On Tue, September 11, 2007 12:58, James B. Byrne wrote:> > Is my understanding of this correct or in what matter is it defective? >Evidently defective. I have found another reference that describes sub-packages. So the unqualified %files directive is for the base package and the qualified ones are for the sub-packages. Is this correct? Sincerely, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3
I am now getting this:
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
+ --with-sitedir=/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby --with-default-kcode=none
--with-bundled-sha1 --with-bundled-md5 --with-bundled-rmd160
--enable-shared --enable-ipv6 --enable-pthread
--with-lookup-order-hack=INET --disable-rpath --with-ruby-prefix=/usr/lib
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49488: line 62: --with-sitedir=/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby:
No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49488 (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49488 (%build)
[byrnejb at xen01 SPECS]$ ll /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Sep 7 12:14 1.8
Since /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby evidently exists, why am I being told that
it does not?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3