llvm dev - Dec 2012 - [LLVMdev] Heads up -- take two for renaming VMCore -> IR

Hello folks,

Now that the includes are sortable and I have another chunk of free time,
I'll be making another attempt at the mass renaming from VMCore to IR for
LLVM.

I'm also planning to move the header files currently in the top level for
LLVM down into the appropriate subdirectory. I'll create an IR directory
for the headers that really belong to that library component. However, I'm
going to look at each header, and if I can either lift it into Support, or
sink it all the way into Analysis or some other lower library, I will do
that. I'll move each header one at a time so that folks can chime in on the
review thread if there are questions / concerns about the layering here.

-Chandler
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121221/fcf85b6c/attachment.html>

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Now that the includes are sortable and I have another chunk of free time,
> I'll be making another attempt at the mass renaming from VMCore to IR
for
> LLVM.
Please make sure to update any documentation that references VMCore.

-- Sean Silva

Sounds great, thanks Chandler.  In addition to each file being discussed, it
would be nice to have a high level plan to kick things off.

-Chris

On Dec 21, 2012, at 10:24 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello folks,
> 
> Now that the includes are sortable and I have another chunk of free time,
I'll be making another attempt at the mass renaming from VMCore to IR for
LLVM.
> 
> I'm also planning to move the header files currently in the top level
for LLVM down into the appropriate subdirectory. I'll create an IR directory
for the headers that really belong to that library component. However, I'm
going to look at each header, and if I can either lift it into Support, or sink
it all the way into Analysis or some other lower library, I will do that.
I'll move each header one at a time so that folks can chime in on the review
thread if there are questions / concerns about the layering here.
> 
> -Chandler
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121223/96c28925/attachment.html>

On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
wrote:
> Sounds great, thanks Chandler.  In addition to each file being discussed,
> it would be nice to have a high level plan to kick things off.
>
What exact plan are you looking for?
>From the original thread:
- lib/VMCore -> lib/IR
- include/llvm/Foo.h -> include/llvm/IR/Foo.h (if Foo.h belongs in that
library)

I didn't have a more detailed plan. ;]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121222/a93a82f1/attachment.html>