similar to: Setup multiple bridges for use with KVM

Here is the proposed revision to the bridge utilities interface to the kernel. The driving force is that the existing interface can't easily be converted to 32/64 bit compat. Right now, the bridge-utils (brctl) tries to handle 32bit command on 64 bit kernel, but the code is limited to sparc and wrong. Here is what I am thinking. get version - not needed? get bridges -

Hi all, I have one bridge system (used for controlling bandwidth) connected to three different DSL ISP provider. I have the following setup below: - +-------------+ | br0 | | -> eth1 | -> DSL_1 | -> eth2 | +-------------+ | br1 | | -> eth3 | -> DSL_2 | -> eth4 | +-------------+ | br2 | | -> eth5

The setup is 4 1TB drives running RAID10. I was using the Gnome Disk Utility to verify the integrity of the array (which is a 500MB mirrored md0 and the rest a R10 md1). I believe one of the drives is bad but prior to the system going offline it showed that 2 drives were detached from the array but healthy. A reboot results in a panic complaining that not enough mirrors are available. Is there a

Hello everybody! Spse I have the following X <- seq(1:100) #(a dim(100) sequence of integers 1:100 representing the possible actions of player 1 and player2 in a game) BR2X<- br2(X) #(a dim(100) sequence of points on range (1,100) representing the best response function of player 2 to player 1:s actions) BR1X<- br1(X) #(a dim(100) sequence of points on range (1,100)

I have a new Polycom Spectralink 8002 and am having trouble with the configuration or the unit but I can't see what's wrong. The unit does not seem to even attempt to register with the Asterisk proxy but I can make calls to it. I have viewed the syslog from the device which it will actually write to the asterisk server so I know it can be reached. I have also run a sip debug and

--On Monday, March 21, 2016 08:57:59 AM -0700 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/20/2016 08:51 PM, Devin Reade wrote: >> In a CentOS 7 test HA cluster I'm building I want both traditional >> services running on the cluster and VMs running on both nodes > > On a purely subjective note: I think that's a bad design. One of the >

I'm looking for some information regarding the interaction of KVM, VLANs, firewalld, and the kernel's forwarding configuration. I would appreciate input especially from anyone already running a similar configuration in production. In short, I'm trying to figure out if a current configuration is inadvertently opening up traffic across network segments. On earlier versions of CentOS

I have just noticed this message in my kernel logs, reporting the possibility of an error with my memory. This would go a long way towards explaining the problems i''ve been having. This particular error is occuring when i''m not running xen so is obviously not something brought on by xen itself. The strange thing is that the NMI error is always followed by the TLAN: eth0: Adaptor

A CentOS 6.3 box ("host") runs several KVM virtual machines, each of which has two interfaces attached to the two bridges br1 and br2 (and each thus has two IP's; one on 192.168.0.0/22 and one on 192.168.4.0/22); net.ipv4.ip_forward on the host is 1. Simplified diagram: host +---------------+ |

I had a major HD failure and need to rebuild my host server and the virtual servers that resided on it. I am moving from CentOS 5.6 to CentOS 6.3. I am using the same configuration, as best as I can tell, that was working only hours ago on 5.6 but does not work on 6.3. My guest server can see network traffic on the bridged network device but I cannot seem to interact with it. Iptables turned

hi- i''ve been trying to setup an outgoing queue that prioritizes traffic depending on whether it recognizes the MAC address the packet is destined to -- and i''ve not been having any luck. i think my ebtables rule is correct as the packet count when i do an --Lc is increasing in an expected way, but when i look at the tc statistics, i don''t think the packets are

Hi I''m testing around with xen 3.0 snapshot from last week. And i''m now having a problem with a xenbr which is based on a vlan if (dot1q). this is all in dom0 os: debian testing network: tg3 I can start the bridge based on my normal physical eth0 which is working without any problems. My clan without bridge is also working. I can start the bridge based on a vlan if with help

Dear list, Being a libvirt noob, I have some trouble understanding. It is about getting two different guest in the same network. *********** I've defined a network with libvirt. This is the source xml: <network> <name>private2</name> <uuid>9684f2c6-6fd0-491b-9cb5-80ee268b01ce</uuid> <bridge name='br2' stp='on' delay='0'/>

On 10/03/2016 07:00 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 > GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 ... > /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-lo > GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 Don't specify GATEWAY in interface files where it isn't used. This should be set on eth0 only. > # brctl show > > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces OK, so you don't have a bridge interface. If you want to

Greetings, I'm attempting to get several virtual machines setup on a Fedora19 host system, with the traditional bridge network devices (br0, br1, etc). I've done this many times before with older versions of Fedora (16, 14, etc), and it just works. However, for reasons that I cannot figure out, the bridge doesn't seem to be working in Fedora19. While I can successfully connect to

Hi, this is my Linux Box ---------------------------- LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | | \ | | eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link | / | LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 | ---------------------------- I have to bridge the 2 lans

I have an odd problem. I am running an ubuntu 10.04 domu that I got from stacklet on my centos 5.5/xen4.0.1 dom0. The problem is that even sitting idle the domu has a 1.05 load with init taking up 99% of that. I have searched around but have not found what is causing the issue. I thought I remembered this being mentioned on the list before but could not find it either. My domu.cfg is as

Hi, i am testing two bridges by sending to it random packets using hping2. First i create a random-length file, then i send it a lot of time on the wire using this command: for ($i=0; $i<50000; $i++) { hping2 -q -c 1 -d $data_len -E random.file 10.0.0.10 } My problem is that some packets are lost. Here is my setup: PC1 (10.0.0.1) ===== BR1 --------- BR2 ===== PC2 (10.0.0.10)

Hi all, I'm a little bit confused about networking in Centos 7: I've copied my bridge setup from a Centos 6 for KVM networking to Centos 7. I changed the interface name to the new schema and I had expect that it would work. But: The Bridges didn't came up with the following log message: "Error: Device 'br61' is waiting for slaves before proceeding with activation"

Hello. I desire to get bridge network working using virt-manager. Centos 7 and centos 7 guest. >From researching I think I need to have a ifcfg-br0 file like this ? cat ifcfg-br0 DEVICE=nm-bridge0 STP=no TYPE=Bridge BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.1.8 PREFIX=32 GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 IPV6INIT=no NAME=br0 ONBOOT=yes DELAY=0 Is that for sure needed ? The use that nm-bridge0 as the network name? I