similar to: Error messages? or what

I've been getting LOTS of messages like the below in the daily log, and from all indications, it appears to all be related to the cpu; the machine is just over a year old, and was the old vortex.wa4phy;net server from the downtown co-lo site. Aside from huge log files, and lots of other fluff, numerous problems of other nature have started cropping up. Anyone have any suggestions as to

Hi! Before anything, here is my hardware/software informations : Hardware : -IBM x345, 1 CPU, 1G RAM, IBM ServeRAID controlle -6 HD used with LVM, 2 volume group, 12 logical volumes all running ext3 Software : -RedHat Linux Enterprise AS (Academic) 3.0 update 1 -Kernel 2.4.21-4.0.2.EL -samba-3.0.2-6.3E -Running an apache 2 web server -On normal use, there is only 10-15 computers

At the current time I am not subscribed to the mailing list. I have a blacklist that I got from www.peerguardian.net that is rather large ( 81 kb). When shorewall start command is issued it takes about 20 mins for it to load. Is this normal or should I do this another way? Also I noticed something very strange with shorewall .. I have cron do a shorewall restart command every 24 hours and

Hi all, I''m tring to isolate P2P traffic, specifically BitTorrent, for my QoS scripts. I can''t seem to completely isolate ALL BitTorrent traffic. I identify & mark packets and then use tc filters to put them into appropriate classes. My firewall rules (below) do the markings. My VoIP boxes'' and ICMP traffic get highest priority (mark 1). Then comes DNS, SSH,

Rowland, Thank you for all your help, I agree that this is not a Samba issue. Given rhat it works without the firewall. It' either a ufw or Windows 8.1 issue. Louis, Applied the rules you suggested to ufw exactly as written. No change. Still cannot connect with firewall enabled. Same error mesage as before "Cannot mount location ...". ufw log set to medium and copied below.

On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:53:29 +0100 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, >   > Just a questions, this might be a bug, might not, but for this one i > need some help. > Setup, debian 9. >   > Member server samba 4.9.3 > AD DC servers samba 4.8.7 >   > Im setting up the member with a very tight firewall, so nothing

Here is the ufw.log after enabling logging medium and trying to connect to the windows net. Unfortunately the web Microsoft page is in German. I think it says window uses smb1 syntax. Jan 27 15:11:09 martin-RB042AV-ABA-a1410y kernel: [ 887.241685] [UFW BLOCK] IN=enp2s5 OUT= MAC=00:19:21:a2:11:5e:74:27:ea:ab:1e:e0:08:00 SRC=192.168.254.15 DST=192.168.254.39 LEN=90 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128

Hai,   Just a questions, this might be a bug, might not, but for this one i need some help.   Setup, debian 9.   Member server samba 4.9.3 AD DC servers samba 4.8.7   Im setting up the member with a very tight firewall, so nothing in/our/routed unless its defined. Im using UFW firewall for it.   I notice the following in my member its firewall logs, and this only happend when i run : id or

My dcgui-qt (chat/file-sharing program) doesn''t work and I''m pretty sure it''s my firewall settings. dcgui-qt is a direct connect (file sharing & chat) client. According to the FAQ here (http://dcplusplus.sourceforge.net/faq/faq.php) all I should need to do is: ------- #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE ORIGINAL #

Here's the output: Feb 9 15:51:26 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:0f:ea:73:88:12:00:40:2b:67:5b:a7:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.54 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=51248 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1964 DPT=139 WINDOW=65535 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT (020405B401010402) Feb 9 15:51:28 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT=

I have a gentoo 2.6.14 box with 4 nics, LAN/DMZ/PUB1/PUB2 LAN and DMZ have a 1918 /22 each, PUB1 and PUB2 have a /29 each of which 5 ips are assigned. Using the mangle table, I give all packets a mark (according to local policies) in the range 1-10. Using ip rule, i pass marks 1-5 through the pub1 route table, and marks 6-10 through the pub2 routing table. Using the nat table, I SNAT to one

(anonymous post) I have a simple 2 interface firewall setup and all is good, almost. I am hosting virtual websites and DNS behind shorewall no problem. However I am trying to use SFTP via a different port number and have no luck even though Putty works well. Is there anything weird to sftp and shorewall? My lab uses a different firewall (firestarter) and it works OK. I am using; DNAT net

Hi, I'm experiencing the most perplexing problem with iptables on CentOS 5.2. I'm hoping someone can point out what I must be missing here. I have memcached set up on several nodes on an internal network. I have the following rules set up to allow traffic between memcached nodes: IPTABLES -A INPUT -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -j ACCEPT

I must have something configured wrong somewhere. I''ve enabled proxy-arp on my shorewall 2.0.7 firewall. Works fine for what its supposed to do, I can see all the machines through it great. However, whenever its enabled, the network on the DMZ goes screwy. I''ve narrowed it down to this: when proxy arp is enabled for that interface, like such: echo 1 >

Anyone, willing to take a lead on this one, since Tom is taking a rest: " I am hosting all servers by myself. I have five static IP addreses with a DSL line. My DSL router from the ISP provider is configured as bridge, so no traffic is filtered. I checked the logs and getting: Jan 5 23:05:12 gw1 kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=66.58.99.86 DST=216.35.73.164 LEN=68

Hi Tom Here is the output of shorewall status Thanks Lars [H[2JShorewall-2.0.13 Status at - Thu Dec 30 21:43:44 CET 2004 Counters reset Thu Dec 30 15:38:17 CET 2004 Chain INPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 38383 11M ACCEPT all -- lo * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 0 0 DROP !icmp --

Hi! I have many problems getting this thing to work. There''s a host with two network interfaces, where there are two routers to Internet in two separated networks. The host uses multihop routing for deciding to which router send the packets... but the routing decision is wrong made. Some packets with source address of one NIC, go to other network. I have a host with three NICs in it:

Last week, I started seeing very strange behavior in one of the networks that I manage. The office LAN uses a Linux firewall which masquerades their workstations over their DSL connection. There are probably ~75 workstations in the office LAN. Their mail server is in a collocated facility nearby. That server has an RFC1918 address; its router does SNAT to forward packets to the system. Both

I can see, that theres a program that keeps sending packets on port 25: Dec 27 14:11:46 a kernel: [ 6336.992320] O_D_LOG: IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=61533 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=37263 DPT=25 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Dec 27 14:12:01 a kernel: [ 6352.635704] O_D_LOG: IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=55853

Hello everybody, I have an odd problem with iptables using a Xen bridge setup. I don''t know if it would be better to post to netfilter Mailing-List. But I hope someone here know how to solve it. If it''s OT here, please let me know. I''ll try to do a little bit ASCII-Graphics to explain the topo better: _________ ________