similar to: multi-seated configuration

Greetings, I mailed the list regarding an intercom system some months ago and we came to the conclusion that I should purchase a Polycom 501 phone. I'm now considering the purchase for this year, and I'm now wondering between the Polycom 501 and the 320 for the intercom. I don't need the spare ethernet on the phone because I would like to have my voice network separate from my

On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Andy Graybeal wrote: >> The Polycom 321 has not been EOL'd and supports VLAN. It is, however, >> lacking a 2nd ethernet port if you were to go that route. >> >> -M >> > Thanks for the response Mark. I see the 331 has two ports and the same > features as the 321. > > I'm wondering what phone would be best being used as an

Greetings, I need a 2 way intercom for separate kitchens to communicate without having to walk back and forth. The speaker has to be loud but clear, not distorted. Sometimes the kitchens can be noisy. It needs to be easy to use. It needs to be easy to clean. It would be nice if it used POE. Eventually I would like the kitchens to be able to dial different parts of the restaurant when I

Hello I have been wanting to set up a multi-seat system built around my linux desktop. Several years ago I set up a multi-seat system using X11. It difficult to setup and cause many different system errors. My new desktop supports VT-d but the VGA passthru is still too experimental for me at this point. I have looked at the USB display link but sounds like there is a performance issue with

Sorry about the lengthy post - I'm putting as much in here as I can in hopes that someone can help me ferret out the problem. Basic problem is that domain users can't successfully log into the linux box. I'm trying to set this box up as an ltsp server authenticating against our existing AD (although this is actually in a test lab - I didn't really want to trash anything real

Hi, I've been using pxe-enabled nic's with an lzpxe-etherboot image generated by rom-o-matic.net to boot a ltsp.org kernel, with dhcp 3 to use if statements to determine which filename option he gives to the pxe/etherboot dhcp client.Explained at http://www.ltsp.org/documentation/pxe.howto.html This works perfectly, except for the fact that you can't use 1 etherboot pxe image for

Hi, ipconfig is used in ltsp (thin clients) initramfs. Some of the users have to have 2 dhcp servers in ltsp environments, so they hit on this problem: The first dhcp request is from the pxe rom boot code. This code ignores any dhcp offers that don't have a filename field. So they always get the correct address, from the ltsp server. The second dhcp request (in initramfs) is done by

Hello all, I have a customer that insists of using upstream vendor's diskless (system-config-netboot) rather than LTSP. The reason is that he wants to use a 100% packages from the vendor, not from LTSP or any other party. I try the vendor's diskless system, and although it's very simple to setup, it lacks the support and/or documentation whereas LTSP is very good in it. Another

Hi, I am thinking of settting up a thin client server setup. I would like to set it up to work with linux and windows. I was going to use Symbiont but it says it needs a different version of linux to install. Has anyone used it with Centos before? Would it be easier to just install LTSP and set it up. I would like to b have a small box that does the dhcp and then allows users to logon to

hi! ;;.)== i'm having a slight problem here: # uname -nrs FreeBSD aegis.terrabionic.lan 4.7-STABLE # wine setup.exe /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libntdll.dll.so" not found # locate libntdll.dll.so /usr/local/lib/wine/libntdll.dll.so # cat /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf /usr/lib /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib # pkg_version | grep wine wine-2003.05.08

Hi All Can't connect WinXP (Remark: Group=SEC WinXP=M40G Samba Server=server.ltsp ipchains stop) # mount -t smbfs //M40G/Shared /mnt/WinXP/ params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: 192.168.0.1 M40G params.c:Parameter() - Unexpected

Good morning everybody, I'm pretty new to syslinux & tftp-hpa, and so I'm not quite sure where my question belongs to, but I'll try it here first. I want to enhance the network services by offering a LTSP (just for the case the pc or laptop doesn't work for some reasons). And so, for testing, I added a second linux-based system (lets call it system-b). Currently the tftpd

We're looking for what, years ago, I'd describe a s a X terminal -- something small, simple (and ideally cheap) that a user could display X applications on. I guess they're now called thin clients, but they now seem geared as seats on the web, and for this application we would need to be able display the results of running a homebrewed X application from a CentOS system, either

Hello all, In the network there is already a W2K server serving as DHCP server for the network. Then we want to implement LTSP, so we need to setup another DHCP server, right? Due to unexpected reason (little by little migration of w98 clients to LTSP), we need to keep the W2K server running in that network. Can we then have 2 DHCP server in the same subnet, only serving pre-determine clients

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

i have a lot of questions, maybe you've got some answers. I've got the following setup : 1 central server ( linux ) , 17 servers ( LTSP ) on different locations, where each server has a number of thinclients connected to it ( max 6 ) The central server / 17 LTSP servers are on the internet and share 1 VPN ( freeswan ). It would be nice if the 17 LTSP servers could use asterix on one

Greetings all- I need to purchase a PCIe SATA or SAS controller(non-raid) for a Supermicro 2U system. It should be directly bootable. Any recommendations? The system will be running CentOS 5.4 as an LTSP system. Thanks! --Tim

Is there an Edubuntu equivalent for Centos?

Hi, I'm investigating using LTSP for thin clients at my place of work, and I've encountered a problem that I don't know how to approach. I don't know if the problem is with gPXE, PXELinux, or the LTSP kernel, but I think PXELinux is probably the right level to investigate it. My situation is as follows: I've installed the LTSP system from Ubuntu Gutsy. I've tested it

Trying to set up ltsp and their instructions are outdated for this setup. this is what I am referencing... http://ltsp.mirrors.tds.net/pub/ltsp/docs/ltsp-4.1-en.html#AEN984 Anyway, KDM is display manager and I am only getting grey screen with X # ps aux|grep kdm root 4275 0.0 0.0 3036 864 ? Ss Jul01 0:00 /usr/bin/kdm -nodaemon per the instructions... /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess