similar to: LVM and ext3 filesystem question

I've developed a function for updating Flac metadata blocks inside Ogg files. Obviously it is desirable to use padding so that most edits don't require rewriting massive files. Although the flac encoder creates a padding metadata block by default in Ogg Flac files, this appears to be useless. When packets on an Ogg page change size, the page size may change by as different amount, hence

Anybody know a way to enlarge a filesystem ext3 without having to unmounted it, when they are still space left in the volume group (when using LVM) ? I will be running large production linux system running Oracle. I can't stop the database everytime I have to enlarge a filesystem. We can do it with all others filesystems (JFS, REISERSFS and XFS) when they are created in a volume group. Why

Hi, Is mke2fs' stride option relevant for a multi-striped LVM volume? Cheers, Stephen

We are having problems remounting an ext3 filesystem using an external journal device. The filesystem in question was working fine until the server was rebooted. This is what we see on dmesg when trying to mount: EXT3: failed to claim external journal device. The external journal lives on a LVM2 logical volume and it seems to be accessible ( we can dumpe2fs and see filesystem information).

Hello, I am currently running R on ubuntu and everything is working perfectly fine. However, I would like to connect to R via Windows using Eclipse StatEt plugin. Is this possible to do? or do I have to have a version of R running on Windows also? I prefer to have Linux do the heavy lifting and Windows Eclipse to be a sort of GUI. Any thoughts?

I'm setting up a new fileserver. It has two RAID controllers, a PERC 3/DI providing mirrored system disks and a PERC 3/DC providing a 1TB RAID5 volume consisting of eight 144GB U160 drives. This will serve NFS, Samba and sftp clients for about 200 users. The logical drive was created with the following settings: RAID = 5 stripe size = 32kb write policy = wrback read policy =

We have about 800 CentOS 5.2 servers and our university. We use NFS being served from over 10 NetApp frames. We use autofs for to mount up our partitions. There have been times where we can't cd into the directory. It says the directory does not exist. On some servers it works but on others it does not. Typically we restart amd and autofs to resolve this issue. But sometimes it does not even

Hello, I understand the need for a proper stride setting when formatting a filesystem on a RAID device. However, is there any problem in using a stride setting when formatting a filesystem on a regular non-RAID, non-SSD, just plain-vanilla-single-disk block device? I'm sure there isn't any benefit to it, but I'm curious if there is any harm. The reason I ask is I'm looking at

All, I'm requesting comments from the expert readers of ext3-users on these notes for tuning ext3 for performance. Most helpful would be feedback pertinent to RHEL 5; as XFS isn't supported under Red Hat Enterprise Linux these items are an attempt to match XFS performance with ext3. These items were culled from a number of sources. Will they be effective for achieving the performance

We use Microsoft Outlook heavy at school but our backed is CentOS. I use echo "Foo" | mail -s "subject" addr at unc.edu a lot. Is it possible to change the priority to High so Outlook will understand it? The priority meaning the email will be sent to the normal email queue but on Outlook it would have the exclamation point. TIA

Sorry for the spam. Copy-paste didn't capture the Subject properly. Resending with the correct Subject so that the thread is captured properly. -----Original Message----- From: Saito, Hideki Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 1:39 PM To: 'llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org' <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] [Proposal][RFC] Strided Memory Access Ashutosh, First,

WE have a centos 5.3 install, and our server is keep getting hacked. We see load averages of 500+ and see people from all over the world logging into our server (used last). Is there a good place to start to avoid these kinds of things? For example, here is what I already did. Open up sshd port only setup iptables to only accept port 80 and 22 No FTP No other ports are allowed according to IP

I agree that a single vector index is sufficient for many cases. Matt Pharr (from the ISPC compiler), showed me an interesting case where there is a single pointer into an array. In this case we need to have two indices, where the first index is zero. Once the basic patch is in, we can start looking at adding support for arrays and multiple indices. Nadav -----Original Message----- From: David

The driver doesn't consider framebuffer pitch and offset, leading to a wrong display in case offset != 0 or pitch != width * bpp. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_hw.c | 14 ++++++++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c | 3 ++- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Dear all, In our compiler we use a modified version LLVM Polly, which is very sensitive to proper code generation. Among the number of limitations, the loop region (enclosed by phi node on induction variable and branch) is required to be free of additional memory-dependent branches. In other words, there must be no conditional "br" instructions below phi nodes. The problem we are facing

I''ve looked long and hard for an answer to this and am stuck. I have setup a Windows XP DomU on Xen 3.2-1 running on Debian and I can connect fine to the instance via VNC but I get no networking within the windows instance as it says the IP address conflicts with another on the network. All my linux instances network fine, and I''m confused as to the issue. Can anybody provide

>Vectorizer's output should be as clean as vector code can be so that analyses and optimizers downstream can >do a great job optimizing. Guess I should clarify this philosophical position of mine. In terms of vector code optimization that complicates the output of vectorizer: If vectorizer is the best place to perform the optimization, it should do so. This includes the cases like

A simple combination of delta-encoding and run_length-encoding is one of the first schemes we experimented with (32-bit entries with 24-bit 'delta' and an 8-bit 'count'). This gave really good results, but as Sri mentions, we observed several cases where the relative relocations were not on consecutive offsets. There were common cases where the relocations applied to alternate

One common concern raised for cases where Loop Vectorizer generate bigger types than target supported: Based on VF currently we check the cost and generate the expected set of instruction[s] for bigger type. It has two challenges for bigger types cost is not always correct and code generation may not generate efficient instruction[s]. Probably can depend on the support provided by below RFC by

Hello All, I have been using rsync to backup several filesystems by using Mike Rubel's hard link method (http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/). The problem is, I am backing up a lot of ASCII .log, csv, and .txt files. These files are large and can range anywhere from 1GB to 30GB. I was wondering if on the target side (the backup side), if I can use some sort of compression. I