothing. (How trustworthy is its output? ;-) Thanks. Cheers. -- Ng Pheng Siong <ngps@netmemetic.com> http://firewall.rulemaker.net

CentOS-6.4_x86_64 I have a KVM virtual machine (several actually) which acts as a warm spare for another kvm instance running on a different physical host. Each hour it backs up the live system using rsync. This morning I discovered that the backup instance was running at 99% utilisation and that the process consuming the entire virtual cpu was this: sh -c rpm -q -a --queryformat

Does anyone know of a reputable repository where I can obtain a CentOS-6 version of Blink as an rpm/yum package? I have to support three platforms (OSX, MS-Win and CentOS-Linux) with SRTP capable soft-phones. interoperating with an Asterisk-11 PBX; and I would rather have only one client to deal with. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne