similar to: Device renaming heads up

On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 22/09/15 22:37, Jo Rhett wrote: >> Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM version at https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8&sr=0-2&qid=1442957668341 >> >> We have prepurchased reserved instances based on

On 30/07/15 00:20, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 07/29/2015 04:53 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> the biggest blocker to going GA on the x86 build is the kernel; the >> distro kernel we end up with isnt going to be the same as the upstream >> x86_64 kernel configs. However, there hasent been a huge level of >> feedback ( either positive or negative ) around those builds. So if

On 07/29/2015 04:53 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > the biggest blocker to going GA on the x86 build is the kernel; the > distro kernel we end up with isnt going to be the same as the upstream > x86_64 kernel configs. However, there hasent been a huge level of > feedback ( either positive or negative ) around those builds. So if you > are using it, or are interested in using it - do

On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Right, I just meant which specific header files should move. Pass manager > doesn't seem like it should, for example. > lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp indicates to me that include/llvm/PassManager.h should become include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h It feels like what you're really interested in is

Sounds great, thanks Chandler. In addition to each file being discussed, it would be nice to have a high level plan to kick things off. -Chris On Dec 21, 2012, at 10:24 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello folks, > > Now that the includes are sortable and I have another chunk of free time, I'll be making another attempt at the mass renaming from

On 29/07/15 22:04, Peter wrote: > On 07/30/2015 07:13 AM, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: >> >> BTW do you have any news about the CentOS 7 32-bit, discussed some time >> around CentOS 7 release? > > Yes, there's a beta out for the past month or so: > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html > the biggest blocker to going GA on the x86 build

Hi, On 22/09/15 22:37, Jo Rhett wrote: > Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM version at https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8&sr=0-2&qid=1442957668341 > > We have prepurchased reserved instances based on older PV machines (m1, c1, etc) It would be very very helpful to have a PV AMI so we could

On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org <mailto:mail-lists at karan.org>> wrote: >> On 22/09/15 22:37, Jo Rhett wrote: >>> Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM version at https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8&sr=0-2&qid=1442957668341

Right, I just meant which specific header files should move. Pass manager doesn't seem like it should, for example. -Chris On Dec 23, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> Sounds great, thanks Chandler. In addition to each file being discussed, it would be

Hello folks, Now that the includes are sortable and I have another chunk of free time, I'll be making another attempt at the mass renaming from VMCore to IR for LLVM. I'm also planning to move the header files currently in the top level for LLVM down into the appropriate subdirectory. I'll create an IR directory for the headers that really belong to that library component. However,

On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Sounds great, thanks Chandler. In addition to each file being discussed, > it would be nice to have a high level plan to kick things off. > What exact plan are you looking for? >From the original thread: - lib/VMCore -> lib/IR - include/llvm/Foo.h -> include/llvm/IR/Foo.h (if Foo.h belongs

R Verzonden met mijn Windows Phone ________________________________ Van: centos-virt-request at centos.org<mailto:centos-virt-request at centos.org> Verzonden: ?6-?12-?2013 09:35 Aan: centos-virt at centos.org<mailto:centos-virt at centos.org> Onderwerp: CentOS-virt Digest, Vol 76, Issue 3 Send CentOS-virt mailing list submissions to centos-virt at centos.org To subscribe or

Hello, Re: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7-Beta/html/7.3_Release_Notes/bug_fixes_general_updates.html Are there any upcoming plans for turning off the use of legacy interface names in the next official CentOS 7.x AMI? Currently, both the official RHEL 7.3 GA AMI and the latest available official CentOS-7 x86_64 AMI use legacy interface names via either:

hi, Just wondering if people had started using i386 Xen DomU's on a x86_64 dom0 machine with 5.1 as yet ? And just wondering what their experiences have been. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq

On 07/30/2015 07:13 AM, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: > > BTW do you have any news about the CentOS 7 32-bit, discussed some time > around CentOS 7 release? Yes, there's a beta out for the past month or so: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html Peter

On 04/11/16 11:18, Jinesh Choksi wrote: > Hello, > > Re: > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7-Beta/html/7.3_Release_Notes/bug_fixes_general_updates.html > > Are there any upcoming plans for turning off the use of legacy interface > names in the next official CentOS 7.x AMI? > > Currently, both the official RHEL 7.3 GA AMI and the

Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM version at https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8&sr=0-2&qid=1442957668341 We have prepurchased reserved instances based on older PV machines (m1, c1, etc) It would be very very helpful to have a PV AMI so we could migrate to CentOS 7 on those image types.

The subject says it all. I got CentOS 6.4 installed and then converted it to boot into the Xen kernel, using the C6.4 system as its dom0. But now I'm uncertain how to put a C6.4 domU on the result. Which tools are recommended?

I have experienced this with a svn 1.5 client but not with 1.4.6. Did anybody see this with a 1.4.6 (or older) client? Btw. what is the server version? Anyway this seems to be a bug in subversion. Cheers, Gabor PS: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=79361 On Jul 1, 5:27 am, Chris Lattner <clatt... at apple.com> wrote: > Devang removed the old

Just for your information: after applying the cr-updates to a C6.5 my screens on my laptop renamed from VGA1 and eDP1 to VGA-0 and eDP-0. And since X insists that my VGA is left to my eDP (and my scripted xrandr was confused by the renaming) I had to go to the left to reach my right screen. I needed some more coffee this morning. Patrick