similar to: Bug#645588: Shouldn't recreate alias on upgrades

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Bug#645588: Shouldn't recreate alias on upgrades"

2012 Feb 18
0
Bug#644583: Extra patch for smtpd_client_port_logging
Hey Still related to the use of smtpd_client_port_logging = yes in Postfix' main.cf, here's an extra patch for the "too many errors after" log message. Cheers, -- Lo?c Minier -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Allow-for-port-in-too-many-errors-Postfix-log.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 2110 bytes Desc: not available
2013 Mar 21
0
Processed (with 1 errors): Fix broken submitters (double encoded)
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > submitter 192827 Jos? Luis Gonz?lez <jlgonzal at ya.com> Bug #192827 [xdiskusage] xdiskusage: Printing doesn't manage non-ASCII characters Changed Bug submitter to 'Jos? Luis Gonz?lez <jlgonzal at ya.com>' from 'Jos?? Luis Gonz??lez <jlgonzal at ya.com>' > submitter 208308 R?diger Kuhlmann
2011 Mar 30
0
(fwd) Bug#618616: arm build failure with latest binutils - usr/klibc/syscalls/_exit.S:29: Error: .size expression does not evaluate to a constant
fwd'ing to klibc malinglist. ----- Forwarded message from Lo?c Minier <lool at dooz.org> ----- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:34:51 +0100 From: Lo?c Minier <lool at dooz.org> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org> Subject: Bug#618616: arm build failure with latest binutils - usr/klibc/syscalls/_exit.S:29: Error: .size expression does not evaluate to a
2012 Oct 23
0
Bug#691258: Missing / in RE for "reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size"
Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.15 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, Got this log from time to time in System Events: Oct 23 13:48:16 pig2 named[28880]: success resolving '26.0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa/PTR' (in '0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa'?) after reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets Changing the regexp for the "(in '...'?)"
2009 Apr 07
1
Bug#515156: Same bug after removal + reinstall
I ran into the same problem after somebody uninstalled logcheck and I re-installed it. It turned out that the ownership of /var/lock/logcheck where root:root - sudo chown logcheck:logcheck /var/lock/logcheck solved it. I see that there already is a check for the permissions in the postinst which (as far as I can see) *should* have fixed the permissions and ownership there. When re-installing
2004 Dec 25
2
Bug#287184: logcheck overwriting ownership/permissions of /etc/logcheck/* on upgrades
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.32 Severity: important In postinst logcheck "fixes" permissions of /etc/logcheck/* to 750. In my (and others on #d-d) opinion ownership and permissions should be preserved upon package upgrades. Logcheck must not screw with my decision to make them world readable every time it configures. -- Peter
2005 Jan 08
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/debian
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005, CVS User ttroxell wrote: > @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ > chown logcheck /var/lock/logcheck > /dev/null 2>&1 || true > fi > > + # fix for #284788 > + # update timestamp on cron > + touch /etc/cron.d/logcheck || true > + > ;; > > abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) on a box with a broken coreutils install
2012 Jan 27
1
Bug#657641: /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (31667) - No such process
Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.14 Severity: normal Tags: patch I keep getting these messages logged, when under high load. This patch should clean that up. commit 72661acccafa519fcb48a6a756e5c35d96e7511d Author: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn at axis.com> Date: Fri Jan 27 16:08:33 2012 +0100 Workaround for error: /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (31667)
2012 Mar 02
1
Bug#661912: logcheck: files with period in ignore rule dirs ignored
Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.14 Severity: normal I added a local.rules file to ignore.d.server and then ran logcheck. The file was not used during the run. Renaming it to local-rules got the file used during the next run. Fix: periods should be allowed in filenames, or the fact that they are forbidden expressly documented inteh logcheck README. Thanks Nils -- System Information: Debian
2009 Aug 18
2
Bug#542265: sendmail-base and logcheck-database: error when trying to install together
Package: logcheck-database,sendmail-base Version: logcheck-database/1.2.69 Version: sendmail-base/8.14.3-9 Severity: serious User: treinen at debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2009-08-18 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the
2011 Sep 08
0
Bug#611999: marked as done (amavisd-new: logcheck "Passed: CLEAN|SPAM" doesn't work because mail-id can contain "-")
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:48:50 +0000 with message-id <E1R1fuM-0008SF-9f at franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#639839: fixed in logcheck 1.3.14 has caused the Debian Bug report #639839, regarding amavisd-new: logcheck "Passed: CLEAN|SPAM" doesn't work because mail-id can contain "-" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem
2004 Jun 13
1
intermittent access this week
Hey team, I'll be at sea on and off this week, and as such my Internet access will depend on wifi availability while in port. 22a seems stable, but if any critical problems arise, feel free to prepare a release and bug Alfie to upload it. On the brighter side, I expect to be extremely bored while offline so I'll probably get some logcheck work done. <: Cheers, -- [ Todd J.
