similar to: Encrypted File Storage

Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> writes: > Could you try what happens, if you create the hardlink manually as the > vmail user _two_ times, if the first link() succeeds. Maybe: > > 1) hard links won't work on your encfs, > 2) link() fails with "Operation not permitted" instead of "File exists" in > your case, if the target file

Hi! Apologies if this has come up before, or if this is a duplicate posting (I tried posting before but I think it got lost). Anyways, I'm trying to set up an IMAP server with dovecot, and everything seems to be more or less working except that I periodically see error messages like this in my logs: Feb 18 01:01:15 stark dovecot: lmtp(31956, root at aleme.nu): Error:

A customer asked me if someone would be able to sniff (wireshark or something like that) a password if plugging into the same switch as their samba server. They use a desktop icon pointing at a plain old bat-file containing a "net use" command with the password right in there. I *assume* that the "net use" authenticates via encrypted communication? could someone confirm

What are the ramifications to a large key length when using pub/priv keys for ssh authentication. I have some remote admin and file transfers to manage and only have ssh access w/o vpn to use for it. Thanks, jlc

What is the ramifications to simply placing scripts in the /etc/cron.hourly directory as opposed to actually adding jobs via the crontab -e method? Is there any significance to using one method versus the other? Thanks! jlc

Hi, I have a small server at home. I like to put it 'online' and secure it as good as possible. The counterside of putting your personal backups on a server is that it might get hacked... and you don't want have to have your personal docs online... Do you think encryption is needed? How to use encryption with rsync? Thanks in advance, ~D

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Xen <list at xenhideout.nl> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I was wondering if I could ask this question here. > > Initially when I was thinking up how to do this I was expecting block > encryption to stay consistent from one 'encryption run' to the next, but I > found out later that most schemes randomize the result by injecting a >

useRs- I'm attempting to scan a more than 1Gb text file and read and store the values that follow a specific key-phrase that is repeated multiple time throughout the file. A snippet of the text file I'm trying to read is attached. The text file is a dumping ground for various aspects of the performance of the model that generates it. Thus, the location of information I'm wanting

I have postfix configured to deliver mail to dovecot over lmtp into a mailbox that then is accessed over imap. The imap server is running as the user "mail". Whenever I run "postfix flush" I get in mail.log: > Jun 12 05:37:45 li212-205 dovecot: lmtp(21288): Connect from local > Jun 12 05:37:45 li212-205 spamd[18173]: prefork: child states: II > Jun 12 05:37:45

Hi Chris, thanks for your answer. It is the first time I decided to encrypt my lvm. I choosed to encrypt the volume group, not every logical volume itself, because in case of doing lvm snapshots in that group they will be encrypted too? And how do I create a new encrypted volume group? Regards Tim Am 6. M?rz 2015 01:58:23 MEZ, schrieb Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com>: >On

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3752 Summary: rsync unusable with EncFS filesystem Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: micheala@jacey.org

Hi, I wonder if there is interest/intention to allow for encrypted .RData files? One can certainly do that outside R manually but that will leave a decrypted RData file somewhere which one has to remember to delete. Cheers, Michael

Hi, Is it possible to configure Dovecot to reject mail that is not encrypted. In other words: 1. If the user tries to send an unencrypted message from their MUA, the server rejects it. 2. If a third-party tries to send an unencrypted message to the user, the server rejects it. The end result would be that no mail stored on the server can be decrypted by the administrator. I am aware that: *

Hello. I want to make ESXi on LUKS encrypted partition. ESXi uses Mboot.c32. Can the Mboot.c32 work with luks-encrypted? If it is possible, where i can see an example? Thank you!

> On 11 April 2019 00:49 David Salisbury via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > >>> > >> Yes. I gave it a try here, and it seems to work. Does it give any extra > >> information if you include -i flag? > >> > >> Aki > >> > > > > Yes, I had tried that, and it doesn't give much extra information, at

Mike - st257 wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 5:50 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >> Mike - st257 wrote: <snip> >> > My servers have BMC with Serial over LAN support. In C5 and C6, I >> determined how to have BIOS/POST, kernel, and serial console access. I'm >> reading up on the method to accomplish the pieces with C7. >> > >> >

Hi, dom0: Debian Lenny 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64, domU: same. Xen 3.2-1 After resizing a LV on dom0, Xen is not reporting the new extended size to the PV domU even though dom0 is well aware of the new size. I''ve rebooted domU (not dom0 yet as that''s running a lot of other domU''s). The LV I tried to resize is encrypted. Resizing unencrypted volumes works as expected. dom0:~#

Hi. While debugging some encfs errors in the logs, I realized they are being generated because rsync (chrooted inside a encfs file system, --reverse) is trying to access files like: /root/.popt, /etc/localtime etc. This doesn't seem to be related to ID-name mapping as I already have numeric ids enabled in config. Here is the relevant strace output: [pid 25549] chroot("/chroot")

Hi everyone, I added a page under the HowTos for Encryption, and then added a guide for encrypting /tmp /swap and /home using cryptsetup and LUKS keys on LVM, when you already have partitions setup. http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/EncryptTmpSwapHome Regards, Max

On 4/10/2019 1:32 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 9.4.2019 18.15, Dave wrote: >>>> I've tried specifying an output file as well, per the script's >> command line options, >>>> but the output file is 0 bytes.? Does anyone have any suggestions? >> I *think* I'm >>>> using it the way it's intended to be used, but maybe I'm not?!