Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Bug#645588: Shouldn't recreate alias on upgrades"
2012 Feb 18
0
Bug#644583: Extra patch for smtpd_client_port_logging
Hey
Still related to the use of smtpd_client_port_logging = yes in Postfix'
main.cf, here's an extra patch for the "too many errors after" log
message.
Cheers,
--
Lo?c Minier
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Allow-for-port-in-too-many-errors-Postfix-log.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 2110 bytes
Desc: not available
2013 Mar 21
0
Processed (with 1 errors): Fix broken submitters (double encoded)
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> submitter 192827 Jos? Luis Gonz?lez <jlgonzal at ya.com>
Bug #192827 [xdiskusage] xdiskusage: Printing doesn't manage non-ASCII characters
Changed Bug submitter to 'Jos? Luis Gonz?lez <jlgonzal at ya.com>' from 'Jos?? Luis Gonz??lez <jlgonzal at ya.com>'
> submitter 208308 R?diger Kuhlmann
2011 Mar 30
0
(fwd) Bug#618616: arm build failure with latest binutils - usr/klibc/syscalls/_exit.S:29: Error: .size expression does not evaluate to a constant
fwd'ing to klibc malinglist.
----- Forwarded message from Lo?c Minier <lool at dooz.org> -----
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:34:51 +0100
From: Lo?c Minier <lool at dooz.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#618616: arm build failure with latest binutils -
usr/klibc/syscalls/_exit.S:29: Error: .size expression does not
evaluate to a
2012 Oct 23
0
Bug#691258: Missing / in RE for "reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size"
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.15
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
Got this log from time to time in System Events:
Oct 23 13:48:16 pig2 named[28880]: success resolving '26.0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa/PTR' (in '0/25.218.183.203.in-addr.arpa'?) after reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets
Changing the regexp for the "(in '...'?)"
2009 Apr 07
1
Bug#515156: Same bug after removal + reinstall
I ran into the same problem after somebody uninstalled logcheck and I
re-installed it.
It turned out that the ownership of /var/lock/logcheck where root:root -
sudo chown logcheck:logcheck /var/lock/logcheck solved it.
I see that there already is a check for the permissions in the postinst
which (as far as I can see) *should* have fixed the permissions and
ownership there.
When re-installing
2004 Dec 25
2
Bug#287184: logcheck overwriting ownership/permissions of /etc/logcheck/* on upgrades
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.32
Severity: important
In postinst logcheck "fixes" permissions of /etc/logcheck/* to 750.
In my (and others on #d-d) opinion ownership and permissions should be
preserved upon package upgrades. Logcheck must not screw with my
decision to make them world readable every time it configures.
--
Peter
2005 Jan 08
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/debian
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005, CVS User ttroxell wrote:
> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@
> chown logcheck /var/lock/logcheck > /dev/null 2>&1 || true
> fi
>
> + # fix for #284788
> + # update timestamp on cron
> + touch /etc/cron.d/logcheck || true
> +
> ;;
>
> abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
on a box with a broken coreutils install
2012 Jan 27
1
Bug#657641: /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (31667) - No such process
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.14
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
I keep getting these messages logged, when under high load.
This patch should clean that up.
commit 72661acccafa519fcb48a6a756e5c35d96e7511d
Author: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn at axis.com>
Date: Fri Jan 27 16:08:33 2012 +0100
Workaround for error:
/usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (31667)
2012 Mar 02
1
Bug#661912: logcheck: files with period in ignore rule dirs ignored
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.14
Severity: normal
I added a local.rules file to ignore.d.server and then ran logcheck. The file was not used during the run.
Renaming it to local-rules got the file used during the next run.
Fix: periods should be allowed in filenames, or the fact that they are forbidden expressly documented inteh logcheck README.
