similar to: CentOS 5.3 host not seeing storage device

I wanted to post this in case there is a real bug here. The system this is on is running Debian Etch with the Xen packages from Debian Unstable (currently 3.0.2+hg9697-1). I am running all packaged software so this is probably slightly out of date. This is on an HP DL320 G4 with a Pentium D 930 processor. I tried unloading and reloading the qla2xxx module, but rmmod reported it in use, however

> I wanted to post this in case there is a real bug here. > > The system this is on is running Debian Etch with the Xen packages from > Debian Unstable (currently 3.0.2+hg9697-1). I am running all packaged > software so this is probably slightly out of date. It would be interesting to see if this can be repro''ed on a tree built from a recent xen-unstable.hg.

I''ve compiled the 3.0-devel version on SUSE Linux 9.3. The ony problem is the qla2300 driver, which will not start all correctly on boot. So i cannot see other partitions than sda. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QLogic Fibre Channel HBA Driver ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:04:02.0[A] -> GSI 24 (level, low) -> IRQ 185 qla2300

For quite some time I?ve been using FreeNAS to provide services as a NAS over ethernet and SAN over Fibre Channel to CentOS 7 servers each using their own export, not sharing the same one. It?s time for me to replace my hardware and I have a new R720XD that I?d like to use in the same capacity but configure CentOS 7 as a Fibre Channel target rather than use FreeNAS any further. I?m doing

What is the trick to get Postfix's local command to pipe mail through procmail? I have: -bash-4.1$ grep allow_mail_to_commands /etc/postfix/main.cf allow_mail_to_commands = alias, forward and -bash-4.1$ cat .forward |/usr/bin/procmail and a .procmailrc file: -bash-4.1$ cat .procmailrc PATH=/usr/bsd:/bin:/usr/bin:/exp/rcf/share/bin MAILDIR=/var/lib/amanda/Mail #you'd better

I am trying to dedicate a number of PCI ports to DomU and no success! The PCI devices I am trying to dedicate are QLogic 23xx cards! I am using SUSE 10.1 with latest xen-unstable! I have followed all the instructions given in latest xen 3.0 manual. Like building the backend support in Dom0 Building the frontend support in DomU Using the pciback.hide=(xx:xx.x) in Dom0 command

Any reason why portaudit and its associated infrastructure was not announced to this list or security-notifications? I recently discovered it, and discovered the feature was added to bsd.port.mk in the beginning of feburary. Seeing as the security officer apparently (without announcement) no longer issues security notices (SNs) for ports, I am assuming that portaudit has replaced SNs entirely,

In waiting, I tried CentOS 8 which was an even bigger bust. I wiped that clean and tried again with Fedora 31. Same darn error "Could not create Target in configFS". Anyone?? Thank you, Steffan Cline steffan at hldns.com 602-793-0014 ?On 1/2/20, 2:00 AM, "CentOS on behalf of Steffan Cline via CentOS" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of centos at centos.org>

On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 09:00 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c > index 025dc2d3f3de..cdf671c2af61 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c > @@ -3719,7 +3719,8 @@ void qlt_free_cmd(struct qla_tgt_cmd *cmd) > return; > } >

On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 09:00 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c > index 025dc2d3f3de..cdf671c2af61 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c > @@ -3719,7 +3719,8 @@ void qlt_free_cmd(struct qla_tgt_cmd *cmd) > return; > } >

On 12/07/16 21:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:21:47AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> Additionally, there are notable exceptions to the rule that most drivers >> are endian-clean, e.g. drivers/scsi/qla2xxx. I would appreciate it if it >> would remain possible to check such drivers with sparse without enabling >> endianness checks. Have you

On 12/07/16 21:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:21:47AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> Additionally, there are notable exceptions to the rule that most drivers >> are endian-clean, e.g. drivers/scsi/qla2xxx. I would appreciate it if it >> would remain possible to check such drivers with sparse without enabling >> endianness checks. Have you

Hi In our office environment few servers mostly database servers and yesterday it happened for one application server(first time) the partion is getting "read only". I was checking the archives, found may be similar kind of issues in the 2007-July archives. But how it has been solved if someone describes me that will be really helpful. In our case, just at the problem started found

Hi, I setup two nodes, 192.168.20.20, and 192.168.20.21, The os is Ubuntu1204 with Kernel version 3.0: root at Server21:~# uname -a Linux Server21 3.2.0-23-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 10 20:39:51 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Server20 reboot for the disconnection with iSCSI SAN, so Server20 recovery resource locks for Server21. Server20: Feb 27 09:29:31 Server20 kernel:

Hi, I setup two nodes, 192.168.20.20, and 192.168.20.21, The os is Ubuntu1204 with Kernel version 3.0: root at Server21:~# uname -a Linux Server21 3.2.0-23-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 10 20:39:51 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Server20 reboot for the disconnection with iSCSI SAN, so Server20 recovery resource locks for Server21. Server20: Feb 27 09:29:31 Server20 kernel:

I''m wondering if anyone might have any suggestions... We''ve installed CentOS5.2 on 3 servers and have an FC switch, dual-port cards, and FC RAID device. We configured the RAID as two separate logical RAIDs. One is RAID-10 for speed and it hosts Xen VM images as LVs. The rest of the drive is RAID-5 to maximize space and houses a lot of lighter access data on a GFS2 filesystem.

hi All, thanks for the responses. After being dropped into the # Filesystem repair prompt, ( on account of "inode 27344909 has illegal blocks" ) following warm reboot (via "reboot") after finding (SAN ) filesystem in read-only mode yesterday morning (possibly because of HBA fault on SAN) , I ran fsck -r /data (Linux version 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 , Red Hat 4.1.2-42 , ext3

Hi fellows, I''m starting a small company developing a SNS website and we are using RoR. The concern we have right now is that we don''t want each of our developers get the entire Rails code base of our project. To my knowledge, there might be three pieces of ideas of potential technical solutions for us. But since I don''t really have any so called industrial experience

On 12/07/16 18:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > By now, linux is mostly endian-clean. Enabling endian-ness > checks for everyone produces about 200 new sparse warnings for me - > less than 10% over the 2000 sparse warnings already there. > > Not a big deal, OTOH enabling this helps people notice > they are introducing new bugs. > > So let's just drop __CHECK_ENDIAN__.

hi All, Re below - thanks for the replies to the fsck question. I have run fsck -r /data and this eventually completed with several changes made. Now I am getting the following error from the qla2xxx driver on boot . . . qla2xxx 0000:05:0d.0: Mailbox command timeout occured. Scheduling ISP abort. qla2xxx 0000:05:0d.0: Mailbox command timeout occured. Scheduling ISP abort. . etc . It looks