Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Xen is affected by the trademark desease"
2006 Aug 30
3
pkg-xen team dead?
Hi folks
With the lack of responses to my restructuring the last weeks, it looks
like pkg-xen is dead.
Now, what to do? My favorite is to merge it into the kernel repository
where I have my infrastructure (archive and autobuilders for snapshots
for example) to properly work on it.
Bastian
--
No one wants war.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7
-------------- next part
2006 Oct 09
2
Bug#391935: Xen trademark might be problematic
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64
Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11561-1
Severity: serious
It seems Xen has a similar trademark policy as the much discussed
Mozilla one. Specifically http://www.xensource.com/xen-tm-faq.html
says:
| 16. If I distribute a changed version of the Xen? hypervisor, may I
| say that the changed product is the Xen hypervisor?
|
| No. If you have changed an
2004 Dec 03
1
CentOS-3 errata - updated httpd fixes trademark issue
A new version of httpd is available for CentOS-3 i386
This fixes a missed trademark issue in previous build.
https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710 refers.
Updated files are :-
updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.i386.rpm
updates/i386/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.src.rpm
yum update httpd will be
2007 Jan 01
1
Centos trademark issue
I found an old ROM BIOS chip in my drawer with label Centos(r) Copyright
1994 on it. Then I found http://www.centos.com.tw/ on the net.
Has anyone checked if you can use the name centos without any fear of
litigation?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070101/3918e0cc/attachment-0001.html>
2010 Jul 20
1
Registered / trademark signs
Colleagues,
What is the easiest means to embed a:
? (registered)
or
? (trademark)
sign in text in a graphic. I would like to use mtext and avoid plotmath, if possible. Ideally, the sign should be superscripted but I can easily sacrifice that.
Optimally, I need a solution that works in both OS X and Windows (? XP) and with R versions ? 2.11
Thanks in advance.
Dennis
Dennis Fisher MD
P <
2007 Aug 01
8
propossed 3.1 changes
Hi folks
I propose the following changes for 3.1:
- Rename source to xen-3. Upstream stripped one part of the version, so
the next should be 3.2.
- pygrub as extra package.
- Rename i386 to i386-nonpae
- Rename i386-pae to i386. PAE is upstream default now and pae images
works with a 64bit hypervisor.
We should think about supporting libvirt. It provides an AFAIK stable
interface on the
2001 Feb 16
6
ssh(R) trademark issues: comments and proposal
I'd like to address several issues raised by people in relation to my
notice of the ssh(R) trademark to the OpenSSH group. Also, I would
like to make a proposal to the community for resolving this issue
(included at the end).
First, I'll answer a number of questions and arguments presented in
the discussion.
> "the SSH Corp trademark registration in the US is for a logo
2004 Dec 18
3
httpd trademark issue -- here it is!
Hey,
A "powered by RedHat" gif recently appeared on the
bottom of the mirror monitor (mirmon) page:
http://www.advanced-app.com.hk/caosity/
This appeared in place of the "powered by CentOS" gif
that used to be there.
The mirmon page is getting it from the icons directory
under the default html directory.
An Apache update in November put the new gif there in
place of the
2005 Aug 19
5
Linux Trademarked?
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=25529
what's everyone's thoughts on this one?
--
My "Foundation" verse:
Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and
every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt
condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their
righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.
-- carpe ductum --
2001 Feb 14
1
More on TTSSH and the SSH trademark
I would also like to mention that when I released TTSSH in May 1998, I had
no concerns about violating any trademarks because I observed that the
name "SSH" was already being used by several different parties for
different purposes --- as the name of Ylonen's original SSH package and
its derivatives, as the name of the protocol, and as a component of names
of other implementations
2006 Jul 11
2
Trademark registration
Hi,
sorry if this is considered off-topic, however I suspect that this list
is full of people developing their own web apps who would appreciate
this kind of information, so:
I was wondering whether anybody would be willing to share his/her
experience with trademarking a web app''s name(/logo) in the US. What are
the alternatives, and what is the best/most affordable way to do it?
2001 Feb 14
10
SSH trademarks and the OpenSSH product name
Friends,
Sorry to write this to a developer mailing list. I have already
approached some OpenSSH/OpenBSD core members on this, including Markus
Friedl, Theo de Raadt, and Niels Provos, but they have chosen not to
bring the issue up on the mailing list. I am not aware of any other
forum where I would reach the OpenSSH developers, so I will post this
here.
As you know, I have been using the SSH
2008 Jan 01
1
guidelines for the use of the R logo
Hi,
I was wondering if there are any guidelines for the use of the R logo on websites which are for commercial use? Similar to http://www.python.org/community/logos/ for Python and to http://www.postgresql.org/community/propaganda for PostgreSQL perhaps?
thanks,
Jan
2001 Feb 15
0
The SSH trademark issue part #1
Hi,
I usually stay away from issues like this, basically because I'm not a
lawyer (and don't want to be one), and I don't have a real interest in
these issues.
Quoting Tatu :
> We also have a trademark pending on the Secure Shell mark
This seriously undermines the IETF standard draft. It's the same as
registering 'milk' as a trademark. Both Secure and Shell are
2001 Feb 14
0
OpenSSH Trademark Infringement
Just thought I'd put my two cents in about the trademark infringement
issue.
I ran the true SSH for about a month some time back. When I learned of
OpenSSH, I dropped the official product and built OpenSSH. Quite
frankly, OpenSSH is a superior package. It is cleaner, commercially
unencumbered, and with its affiliation to the OpenBSD team, I feel more
secure about the code quality.
When
2001 Feb 14
0
TTSSH and the SSH trademark
Hi everyone. I want to point out some facts about TTSSH that may be
relevant to the claims of trademark infringement by OpenSSH. I'll confine
my opinions to another message :-).
I released my product, which has always been named "Teraterm SSH" and is
usually abbreviated to "TTSSH", to the public in May 1998. TTSSH is a free
software Windows client for the SSH1 protocol.
2004 Oct 20
0
CentOS-3 errata - updated squirrelmail removes trademark issue
An updated squirrelmail has been released for CentOS-3 that removes a
trademark problem.
https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682
Updated file is :-
squirrelmail-1.4.3-0.e3.1.centos.1.noarch.rpm
in updates/i386/RPMS/
These are
2008 Jun 28
0
Bug#391935: updated trademark policy
There's an updated trademark policy available here:
http://xen.org/about/legal.html
It also includes an email address for questions.
I won't try to interpret the 8-page document myself.
Hope this helps,
Diego
2004 Dec 06
0
CentOS-3 x86_64 errata - updated httpd fixes trademark issue
A recent message announced new httpd packages that fixed a trademark
issue (refer to https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710) These
have now been made available for x86_64:
RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.x86_64.rpm
RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.x86_64.rpm
RPMS/mod_ssl-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.x86_64.rpm
SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.src.rpm
Execute "yum update
2009 Feb 03
2
Info related to the use of trademarks in documentation
There was an interesting note in a recent fedoraproject.org newsletter
regarding Redhat's legal views on referring to others' trademarks. Since
the comments are lengthy, they are not reproduced here and are available
at the links below.
FWN/Issue161: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue161#Legal
Callaway note: