similar to: Any problems in the CentOS Samba?

I've looked at the CentOS docs-list as well as the Wiki as I was interested in Samba. On one CentOS box I've got 3.0.32 (the latest bug-fixed version from Samba.org) and on another I've got 3.0.28 (the latest from upstream). The docs look almost the same and the docs refer to security = share. However 3.0.32 comes with a blank smb.conf making it harder to get a secure server up and

I posted this to the CentOS list and was advised to post here so here goes ... I've looked at the CentOS docs-list as well as the Wiki as I was interested in Samba. On one CentOS box I've got 3.0.32 (the latest bug-fixed version from Samba.org) and on another I've got 3.0.28 (the latest from upstream). The docs look almost the same and the docs refer to security = share. However

Perhaps with the release of the CentOS 4.7 Server CD the frontpage at www.centos.org could be updated to reflect this new development rather than 4.4? Here is the announcement for those who missed it http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2008-October/015328.html Spike. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam

On Thursday 23 July 2009 17:43, Tanya Lattner wrote: > We are experiencing serious load/memory issues on llvm.org and > unfortunately, there is not anything we can do about it. This means > that because the nightlytest page needs to access a mysql database, it > will be very very slow. Bugzilla will be slow too. Has there been a spike in traffic recently? Or maybe I just got lucky

Hello, we're experiencing an odd issue after combining two vDisks used for mail storage into one big new LVM. We've done this in the past successfully and didn't experience a lot of problems. We stopped all services (dovecot/postfix) to ensure that mailbox contents (Maildir) will not be changed, rsynch'ed the mail to the new disks and restarted everything. When we restarted

I've made some modifications to zttest in order to use it as a frame clock accuracy tester / slip detector. I'm not certain if that was it's original purpose, but it seems that a lot of folks try to use it that way. The result is something that I'm calling ztclock for now to help avoid confusion. I'm including the source at the end of this post. You can compile it by placing

Some thoughts on nbdkit and libnbd in RHEL Advanced Virtualization 8.3.0. We have two bugs open for rebases: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809231 "Rebase nbdkit to at least 1.18+ in RHEL AV 8.3.0" * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809674 "Rebase libnbd for RHEL-AV 8.3.0" The rules for rebasing are (well, these are _my_ rules): (1) Must not

'ello, I've looked all over the place for people with similar problems, but it seems i can't figure out how to discribe what is going on well enough to find any. Here are some screenshots of what i'm experiencing in the game Perfect World International. http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t76/injected666/ss3.jpg http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t76/injected666/ss2.jpg

I'm experiencing a strange problem on one RHEL4 system with Samba 3.0.20a. After restarting the Samba and Winbind services, the domain connection doesn't work any longer: # wbinfo --sequence HA02 : 1 BUILTIN : 1 CRT : DISCONNECTED Before restarting, I got: # wbinfo --sequence CRT : 254 The strange thing is that if I remove /etc/samba/secrets.tdb before (re)starting Samba, this

We are running Apache and Mongrel on RHEL4 and have been experiencing some interesting behaivor. Sometimes when someone logs into our application (it uses the acts_as_authencticaed and acl_system2) the following happens. Instead of the browser rendering the html and displaying all the form elements corretly as you would expect, it simple spews back the output without attempting to render. So

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 1:45 AM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There’s also some feature regressions in GH vs Phab. > > You *must* initiate a review via a pull request, and pull request by > definition compares your working copy against master. > > This is not very compatible with LLVMs approach to incremental > development. For

Hi, I had been experiencing a problem on our dedicated server running Centos 5, and unable to successfully track down the problem. Since about 6 days ago, I noticed a spike in load/CPU utilization which went from a typical 0.2x-0.3x to 3.x. At the same time, average traffic also went up and so did the log usage. Prior to this, the server was working fine and there had been no changes to the

Hi, I know I know: upstream minus artwork. Nevertheless, I admit I'd like to simply use the RHEL background wallpaper for my desktop. Something like: http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/linux/images/rhel4/44-Desktop.jpg Can't seem to find these (4 and 5). Any idea? Cheers, Niki

I am running Asterisk V 1.4.22 Twice during the last two days the Context Switches on our box has gone from about 7K to 80K in 2.5 hours. The load average would spike to 17, drop to 0.35 then spike again. When connecting to the console 'core show channels' will list the channels but not total calls. 'restart now' had no effect, the only way to stop Asterisk is to kill the

I have just finished deploying two Dell PowerEdge 1950s with CentOS 5.1 and Virtuozzo 4. GFS is up and running and Virtuozzo is configured for shared-storage clustering. Everything works adequately but I am wondering if anyone else has experienced load issues like I am seeing. I have three VEs/VMs running, two on one node and one on the other node. One of the VEs on each node are doing very little

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 4:23 PM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I use GH daily at my current employer and i can tell you that the issues with rebasing are very real. Unless you only use merge commits you are going to have a very bad time Would it be practical to use merge commits during review (never rebasing) & then rebasing/squashing to

and I should have probably mentioned... right after the event I unplugged the UPS's main and it went on battery, showing it had 11 mins worth of power left which is exactly what I'd expect on that load with full batteries. So the UPS "works" as expected, but then unplugging the cable would test a power dip, not a power spike, which si what I believe happened. thanks again, Spike

Hi, Since I upgraded from Asterisk 1.2.18 to 1.4.17 I've been experiencing high CPU utilization from the chan_sip module. I've notice the more sip peers I have loaded, the higher the CPU load goes when there are no active calls. I am currently using a Pentium 4 3.0Ghz with CentOS 4 Kernel 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL. I currently have 1558 sip peers loaded in Asterisk and the current CPU load is

On 6/22/20 2:34 AM, Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 1:45 AM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > There’s also some feature regressions in GH vs Phab. > > You *must* initiate a review via a pull request, and pull request > by definition compares your working

On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, nathan r. hruby wrote: > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, John Summerfield wrote: > > > nathan r. hruby wrote: > > > > > I have a user running RT on a RHEL4 machine. He recently did the RHEL4.4 > > > update and now it appears that the Tree::Simple module (a requirement of > > > RT) is broken, as it was built with weakref support that was in