similar to: RPM Uninstall

Before I submit as a bug, has anyone else encountered -- doing a fresh, clean install of CentOS-3 results in a resolv.conf with only my secondary nameserver listed and the search domain. The install works fine, the eth0 and eth1 (onboard e100's) are detected, all the right info entered, etc -- typical by the book textmode (not GUI) install that I'd normally do with RH9/RHEL3. Static

According to http://www.rpm.org/api/4.4.2.2/specfile.html a Version: tag can contain a hyphen, as the tarball for the source I am compiling is named 2.3-pre4 etc. When I try to build it I get an error about the illegal char? Anyone know about the discrepancy between the docs and RHEL's rpmbuild? Without recreating a new tarball and bungling the name how does one gracefully handle this?

Hi Currently devs check code into perforce and we have to checkout > package > update repo > deploy I know this could be scripted but are there any tools out there that can take code from a repository and build rpm's in a continuous integration type manner? I have been hunting around for such a tool and so far not seeing anything obvious as i dont want to reinvent the wheel if

I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an NFS filesystem. I sorta-kinda remember this when going from 5.1 to 5.2, but that memory is hazy. -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/

I followed the setup instructions from http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/ (link from the Centos wiki). All this is done on another 'clean' system, so I have to read the terminal screen there and tell what went wrong here. I then followed my colleague's instructions to get the tar, untar, autogen, configure, and finally make rpm. Well it was that make rpm command that finally

When I try to use "Uninstall Wine Software" it does nothing. Some applications seem to uninstall but they remain on the list and on the disk. Others, namely Office 2007, will not even pretend to uninstall. How do I get rid of them?

Hi list, I'm trying to create an asterisk 1.8 rpm with SRTP. I found mention of a libsrtp rpm, <http://qutecom.ipex.cz/RPMS/srtp-1.4.4-1.i386.rpm > in these instructions, <http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SRTP> but it is unreachable (by me, anyway). The libSRTP source is here, <http://srtp.sourceforge.net/download.html>. Has this already been packaged for

Some threads just go on too long. Personally I think a troll has hijacked the main centos list again and is inducing food fight behaviours while that troll perfectly 'innocently' asserting that it is just respoding to all email. see: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645 for a discussion of the problem of 'capture' in FOSS projects. But if one loses

Hi Ashish, On 09/02/15 17:50, Ashish Yadav wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Graeme Russ <gruss at tss-engineering.com > <mailto:gruss at tss-engineering.com>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've configured a Fedora 20 server with samba to share a few user > directories and a printer. > > From a Windows 8 laptop, I am able

I seem to be having network and email issues tonight; please excuse any duplication -- Russ herrold -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 HTML dump on Thu Jul 30 00:30:33 EDT 2009 http://www.centos.org/ Open Letter to Lance Davis July 30, 2009 04:39 UTC This is an Open Letter to Lance Davis from fellow CentOS Developers It is regrettable that we are forced

Added an entry to http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General : 23. How do I provide appropriate information about my system when asking questions? Comments, corrections, and other (constructive :-) ) criticisms are hereby solicited. Phil

Installed a 30 day trial of Adobe Acrobat 7.0 and I'm now trying to "properly" uninstall. I run "uninstaller" and the program shows up in the list of installed programs. In Uninstaller: click on the program description to highlight it and then clicking the Uninstall tab causes the hard drive to wobble about a bit, the program becomes un-highlighted and the uninstaller

Full_Name: Gerhard Thallinger Version: R 2.2.0 through R 2.6.2 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (129.27.145.220) The uninstall key in the Windows Registry (HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\) is the same ("R for Windows_is1") for all R versions (at least from 2.2.0 to 2.6.2). This prohibits managing multiple R versions in a clean way, since the

Hi All, I am currently using R version 2.8.1 on linux cent os 4.4 (i386) and want to upgrade to version 2.9.1. It seems to me that version-2.9.1 is it not for my OS. Am I right? Regards Utkarsh [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

installed wine 0.9.60.tar.bz2 to /usr/local/wine ./configure --verbose make depend # make install then went thru wineconfig and it was working but kept getting error and ole errors. so I want to uninstall wine and get wine 1.0, but when I try to uninstall wine there is no /usr/local/wine there is only bin games include lib man sbin share src directories. If I go to bin and try to uninstall

Under Windows 2000 I installed R 1.4.0 some time ago. I then installed R 1.4.1 just now. If I hit the Windows Start button select Programs from the menu that appears select R from the menu that appears then I get a menu with R 1.4.0 R 1.4.1 R 1.4.0 Help R 1.4.1 Help Uninstall R for Windows If I select Uninstall R for Windows it uninstalls R 1.4.1 but I want to uninstall 1.4.0 .

All: Attached is the output file from building R 2.10.0 on RedHat Linux. I have never previously experienced any problems when building R from source with new releases. But, now I get a compile error with the Matrix package: CHOLMOD/Include/cholmod.h:87:22: error: UFconfig.h: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [CHMfactor.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory

I've recently downloaded the newest version of WINE available fro WINE HQ (which would be 1.1.24 at the time of this writing), but I am having problems uninstalling the previous version. Whenever I type "make uninstall", I get the error listed in the subject. I've tried this in different directories, but I still get the same error. Even "make install" or "make

I'm a little unconfortable with the way the privsep user is created in the RedHat spec files. In particular the way a fixed UID is specified. Now it looks (from a glance at the apache/bind spec file) that it is 'the way it is done' - but is there a register of these numbers somewhere? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett abartlet at pcug.org.au

Ok so your saying to just remove the redhat-lsb rpm. But, am I suppose to have that rpm for some reason...i can eliminate more packages from my system if i do remove the redhat-lsb rpm. I just though it was a required back that shouldnt be removed from the system...