similar to: RADVD and default IPv6 gateway

On 4/28/2020 3:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > - gateway sends a router solicitation and gets a router advertisement > with "stateful config" set, which tells gateway to do DHCPv6 (but > default route comes from RA) I'm not seeing any outbound IPv6 traffic from my CentOS 7 box on the WAN interface. I do see RA's emitting from the LAN interface, from radvd. Is there

So I had dhcp, radvd and bind working together nicely and now I threw in a wrench of setting up an AD DC I want to change my dhcp server setting to put client's into the new AD Domain but am a little hesitant as it is all working so nicely with DDNS I'm starting to think all I need to do is edit just my dhcpd.conf and change occurrences of DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD to

I am using RADVD to assign IPv6 addresses. It works for 'static' devices. I want it to work for devices that move to different networks without having to restart the network on those devices. So if I have a notebook on network Lab1 getting prefix 2607:7:4:1::64 and moves to network Lab2 where RADVD advertises prefix 2607:7:4:2::/64, I want the host to switch to the new address.

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1743 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1743.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 2f483d1126f4dd5e6dda88c60e5e79b756a5fddbaafbaed343eea7f6712fc733 radvd-1.9.2-9.el7.x86_64.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:1391 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:1391 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 7445111d2f078d2a8d3625f87a4d0c2d9d08ec972c2cd5fe4e84d41ceeabfd86 radvd-1.9.2-9.el7_5.4.x86_64.rpm Source:

I just got 50 Mbps symmetric fiber from AT&T and it includes a /56 of IPv6 addresses, replacing a much slower ADSL line. I never tried to get IPv6 working on the old connection. I'm using CentOS 7 as a gateway and it's worked great for several versions for IPv4. I'm not seeing any IPv6 default route on the WAN interface. I suspect I'm not getting route announcements. I

I had left my config alone for now and dhcp still writes to DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. But samba has been complaining about not being able to write to bind in its zone. [2016/05/27 07:30:06.738434, 0] ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295: Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL If you are right about it using kerberos I think I am

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 27/05/16 17:11, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD >> helped me find that I needed to add >> >> options { >> [...] >> tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; >>

https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD helped me find that I needed to add options { [...] tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; [...] }; That seems to have fixed my errors with DNS On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 27/05/16 14:37, Jeff Sadowski wrote: >

Hi, Why modifying a working conf when you can build your DC on others systems (VM)? That could be really nice to learn but you add a lot of complexity in your process, I think. Why not using DLZ to access your AD zones? I expect Bind to be able to mix its behaviour: flat file for some zone, DLZ for others... Now regarding: update-policy { grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD ms-self *

On 27/05/16 14:37, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > I had left my config alone for now and dhcp still writes to > DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. But samba has been complaining about not being able > to write to bind in its zone. > > [2016/05/27 07:30:06.738434, 0] > ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) > ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295: Failed DNS update - >

On 27/05/16 17:11, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD helped > me find that I needed to add > > options { > [...] > tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; > [...] > }; > That seems to have fixed my errors with DNS > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Rowland

Hello, I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the following guide, unsuccessfully: https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/06/16/providing-ipv6-connectivity-to-virtual-guests-with-libvirt-and-kvm/ . I have the following config files: dumpxml of the guest `deb`: http://sprunge.us/iUef net-dumpxml of network `default`: http://sprunge.us/WTfH net-dumpxml of network `ip6`:

On 09/03/2015 04:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 03.09.2015 um 22:09 schrieb Robert Moskowitz: >> dhcp is working. but what does this mean: >> >> Sep 03 15:58:44 homebase.home.htt dhcpd[22993]: Not searching LDAP since >> ldap-server, ldap-port and ldap-base-dn were not specified in the config >> file > > what it says - nothing in 99.9% of all

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >> following guide, unsuccessfully: >> https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/06/16/providing-ipv6-connectivity-to-virtual-guests-with-libvirt-and-kvm/

On 10/5/2014 1:56 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 21:13, The Cop wrote: >> On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >>> On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >>>> following guide, unsuccessfully: >>>> >>

Hi, I need to change ownership of server files to user/group defined in active directory ( using rfc2307 and unix attributes). Chown returns no error, but 'ls -lia' shows that file ownership is unchanged. What am I doing wrong? archive-test:/archive/video # ls -lia ./test.mp4 17121 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2413096 ноя 2 19:50 ./test.mp4 archive-test:/archive/video # wbinfo -u

Hi Michael, when I was looking for information on tinc in combination with IPv6, I also found your new tutorial at that time (earlier this month). Somehow a couple of things are less clear to me in the newer tutorial (maybe the nice network topology image is missing). OK, you added the unique local addresses to the setup. But I dont't get it how the routing is done in your setup. You

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > On 4/28/2020 3:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > >- gateway sends a router solicitation and gets a router advertisement > > with "stateful config" set, which tells gateway to do DHCPv6 (but > > default route comes from RA) > > I'm not seeing any outbound IPv6 traffic from my CentOS 7