2011 Dec 18
0
Bug#652537: Please add rule for inetutils-syslogd
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.69 The inetutils-syslogd (2:1.5.dfsg.1-9) package provides a system logging daemon. syslogd periodically logs the following message: Dec 17 00:29:11 host syslogd (GNU inetutils 1.5): restart The following logcheck rulefile works to filter the messages from the "System Events" email: # cat inetutils-syslogd ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ syslogd
2004 Dec 20
3
Bug#286532: dnsmasq: misses message for DHCPINFORM due to 283331 fix
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.32 Severity: normal Tags: patch The fix for 283331 exposed a bug in the dnsmasq rules. The rule was looking for DHCPINFO, but the actual message is DHCPINFORM. Prior to the 283331 fix, the old rule worked, because the "[()[:alnum:]]+" part of the rule matched the "RM" at the end of DHCPINFORM. -- System Information: Debian Release:
2004 Jun 03
1
4 important bugs again <;
hello everyone, thanks to todd 1.2.21 is out :) every release getting better, i would like to get consensus on these "important" bugs: #252078 logtail: should depend on perl >= 5.8 sarge as any other modern linux distro use perl 5.8.x, it's even inside of its base. backports are under the peril of its author if no one voices up, i'll close that bug in the next days.
2004 Oct 21
3
Bug#277636: logcheck-database: support for dnsmasq
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.28 Severity: wishlist Could you add support for dnsmasq for the server profile? This is the standard dnsmasq output. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: read /etc/hosts - [[:digit:]]+ addresses$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: reading /etc/resolv.conf$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2004 May 28
2
Bug#251364: logcheck: preinst has bashism, fails with dash and LANG != C
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.20a Severity: serious Tags: patch On a system where sh points to dash and LANG=es_ES, I get this: # apt-get -y --reinstall install logcheck Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 23% Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de
2010 Dec 29
1
Bug#608256: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dnsmasq: dnsmasq: interface names are allowed to have a dash (-) please add this to the filter
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dnsmasq A dnsmasq log about DHCP events has the interface name in it. Interface names are allowed to have a dash (-) in them, but the logcheck filter does not have the dash in it. Please add the dash. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500,
2005 Aug 31
3
Bug#325801: logcheck: new regex to filter imap "Moved xxx bytes of new mail" messages
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.41 Severity: wishlist Hi folks, thanks for your work maintaining logcheck, it works well. When my users read their mail using imap (usually via squirrelmail, not sure about other clients) I get a message like this in the log: Aug 22 21:03:32 phoenix imapd[6551]: Moved 11323 bytes of new mail to /home/winky/mail/mbox from /var/spool/mail/winky host= localhost
2005 Feb 12
3
Bug#294950: logcheck: ignore.d.server courier imaplogin: DISCONNECTED not matching
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.34 Severity: normal the ignore.d.server pattern for courier 'imaplogin: DISCONNECTED' does not match the following line: Feb 12 16:19:47 backup imaplogin: DISCONNECTED, user=example at example.com, ip=[::ffff:111.111.111.111], headers=14013, body=0, time=1 This line should be ignored like the other DISCONNECTED messages. Or am I wrong? -- System