Thanks
Nils
-- System Information:
Debian
2009 Aug 18
2
Bug#542265: sendmail-base and logcheck-database: error when trying to install together
Package: logcheck-database,sendmail-base
Version: logcheck-database/1.2.69
Version: sendmail-base/8.14.3-9
Severity: serious
User: treinen at debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-08-18
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the
2011 Sep 08
0
Bug#611999: marked as done (amavisd-new: logcheck "Passed: CLEAN|SPAM" doesn't work because mail-id can contain "-")
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:48:50 +0000
with message-id <E1R1fuM-0008SF-9f at franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#639839: fixed in logcheck 1.3.14
has caused the Debian Bug report #639839,
regarding amavisd-new: logcheck "Passed: CLEAN|SPAM" doesn't work because mail-id can contain "-"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
2004 Jun 13
1
intermittent access this week
Hey team,
I'll be at sea on and off this week, and as such my Internet access will
depend on wifi availability while in port. 22a seems stable, but if any
critical problems arise, feel free to prepare a release and bug Alfie
to upload it.
On the brighter side, I expect to be extremely bored while offline so I'll
probably get some logcheck work done. <:
Cheers,
--
[ Todd J.
2011 Dec 18
0
Bug#652537: Please add rule for inetutils-syslogd
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.69
The inetutils-syslogd (2:1.5.dfsg.1-9) package provides a system
logging daemon. syslogd periodically logs the following message:
Dec 17 00:29:11 host syslogd (GNU inetutils 1.5): restart
The following logcheck rulefile works to filter the messages from the
"System Events" email:
# cat inetutils-syslogd
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ syslogd
2004 Dec 20
3
Bug#286532: dnsmasq: misses message for DHCPINFORM due to 283331 fix
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.32
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The fix for 283331 exposed a bug in the dnsmasq rules. The rule was
looking for DHCPINFO, but the actual message is DHCPINFORM. Prior to
the 283331 fix, the old rule worked, because the "[()[:alnum:]]+" part
of the rule matched the "RM" at the end of DHCPINFORM.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
2004 Jun 03
1
4 important bugs again <;
hello everyone,
thanks to todd 1.2.21 is out :)
every release getting better, i would like to get
consensus on these "important" bugs:
#252078 logtail: should depend on perl >= 5.8
sarge as any other modern linux distro use perl 5.8.x,
it's even inside of its base.
backports are under the peril of its author
if no one voices up, i'll close that bug in the next days.
2004 Oct 21
3
Bug#277636: logcheck-database: support for dnsmasq
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.28
Severity: wishlist
Could you add support for dnsmasq for the server profile?
This is the standard dnsmasq output.
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: read /etc/hosts - [[:digit:]]+ addresses$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: reading /etc/resolv.conf$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2004 May 28
2
Bug#251364: logcheck: preinst has bashism, fails with dash and LANG != C
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.20a
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
On a system where sh points to dash and LANG=es_ES, I get this:
# apt-get -y --reinstall install logcheck
Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0%
Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0%
Leyendo lista de paquetes... 23%
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0%
Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0%
Creando ?rbol de
2010 Dec 29
1
Bug#608256: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dnsmasq: dnsmasq: interface names are allowed to have a dash (-) please add this to the filter
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.69
Severity: normal
File: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dnsmasq
A dnsmasq log about DHCP events has the interface name in it. Interface names are allowed to have a dash (-) in them,
but the logcheck filter does not have the dash in it.
Please add the dash.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.7
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500,
2005 Aug 31
3
Bug#325801: logcheck: new regex to filter imap "Moved xxx bytes of new mail" messages
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.41
Severity: wishlist
Hi folks, thanks for your work maintaining logcheck, it works well.
When my users read their mail using imap (usually via squirrelmail,
not sure about other clients) I get a message like this in the log:
Aug 22 21:03:32 phoenix imapd[6551]: Moved 11323 bytes of new mail to /home/winky/mail/mbox from /var/spool/mail/winky host= localhost
2011 Jul 02
1
Bug#632471: logcheck-database: spamd child cleanup message broken after upgrade to squeeze
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.3.13
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
After upgrading to debian squeeze I get several messages a day in the form of:
Jul 2 15:05:15 hostname spamd[21286]: spamd: handled cleanup of child pid [28609] due to SIGCHLD: exit 0
This is due to an update in spamd, that makes the message more detailed (includes exit code)[1]. Therefore messages including exit code 0