similar to: vtun -- no IPv6 support?

I need vtun working over IPv6. The version from rpmforge does not seem to support IPv6 (binds to 0.0.0.0:5000 if I specify binding to the interface, and won't let me put in an IPv6 address for address binding). So I was pointed to the KAME (which does not provide any FC/RHEL support. The person who sent me there provided a makefile that he said works on Linux, but did not work for me:

Just spotted this on the VTun mailing list. Might be interesting, if there were a TUN/TAP driver for windows it would be a lot easier to make a M$ port of tinc. Not that I feel much motivation to do so... ----- Forwarded message from Michael Heyse <mh@designassembly.de> ----- From: "Michael Heyse" <mh@designassembly.de> To: "VTun mailing list"

Hi. I have CentOS 4, and I download packets vtun and zlib for RHEL4 from DAG RPM... (rpmfind) I am configure VTUN for a ip tunnel, and when configure vtund, the tun interface not appears up, how i do to the tun device appears up when i do a "ifconfig"? the vtun services appears up, and ok, without errors, and the configuration files, is a knowed configuration from other server that

As was accidently posted here earlier by Ralf :-), you should be aware of this issue: http://vuxml.freebsd.org/d8769838-8814-11d8-90d1-0020ed76ef5a.html racoon fails to verify signature during Phase 1 Affected packages racoon < 20040407b Details VuXML ID d8769838-8814-11d8-90d1-0020ed76ef5a Discovery 2004-04-05 Entry 2004-04-07 Ralf Spenneberg discovered a serious

Hi all, I'm trying to get a glusterfs cluster working inside Amazon's EC2. I'm using the official ubuntu 8.10 images. I've compiled glusterfs-2, but I'm using the in-kernel fuse module as the instances run 2.6.27-3, and the fuse module from glusterfs won't compile against something that recent. For my test setup I'm trying to get AFR working over two servers, with

It''s time again for your monthly cgi.rb DOS vulnerability. This latest vulnerability is different from the one that cgi_multipart_eof_fix.gem fixed. This one is related to the boundary taken from the web client being used incorrectly. You can read about the vulnerability: http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2006/12/04/another-dos-vulnerability-in-cgi-library The applicable PATCH is

On 13 Aug 2001, "William F. Maton" <wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca> wrote: > On 13 Aug 2001, Heikki Vatiainen wrote: > > > The rsync daemon we use is plain 2.4.6 patched with KAME rsync patch > > rsync-246-v6-20000907.diff.gz [1]. It looks like there is a good > > possibility to get IPv6 merged in, since just today a rsync developer > > was asking if

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-04:06.ipv6 Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: setsockopt(2) IPv6 sockets input validation error Category: core Module: kernel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-04:06.ipv6 Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: setsockopt(2) IPv6 sockets input validation error Category: core Module: kernel

>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Janos Mohacsi >Organization: NIIF/HUNGARNET >Confidential: no >Synopsis: pf does not use IPv6 interface addresses at startups >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Category: bin >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD scone.ki.iif.hu 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #23: Wed May 9 18:23:24

Hi: I would like to know how can i bridge traffic between 2 lans over the internet, if posible i prefer to do this using kernel features instead of userspace app of course encryption is desirable but not a most since i can set iptables rules to limit traffic thanks in advance for any comment or help on this Victor __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo!

Hi, I've been encountering some problems with bridging under linux 2.6.12-9 (ubuntu Breezy Badger). Apologies for the newbie-ish email: problem is likely a config issues, but docs appear to be sparse and I can't find much reference to the problem/solution on the 'net; trial and error really isn't working... Am attempting to bridge an offsite network to the central

TITLE: KAME Project "ipcomp6_input()" Denial of Service CRITICAL: Moderately critical IMPACT: DoS WHERE: >From remote DESCRIPTION: A vulnerability has been reported in the KAME Project, which can be exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service). The vulnerability is caused due to an error within the "ipcomp6_input()" function in

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram] |<-----------------| host1 IPv6 address : fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe6f:dfa0 host2 IPv6 address :

Device model path cleanup. Remove bochsrc which is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com> --- a/tools/examples/xmexample.vmx Thu Jun 30 18:41:11 2005 +++ b/tools/examples/xmexample.vmx Thu Jun 30 18:59:08 2005 @@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ # New stuff -device_model = ''/usr/bin/qemu-dm'' +device_model = ''/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm''

If this is the same test: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/cond1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1, then it doesn't fail for me on Mac OS 10.8 with ASan (Clang r168632) Have you tried symbolizing the report? On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com> wrote: > Jack, can you please upload this test somewhere?

Hi, I looked at CVS and this mailing list and didn't find anything regarding IPv6 support. I found old patches from KAME and one IPv6-only implementation (http://www.bugfactory.org/~gav/ipv6/icecast-1.3.11-ipv6.diff.gz) only. Therefore I decided to do this work again and as good as possible. I integrated IPv6 into configure script which allows to use te same code both for IPv4 and IPv6

I'm probably thinking way too hard on this... but I've already got a headache. I've setting up a VPN for a client between two sites. Someone had recommended vtun, so I gave it a try. I was VERY put off by the lack of decent documentation. I _think_ I got a VPN set up between the two sites, but it wasn't working right and I gave up because the documentation sucked. So, then I

Hello, I have two hosts with a tunnel closed by vtun, when I reboot a host, the other show the error bellow. unregister_netdevice: waiting for tun0 to become free. Usage count = 6 OS version: CentOS 5.4 Vtund version: vtun-3.0.2-1 some idea about? Thanks -- Daniel Bruno http://danielbruno.eti.br danielbruno at projetofedora.org

This should have gone here and not to #706233. Patch will obviously need rebasing by now... ----- Forwarded message from Ian Campbell <ijc at hellion.org.uk> ----- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:56:49 +0100 From: Ian Campbell <ijc at hellion.org.uk> To: 706233 at bugs.debian.org Cc: control at bugs.debian.org Subject: move core dumps to /var/lib/xen/dump X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9