similar to: glusterFS

Hi, I've created a 2 node glusterFS test (Gluster 3.8). Without enabling NFS-Ganesha, when I try to mount from a client using glusterfs option - everything works. However, after enabling NFS-Ganesha, when I try to mount from a client using the glusterfs option (fuse), it fails with the following output (when using the log-file option): [2017-12-28 08:15:30.109110] I [MSGID: 100030]

Dear GlusterFS Engineer, I have questions that my glusterfs server and fuse client perform properly on below specification. It can write only *65MB*/s through FUSE client to 1 glusterfs server (1 brick and no replica for 1 volume ) - NW bandwidth are enough for now. I've check it with iftop - However it can write *120MB*/s when I mount nfs on the same volume. Could anyone check if the

Do we have ACL support on nfs-ganesha? On Aug 30, 2017 3:08 PM, "Niels de Vos" <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:52:59PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > > What is Gluster/NFS and how can we use this. > > Gluster/NFS (or gNFS) is the NFS-server that comes with GlusterFS. It is > a NFSv3 server and can only be used to export Gluster

What is Gluster/NFS and how can we use this. On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:03:02PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > I have an query regarding the usage of ACL on gluster volume. I have > > noticed that when we use normal gluster volume (without ACL) CPU load is > >

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:52:59PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > What is Gluster/NFS and how can we use this. Gluster/NFS (or gNFS) is the NFS-server that comes with GlusterFS. It is a NFSv3 server and can only be used to export Gluster volumes. You can enable it: - install the glusterfs-gnfs RPM (glusterfs >= 3.11) - the glusterfs-server RPM might contain the NFS-server (glusterfs

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:03:02PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > Hi Team, > > I have an query regarding the usage of ACL on gluster volume. I have > noticed that when we use normal gluster volume (without ACL) CPU load is > low, but when we apply the ACL on gluster volume which internally uses Fuse > ACL, CPU load gets increase about 6x times. > > Could you please let

Gluster does the sync part better than corosync. It's not an active/passive failover system. It more all active. Gluster handles the recovery once all nodes are back online. That requires the client tool chain to understand that a write goes to all storage devices not just the active one. 3.10 is a long term support release. Upgrading to 3.12 or 4 is not a significant issue once a replacement

Hi all: I saw the thread "Netboot / PXE-Boot from glusterfs?" in the online list archives and decided to subscribe to the mailing-list and share some notes I have. Sorry for not being able to thread my reply in. Anyway, I have recently added experimental support for GlusterFS to Perceus, which is a provisioning system which supports stateful (with disk) and stateless (diskless)

We have seen at a number of deployments, users experiencing slowness of GlusterFS over a period of time (as the volume usage grows). Some times it happens once in a day. This is due to updatedb cron job script that wakes up once in a day to index all the files it can find. It is configured by default to ignore network file systems such as NFS and lustre. Please add fuse.glusterfs to the list.

On 02/19/2018 10:24 AM, TomK wrote: > On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: > + gluster users as well.? Just read another post on the mailing lists > about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. That's funny because I've answered questions like this several times. Gluster+Ganesha+Pacemaker-based HA is available up to GlusterFS 3.10.x. If you need HA,

On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: + gluster users as well. Just read another post on the mailing lists about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. Perhaps there's a way to get NFSv4 work with GlusterFS without NFS Ganesha then? Cheers, Tom > Hey All, > > I've setup GlusterFS on two virtuals and enabled NFS Ganesha on each > node.? ATM the

I have the following setup with GlusterFS. Server: 4 - CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz - RAM: 32G - HDD: 1T, 7200 RPM (x 10) - Network card: 1G x 4 (bonding) OS: Centos 6.4 - File system: XFS > Disk /dev/sda: 1997.1 GB, 1997149306880 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 242806 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes >

Hello If you use Gluster as FUSE mount it's always slower than you expect it to be. If you want to get better performance out of your oVirt/Gluster storage, try the following: - create a Linux VM in your oVirt environment, assign 4/8/12 virtual disks (Virtual disks are located on your Gluster storage volume). - Boot/configure the VM, then use LVM to create VG/LV with 4 stripes (lvcreate -i

On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote: > On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug > configuration' off google.? Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't > help alot: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ > >

I set up a 3.3 gluster volume for another sysadmin and he has added it to his cluster via automount. It seems to work initially but after some time (days) he is now regularly seeing this warning: "Too many levels of symbolic links" $ df: `/share/gl': Too many levels of symbolic links when he tries to traverse the mounted filesystems. I've been using gluster with static mounts

Hi Team, I have an query regarding the usage of ACL on gluster volume. I have noticed that when we use normal gluster volume (without ACL) CPU load is low, but when we apply the ACL on gluster volume which internally uses Fuse ACL, CPU load gets increase about 6x times. Could you please let me know is this expected or we can do some other configuration to reduce this type of overhead on gluster

I have posted this to the lists purely to help others - please do not consider any of the following suitable for a production environment and follow these rough instructions at your own risk. Feel free to add your own additions to this mail posting as this may or may not work for everybody! I will not be held responsible for data loss, excessive CPU or mem usage etc etc etc... INSTALL NEEDED

On 2/19/2018 10:55 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Yep, I noticed a couple of pages including this for 'storhaug configuration' off google. Adding 'mailing list' to the search didn't help alot: https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/mailman/message/35929089/ https://www.spinics.net/lists/gluster-users/msg33018.html Hence the ask here. storhaug feels like it's not moving

I would like to see the steps for reference, can you provide a link or just post them on mail list? On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:29 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > Hey Guy's, > > A success story instead of a question. > > With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and > keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used

Hey Guy's, A success story instead of a question. With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled ) If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM me for the written up post or I could just post here if the lists allow it.