similar to: yum and /etc/redhat-release

Hi - is it possible to load a SMP version of a kernel on a system running a single CPU version of the kernel without a reboot? For instance, a quad CPU system was accidentally booted as 2.6.9-78.0.5.EL but we need to load 2.6.9-78.0.5.ELsmp instead. Any help would be appreciated. -- Article. VI. Clause 3 of the constitution of the United States states: "The Senators and

Hi - I've been asked to re-partition a Dell 120 GB 5400 RPM Encrypted Serial ATA Hard Drive and install CentOS 5 on the new partition. It's a Dell Lattitude E5400 laptop. Is this even possible with encrypted drives? Does CentOS 5 need special drivers? Any help would be greatly appreciated. -- Agile -- Article. VI. Clause 3 of the constitution of the United States states:

Hi - I have a ftp server running version 2.0.7 of vsftpd on a CentSO 5.2 server using iptables behind a Linksys router. The setup works for UNIX machines on either side of the Linksys router. For the Windows machines it only works if they're behind the Linksys router - ftp does NOT work if they're outside the Linksys router. I'd like to solve two problems: (1) make ftp work

Hi List, I am looking for java java 1.3.1 RPM for CentOS 4.5. I googled. I found below URL for it. http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/5773889/com/IBMJava2-JRE-1.3.1-12.i386.rpm.html R u okay with it. Your ideas Pls? -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya

My OQO boxes have the AR5413 wifi chipset, so for the first time in quite a while, I again need to run madwifi. So I went looking for the dkms madwifi rpms, but could not find them. They use to be on rpmforge, as I recall. dkms is there. So have I lost some memory cells or have these rpms taken a hike?

Hi, I have two servers in a drbd primary/secondary setup. Everything was fine until I had to reboot both servers. The primary rebooted first, the secondary assumed fine, but when the (old primary) server got back online it was unable to mount the drbd fs complaining about the modules. I've tried to find out the problem but the servers seem to have the same setup rpm -qa | grep drbd

Hi all, I am trying to get fail2ban going on my server and its log message reports the following error 2009-02-16 17:42:05,339 ERROR: 'iptables -L INPUT | grep -q fail2ban-SSH' returned 256 2009-02-16 17:42:05,354 ERROR: 'iptables -D INPUT -p tcp --dport ssh -j fail2ban-SSH Is this because of the way the RedHat tool sets up the firewall? Thanks for any responses. -- "The

Some people don't know how to conduct themselves on usenet and mailing lists. Despite the mailing list guidelines being crystal clear about no html posting and not top-posting we have people still doing so. People still use text-readers to access the mailing list so you could be denying access to these people by flouting the mailing list guidelines. This is an example of top-posting

Hi, RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built against Centos tree are available here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/ Regards, David Hrb??

I may need a strong shot of coffee but I though putting "hide files = /~*/" as follows in the samba config file would hide files with a tilde. [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes hide files = /~*/ Unfortunately after restarting the server the files are still visible. Regards, Vandaman.

There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5) and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind, or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs? If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could be offered by the CentOS community. Regards, Vandaman.

Unless I'm mistaken, does it look like Centos 4.7 is missing an update released on December 3rd 2008? Upstream details :- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0989.html An updated tmpwatch package that fixes various bugs is now available. The tmpwatch utility recursively searches through specified directories and removes files which have not been accessed in a specified period of time.

Karanbir Singh wrote: > And yea, working on setting up a sort of list to handle > much of this semi OT traffic. More news on that around > Wed next week, dint ask about it now. Off course people are going to ask. In my opinion as long as a topic is marked OT, it is preferable to one not marked but one in which the OP has not even done basic research on his problem. One distro had a

There's grub 0.97 on CentOS 5. The manual at http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/index.html says it is for 0.97. However, it mentions for instance a program grub-set-default that is not present in grub-0.97-13.2. It also mentions grub.conf options savedefault and fallback. Are these available in the CentOS grub? I tried with savedefault and it does not create a

Since my power problems that resulted in a re-install I have a problem which I've failed to locate up to now. The logs show daily.cld updated (version: 8950, sigs: 72593, f-level: 38, builder: ccordes) Database updated (510565 signatures) from db.gb.clamav.net (IP: 163.1.3.8) WARNING: Clamd was NOT notified: Can't connect to clamd through /tmp/clamd.socket I've been

Hey all, has anyone ever successfully implemented some form of OTP system with dovecot? Im looking at setting up an OATH/HOTP-TOTP based OTP for our services, but the webmail service (which uses dovecot) is a difficult one. Any info on implementations would be appreciated, Regards, Cor

In the yum priorities page on the wiki Akemi Yagi suggests http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities [base], [addons], [updates], [extras] ... priority=1 [centosplus],[contrib] ... priority=2 Third Party Repos ... priority=N (where N is > 10 and based on your preference) If you have rpmforge, kbs, epel all set up at 10 then wouldn't those also potentially overwrite

I have a choice of CentOS 4/5 and Fedora 9 on a laptop. I have not use CentOS 5 on a desktop but have used CentOS 4 and Fedora 9. I found the Fedora Gnome not as appealing as the CentOS 4 clearlooks. Any opinions from someone who has used CentOS 4/5 and Fedora? I'm not a KDE fan so KDE users need not reply. Regards, Vandaman.

Do people have wet underwear for nothing over XEN? See http://www.redhat.com/promo/qumranet/ <snip> Q: Will Red Hat continue to support and contribute to Xen? A: Yes. Red Hat will support Xen until at least 2014 (seven years after the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5). We are committed to insulating our customers from changes in the infrastructure components and this is why we

Do people have wet underwear for nothing over XEN? See http://www.redhat.com/promo/qumranet/ <snip> Q: Will Red Hat continue to support and contribute to Xen? A: Yes. Red Hat will support Xen until at least 2014 (seven years after the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5). We are committed to insulating our customers from changes in the infrastructure components and this is why we