similar to: Centos on new intel processor

Hi All I have a windows application that calls a function ( approximately 10000 times) exported by a third party DLL. I have two machines ( one with Intel pentium 4 processor and other with Intel Xeon processor ) with RHEL 4.0 installed on both of these machine. If I execute the windows application on the first machine (one with Intel

My hardware is: CPU: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU E3845 @ 1.91GHz and it supports EIST(Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology). OS: CentOS 7(kernel-3.10) When I set the BIOS options "CPU configuration >> EIST" to "enable", it appears a kernel panic when the system is starting up. Here is what I am seeing: ...... Fast TSC calibration failed. [Hardware Error] CPU 3: Machine Check

This problem is so damn weird and frustrating that I thought it would be worthwhile to post this solution for anyone who may run into this situation in the future, since I was unable to find any mention of this after much searching, and no error messages appear in any logfiles that I could find either. This applies to a machine with a Atom Processor D4xx/D5xx/N4xx/N5xx Integrated Graphics

On 05/11/2017 12:45 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >>> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >>> >>> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >>> >>> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >>> >>>

Hi, I am trying to install centos on the intel D945GCLF board. It's a mini-ITX board with the atom processor and it uses the Realtek RTL8102EL LAN chipset. When I disable the on-board LAN card it installs and runs OK, but when I enable it, I get kernel panic at boot. The board runs perfectlj with Fedora 9 (with the latest kernel) or with Ubuntu server. My question is: is there some way

On 29/03/2020 14:31, Patrick DERWAEL wrote: > Hi Phil > > Here it is: > > > [root at totorbex ~]# lspci -nn > .00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium > Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series SoC Transaction Register [8086:2280] > (rev 21) > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation > Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor

Hi Phil Here it is: [root at totorbex ~]# lspci -nn .00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series SoC Transaction Register [8086:2280] (rev 21) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:22b1] (rev 21) 00:10.0 SD Host controller

> Here's mine. Interesting differences: If you disable Intel Speedstep in the BIOS it should lock the CPU to its fastest speed, but you lose power saving during idle. On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:48 PM, ken <gebser at mousecar.com> wrote: > On 05/11/2017 12:45 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>:

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:13:43AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Use the new atomic iterator macros, the old ones are about to be > removed. With the new macros, it's more easy to get old and new state so > get them from the macros instead of from obj->state. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com> > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs

HI all : I got the message "Using timer interrupt." when trying the command "opcontrol --list-events". then I found infomation "xenoprof: Initialization failed. Intel processor model 44 for P6 class family is not supported“ after "xm dmesg". the TYPE OF CPUS here is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz. So does it really not support this

Just built myself a little test server with an Atom 230 processor in it and am quite impressed with it so-far. Wondering is anyones used one in anger for a VoIP platform? I'm after something with a bit more oomph than the VIAs I'm currently using that I can use in a small box (mini ATX size) without going full-blown Xeons, etc. Cheers, Gordon

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6

Has anyone successfully compiled pnmath (http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~luke/R/experimental ) for an intel processor running mac OS 10.5? When I attempt to do so via the R package installer (choosing "Local Source Package" and pointing to the pnmath_0.0-2.tar.gz file), I get the following errors: * Installing *source* package 'pnmath' ... ** libs ** arch - i386 gcc -arch i386

Agreed: Should have read "socket A" semprons, since these are the most common currently although rapidly disappearing... >*1* type of Sempron is an Athlon XP processor, the Socket-462 >versions. With the Socket-754, it is an Athlon 64, although >most have their 64-bit functions disabled. Only the lastest, >specifically branded Sempron 64 have the same, full

I've just got bunch of RHEL4 erratas (looks like U2 is out). Looking at the kernel errata (kernel-2.6.9-22.EL), one of the things in list of new features is "Intel dual core support". What does this exactly means? Does it mean if I have dual core pentium processor and use older kernel that it will use only one core, and I need newer kernel to use both cores? Or is it only

I am seeing ``APIC error on CPU3: 60(60)'' warnings from dmesg periodically on a CentOS 5.4 box, kernel 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5. The CPU is an Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz. I am not a hardware type, and don't have a clue what this means. This is occurring while an rsync-3.0.4 process is receiving data sent by a machine running rsync-3.0.7 (I just updated the CentOS box to

Hi every one, I am trying to load a custom kernel with Syslinux on special purpose pc. Surprisingly Syslinux-4.06 boots my kernel, initrd and finally the OS perfectly from an SD-Card. The problem arises when I use the Syslinux-6.03 where the syslinux hangs right at the beginning After I see the message 'Loading vmLinuz0 ...' I read a few posts on your forums and figured out it has to do

Hi I would like to ask you which processor is beter solution for router? Please shortly explain why? I have about 800 users. For each I create 2 htb classes and 4 filters. Moreower router have dhcp serwer and lots of iptables rules. I''m interested in P4 3Ghz HT and AMD Athlon 64 3000+. What is beter choice for my needs? What parametrs of processors are important: clock, cache, fsb

These show up under Windows XP as if they are SCSI adapters (they're not, obviously.) Has there been any view towards supporting these on FreeBSD? They're on all the recent Intel motherboards for the last year and a half or so. Also, is there any particular benefit (or penalty) to running the amd64 build on Quad-Core or i7-series processors? I have an app that might benefit from

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jiong Wang" <jiwang at tilera.com> > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 6:09:20 PM > Subject: [LLVMdev] RFC: TileGX, a new backend for Tilera's many core processor > > Hi, > > On behalf of Tilera Corporation,