similar to: Secure mail login problem

Okay, Yahoo is bumming me. Only system my mail is having an issue with. All mail is accepted, but junked. I can only think it is the DKIM/Domain keys. It is apparent that the dkim-milter is not part of the centos 5.x distro nor is it part of the mirrors, as far as I can tell. So...have any of you done it with your servers for sendmail? There are some sites that claim to have rpms and I have

So, at wits end. Have gone back to plain text for pop3. I set up the ssl as per instructions but I always get a 'chain' error first time trying to receive mail with my mail client. Comes down I believe to the need to get a CA for dovecot's pem files or I will always get an error. Now I am thinking since I am self signing my own mail I should be able to make that intermediate crt

I''m looking for some evidence, backup up with dates and references, that shows that the Linux community responds to security problems more quickly than other OS vendors, and thus might be considered "more secure". A number of fairly high profile corporations are starting to look for such information as they consider Linux as an alternative solution to other UNIXes. Something

I have had the same email address since 1997 (when microsoft stole bob.com from me thanks to network solutions...) In the early days I of course was free with my email and used it everwhere. Fast forward to 2012, some 15 years later. woof..the amount of spam sent to me has always just kept getting worse and worse. On my centos 5 server I just used sendmail with spamassassin and it killed a

Hello, I have read and seen many options for additions to Iptables as a firewall and security system. All seem to react to logs and not to incoming packets (as far as I have seen) I am interested in doing a number of security ideas to the firewall, iptables, on my webserver. If you have a program you would suggest or believe iptables is the proper solution, please feel free to post that. Here

abaena@uol.com.br needs to fix their spam filter. Please stop using it or learn to configure it. + 1 Sep 22 AntiSpam UOL (6828) RE:Re: [Asterisk-Users] MS Outlook Thanks, Brian

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= CERT(sm) Advisory CA-96.20 Original issue date: September 18, 1996 Last revised: -- Topic: Sendmail Vulnerabilities - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** This advisory supersedes CA-95:05 *** The CERT Coordination Center

Hi all, Hope someone out there has experience with this. I can send, receive, and smtp my mail with my centos server fine and dandy. All the virtual domains headers for from and reply to and such are good. However, there is one field that I cannot change. (centos 5.2, dns, sendmail, virtualhosts all on same server) The ip and hostname of the server is coming up when the ehlo is called from the

Hm, look what I got hold of today.. Works if sendmail is mode 4111 or similar: #! /bin/sh # # # Hi ! # This is exploit for sendmail smtpd bug # (ver. 8.7-8.8.2 for FreeBSD, Linux and may be other platforms). # This shell script does a root shell in /tmp directory. # If you have any problems with it, drop me a letter. #

Perhaps I am trying to do the impossible. centos6, spamassassin, procmail, dovecot, postfix. Postfix, by default, accepts all incoming mail to any user listed in the shadow/passwd and alias files. I cannot find a way to stop that without manually blocking each non wanted user (like nobody, apache) without killing local delivery. For most of the users listed in those files, who cares. However

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-06:13.sendmail Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Race condition in sendmail Category: contrib Module: contrib_sendmail Announced:

Hello anyone used OpenSSL before? Why do we need to pay for expensive SSL certs when there is OpenSSL which is provided free? Is there a difference? I''ve got an ecommerce website, and wondering if OpenSSL is enough? Your thoughts will be appreciated -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this

What I''m doing: I have Shorewall on a SuSE 9.0 machine, which is the firewall/router on the network. External interface is eth0 172.16.1.1, internal interface is eth1 10.40.1.1. (I used the Two-interface Linux System Quickstart Guide). All works well with that configuration. I also use PPPD for dial-in clients, and have two modems for incoming calls. Recently I added VPN interface

Hi, I'm looking for a solution to access pop mails (sendmail in linux) securely. Most of the access would be from window clients (outlook express etc). Is there a way to encrypt the password (like ssh2) when authenticating with sendmail? Any info is greatly appereceiated. Thx. Regards, Wong.

I noticed a behaviour which is kind of confusing. I have the puppetmasterd running. Now I want a new client to connect. I edit the site.pp and add the client. When the client is started I can see it with puppetca --list. So I sign the client. When it next tries to connect it shows: notice: Allowing ::ffff:192.168.x.y(::ffff:192.168.x.y) untrusted access to CA methods notice: Host

Hi, I'm trying to get apache, sendmail , and dovecot to use SSL certs signed by my own CA. I've got the apache certs working fine. However, dovecot ( I haven't even tried sendmail yet) doesn't seem to accept any of the certificates that I create for it. There is a script that comes with dovecot that creates self-signed certificates for you but, I need certificates signed by my own

Hello, We have one user who is complaining that he has lost mails from 3 imap folders, administered through squirrelmail. The folders suddenly appeared unregistered, and once manually registered they were empty. Has anyone observed something like this? We are running two servers (as VMs) with Dovecot v2.2.18, synced (two-way) using dsync. The configurations follow. Can you please help me

Hi; I continue to be plagued with this error: Oct 25 10:49:18 myserver postfix/pipe[3712]: 0423257901AB: to=<foo at bar.com>, relay=dovecot, delay=109318, delays=109318/0.14/0/0.1, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure It's been a week that I've been working day and night to get this fixed. I forgot to add this information: [root]# doveconf -n auth_mechanisms = plain

Hello Aki and all, The below lines are in the dovecot config file. This seems to be the same as Aki's suggestion. correct? I have also double checked file perms, tried with several new key gens, several versions of thunderbird and created completely new thunderbird profiles. Thank you, ssl_cert = </etc/letsencrypt/live/...../fullchain.pem ssl_key =

>From the config : auth_ssl_require_client_cert = no GMail empty vcard ... I have no ideas . so sorry. Coding snippets. What can I provide for you that will help? NOTE: it is pretty much the default config from Debian. Thank you, On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 9:29 PM Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > > On 2020-05-25 02:54, hanasaki at gmail.com wrote: > > Config has >