similar to: DKIM

Hello Together Please i have new following Error, from DMARC Report, if i check my domain on example mxtoolbox i dont see any problems. Any from you know this Eror report, what i need to do to fix this issue? C:\folder>nslookup 94.237.32.243 Server: dns204.data.ch Address: 211.232.23.124 Name: wursti.dovecot.fi Address: 94.237.32.243

Hi, -- This message refers to the maillist itself rather than to dovecot software -- I have noticed that when I post to this list (only), I get DKIM Verification failure reports from: root at moncton.sidefx.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job 4D27B5DC4E on mail.sidefx.com") root at mail.rmacd.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job

In the same vein, I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org. Whenever I send a message to the mailing list or when my server sends a DMARC report, I'm getting a DMARC Forensic report. It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the the of a DMARC report) pass... Here is what I am getting : This is an authentication failure report for an email

I am sick of this gmail spam. Does anyone know a solution where I can do something like this: 1. received email from adcpni444 at gmail.com 2. system recognizes this email address has been 'whitelisted', continue with 7. 3. system recognizes as this email never been seen before 4. auto reply with something like (maybe with a wait time of x hours): Your message did not receive the

Hi Dear Community Friends, it is few days now, i am trying to figure out why DKIM is working / not working. Any assistance would be very much appreciable. Server IP is not blacklisted ever, MX, PTR SPF, DKIM records are available in DNS. why it is working at Gmail, why failing at Yahoo? Gmail dkim=pass header.i=@digital-infotech.net Yahoo: domainkeys=neutral (no sig);

Hello, Does anyone have a sample SELinux policy for dkim-milter? I'm using the configuration from this page: http://www.howtoforge.com/set-up-dkim-for-multiple-domains-on-postfix-with-dkim-milter-2.8.x-centos-5.3 Along with the latest RPM from the link on that page. Regards, Ben -- Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT

Dear Friends, is anyone is able to setup DKIM with FreeBSD 9.0 and Postfix? thanks / Prabhpal

Andr?, are you quite sure you have it working? In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot doesn?t have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by another Dovecot developer last September (it ?is being considered? was the answer then, see https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-September/112887.html). I am using LMTP to deliver mail to Dovecot from

Hi guys, when I send e-mails to CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>, I received DMARC / DKIM failure reports. Is it possible to solve this problem and if so how? This is the first report: This is an email abuse report for an email message received from IP 208.100.23.70 on Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:56:25 +0200. The message below did not meet the sending domain's DMARC policy. For

I am trying to install dkim-milter-2.7.2 on a Centos 5.2 system and keep getting the following errors. I have very little experience in C programing so I am at a loss as how to proceed. I have sendmail-devel installed Here is the tail of the result output of sh ./Build make[2]: cc: Command not found make[2]: *** [assert.o] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory

If I don't get swamp of errors with this email, I'll stop the From munging starting tomorrow. There is now ARC signing done for mails. Lets see how this works, if we can stop rewriting from I'll be happy. Aki

Hate to ask, but after reading the last few months of centos history online I am worried. And to learn the lead guy seems to have absconded with the cash and left all the hard working devs high and dry..well that is scary. They all worked so hard and who knows what will happen now. If centos falls I have no choice but to go to redhat. I am wondering if the conversion will be easy or a complete

Hello, Thanks to some nice people on here and other forums I have pretty much finalized my whole mail system on centos 6.x. With all the checks, greylisting, dev/null of any 8+ spam level SA, I still get a few mails. It seems like everytime I enable a new protectant, the mail stops spamming for a few hours...then the spammers decide I am worthy of using better methods against me..and more

I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Nielsen [mailto:sebastian at sebbe.eu] Sent: donderdag 11 juni 2020 10:23 To: Marc Roos; 'dovecot'; 'users' Subject: SV: handling spam from

Hello Mike, Yes, I am using a static IP address, but in theory, you could use a dynamic one. Nothing technically would prevent email exchanges between two boxes, as long as the SPF records are up to date and the DKIM is properly setup. Unfortunately, some ISPs are simply blacklisting full range of private IP addresses just because they are not officials / commercials. Kind regards, Andr? On

On 10/02/2019 07:38, Ralph Seichter via dovecot wrote: > * Juri Haberland via dovecot: > >> Blindly enabling DMARC checks without thinking about the consequences >> for themselves should not be the problem of other well behaving >> participants. > > Can you judge if DMARC is enabled "blindly"? No, I thought not. Also, > the issue was not on the

Not sure if there is an app like this yet. I want to keep tabs on my web applications and thought of using a 'page checker'/ I was thinking either running a sum on the directory or each file...but thinking a simple date check would be fine. The idea is web application, except the uploads area for photos, never has changes to its files except when I change it. However, if it gets

I put this page together just so I won't spam the board anymore begging for help..lol http://bobhoffman.com/vmissue.html This shows a working effort of bonded eths, bridged into a vm, and a few other things. The only missing thing is something on the host that ends up putting the VM internet connection into some kind of limbo. Whether it is hardware related, bug related, libvirt nat

Hi all, We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and outlook.com in particular. It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow domains to publish policies as to

Hi all, We have hit another step change in aggressive anti-spam techniques from major mail providers. Over the past few days, we saw a huge spike in the number of mails we were failing to deliver to GMail and outlook.com in particular. It looks like it is now no longer acceptable for us to break DMARC/DKIM/SPF. These are DNS-based extensions to SMTP, which allow domains to publish policies as to