similar to: OT Live Help Center

Hi list Does anyone know about a good howto setup nis and to make ad see it and use the usernames? Regards Per Qvindesland E-mail: per at norhex.com [1] http://www.linkedin.com/in/perqvindesland [2] Links: ------ [1] http://webmail.norhex.com/# [2] http://www.linkedin.com/in/perqvindesland -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi List I am hoping that someone here could perhaps give me a straight answer on a question that someone asked me today I have always belived that if you have 5 hard drives 1 50gb second 50gb third 20gb fourth 60gb firth 30gb that the largest would then be the size of the smallest disk, not 80 or 100 or 120 for that matter or am I wrong here? Regards? Per Qvindesland? -------------- next part

Any comments on CentOS 5 on Intel Atom CPUs? I need to build a couple of inexpensive systems that will be used primarily as gateway/firewall systems with OpenVPN, and need recommendations in reliable hardware platforms. These will need two NICs. Bill -- INTERNET: bill at celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice:

Thanks for your reply. I have a normal (../configure --enable-profiling --disable-optimized --enable-assertions) llvm debug+profile+assert build. I am generating llvm-bitcode using following commands. llvm-gcc -DLINUX_i386 -DSPEC_CPU2000 -O3 -emit-llvm 186.crafty/src/valid.c -c -o 186.crafty/src/valid.bc --- llvm-link 186.crafty/src/*.bc -o 186.crafty/186.crafty.rel.bc and finally: llc

Hello, I had problems with speed of Samba, so I was looking for some solution and I had discovered "use sendfile" configuration option. I was checking all Samba release notes and I had discovered, that from some version (older than is in CentOS repo) this option was turned on as default. So my question is, why in CentOS 5.3 is that option in default set to off? Thank you for responses

Hello, I am getting the following error while generating code for arm using llc for one of the specint2000 benchmark. Though same works for x86 target. Command => llc -march=arm 186.crafty/186.crafty.rel.bc -o 186.crafty/186.crafty.m5arm.s Error => LLVM ERROR: Couldn't allocate output reg for constraint '{cx}'! Have anyone seen this before? Is there a work around for this?

Hello > Command => llc -march=arm 186.crafty/186.crafty.rel.bc -o > 186.crafty/186.crafty.m5arm.s > Error =>  LLVM ERROR: Couldn't allocate output reg for constraint '{cx}'! > > Have anyone seen this before? It seems you're feeding x86-specific LLVM IR to arm backend. Please don't do that. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics

Hi, I have looked at the LLVM code generation quality using small test cases and in general it is better than I thought and in some cases better than gcc. However, there are still some gap in SPEC performance. I have not looked at the root cause of those gaps. Anyone who cares about LLVM performance need to take this seriously. For fair comparison, I used -fno-strict-aliasing in gcc to turn off

Thanks David. Unfortunately many of us cannot use GPL v3 gcc so it's hard for us to investigate this. One question, can you tell if gcc is inlining significantly more than llvm? We have reports that this is one of the issue plaguing eon performance. There are also some relatively well known spec optimizations that we haven't implemented. e.g.

Hi, guys, I am comparing the performance of the default scheduler (seems to be the one that minimizes register pressure) with no scheduler (-pre-RA-sched=none), and I got these numbers. The ratio is low_reg_pressure/none, that is, the lower the number, the better the performance with low register pressure: CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa 1.00 CFP2000/179.art/179.art

The mirrorlist entry in my Fedora-11 /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-update.repo reads: mirrorlist=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released- f$releasever&arch=$basearch As far as I can see, this means that yum is looking for the file metalink at mirrors.fedoraproject.org ? If I try "sudo yum update" I get: ----------------------------------- [tim at elizabeth ~]$

Hi, all I use llvm-gcc -O4 to compile SPEC 2000, some benchmarks can't be built successfully, such as 164.gzip, 175.vpr etc. The error messages are as follows. .. zh.o unlzw.o unpack.o unzip.o util.o zip.o -o gzip bits.o: file not recognized: File format not recognized collect2: ld returned 1 exit status specmake: *** [gzip] Error 1 specmake options 2> options.err |

Hi Ocsinventory http://www.ocsinventory-ng.org/ might be considered if not then I could also recommend Spacewalk http://www.redhat.com/spacewalk/? for something like this both runs well on Centos Per E-mail: per at norhex.com [1] http://www.linkedin.com/in/perqvindesland [2] --- Original message follows --- SUBJECT:?[CentOS] Tracking updates FROM: ?Martin Spinassi TO:?"CentOS mailing

On 2009-12-23 08:22, Li Shengmei wrote: > > Hi, all > > I use llvm-gcc –O4 to compile SPEC 2000, some benchmarks > can’t be built successfully, such as 164.gzip, 175.vpr etc. > > The error messages are as follows. > > > > …… > > zh.o unlzw.o unpack.o unzip.o util.o zip.o -o gzip > > bits.o: file not recognized: File format not recognized

On Nov 2, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Jon McLachlan wrote: > Hey folks, > > I am hoping that someone might be able to help me better understand > this design decision: For a 64 bit target, index's into GEP's of > arrays are zext up to 64 bit integers, even if the variable itself is > an alloca of only i32. Similarly, on a 32 bit target, index's into > GEP's are

Thank you for the responses! Hi Helmut, I actually prefer moving into a newer version that has all the great new features, but due to policies inside our firm it will be a long process. I find the idea of modifying the new version Samba to start up like the old version. Very crafty! :) Hi Volker, yes we do have a support contract with Red Hat and Oracle. The version we are currently using is

I have a machine here that resets itself every one hour (without my intention, of course): # cat /var/log/messages | grep "sith kernel: Linux version 2.6.18-128.1.16.el5" Jul 14 22:29:41 sith kernel: Linux version 2.6.18-128.1.16.el5 (mockbuild at builder16.centos.org) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-44)) #1 SMP Tue Jun 30 06:10:28 EDT 2009 Jul 14 23:30:09 sith kernel: Linux

Hi, Until now, I've only managed local user management on small network with no more than five or six machines, e. g. all user data stored locally on each and every machine (/etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, /etc/group). Now I'd like to learn remote identity management, that is, all user data stored centrally on one machine (so I don't have to wonder who has which UID and GID when I want

Hello List, I have installed Centos Directory Server to be able to authenticate with ldap on the other servers in the system, the directory server seems to be working fine, but when I configure a test server to authenticate up against this server then it says that there is no such user, I have made sure that the config is correct on the client /etc/ldap.conf is there also the

Hi list Does anyone know if there is a simple way to import standard linux users into the directory server? I have found some but they don't seem to be so flexible since I have to import from several servers into different ou's Regards Per Qvindesland