similar to: Bug#448510: logcheck-database: revised pattern for spamd

On 17/09/2020 11:20, Roman Vasilyev wrote: > Sorry for offtopic, don't know where to ask it > after updating from `ubuntu` 18 to 20 > started getting this on running golang binary from sieve rules file > ``` > Sep 17 08:54:00 lonjemail spamd[3231]: spamd: connection from ::1 > [::1]:57844 to port 783, fd 5 > Sep 17 08:54:00 lonjemail spamd[3231]: spamd: setuid to

Sorry for offtopic, don't know where to ask it after updating from `ubuntu` 18 to 20 started getting this on running golang binary from sieve rules file ``` Sep 17 08:54:00 lonjemail spamd[3231]: spamd: connection from ::1 [::1]:57844 to port 783, fd 5 Sep 17 08:54:00 lonjemail spamd[3231]: spamd: setuid to Debian-exim succeeded Sep 17 08:54:00 lonjemail spamd[3231]: spamd: processing message

I've been messing with this for too long, now, and I'm blind to whatever's wrong. Or I'm simply being dense. Either way, I need help with a common issue. I'm trying to get Postfix+Spamassassin+Dovecot going on Fedora 10. (I'll get back to the global Sieve thingy soon, but I need to get this going, first.) When using the simple: mailbox_command =

Hi all, This is the first time I use the dovecot mail list so I?m sorry if I forget something. My problem is that for some reason I can get public mailboxes to work. I have setup the directory Public, the folders and the cur,tmp and new folder in them: Public | |- .office3 | |- cur |- tmp |- new |- dovecot-acl Here is my dovecot conf: # 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS:

# Commit a3169ad6defc5ea28992a786387e345cb91c14a3 tag 448510 pending thanks In article <20071029165738.32481.50847.reportbug__39564.2398893417$1193677404$gmane$org at corn.betterworld.us> you wrote: > spamassassin is now reporting Unix domain sockets in the rport field. I take it you are using --socketpath in /etc/default/spamassassin? > I'm not exactly sure what changed to

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.27 # # logcheck (1.2.64) unstable; urgency=low # # * ignore.d.server/dhcp # - Adding dhcp rules for DNS updates by ddns_remove_a() # (closes: #459875, #472368) # - Added dhcp "removed reverse map" rule, which occurs on DHCPRELEASE. # * ignore.d.server/spamd # - deal with socket connections by e.g. evolution

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.43a Severity: minor Since last weekend's upgrade of logcheck-database from 1.2.42 to 1.2.43a, logcheck stopped ignoring routine SpamAssassin messages of the form Feb 20 21:36:16 tux64 spamd[4665]: spamd: checking message <20060220190721.0E0B41C5207 at llwb563.servidoresdns.net> for amu:7286 Could you please edit the second pattern in

Hello fellow CentOS-users, on the net there are lots of Spamassassin related HOWTOs - describing how to create a shell script for Postfix and how to install Spamassassin and start its spamd daemon - step by step. Additionally antivirus setups are described... But I have a strong feeling, that this is unneeded on CentOS 6 - because there are already preconfigured stock packages for postfix and

Your message dated Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:32:06 +0000 with message-id <E1KZsec-00064d-FQ at ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#474239: fixed in logcheck 1.3.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #474239, regarding spamassassin: spamd logcheck file doesn't work with shortcircuit enabled to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.47 The file /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/spamd contains a line ending in SIGCHHLD$, which is an "H" to much. Regards, Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal Tags: patch After upgrading to debian squeeze I get several messages a day in the form of: Jul 2 15:05:15 hostname spamd[21286]: spamd: handled cleanup of child pid [28609] due to SIGCHLD: exit 0 This is due to an update in spamd, that makes the message more detailed (includes exit code)[1]. Therefore messages including exit code 0

I've seen the following appear in some tests with Asterisk 11.11: WARNING[3938][C-00000003]: chan_sip.c:10535 process_sdp: Rejecting secure audio stream without encryption details: audio 54908 UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF 109 0 8 101 Specifically, it always happens from a Firefox 24 host but it works without this error from another host running Firefox 26 I did a diff on the SDP and couldn't see

Hello all, Let me try this again with some code. I am trying to make a new object and it's not working. I get : Error in rematchDefinition(definition, fdef, mnames, fnames, signature) : methods can add arguments to the generic only if '...' is an argument to the generic as my error. I have included my code. It is from the xcms package. Any help would be great even if

I have installed spamassassin, per the instructions on Scalix's wiki, and it is working, with some important caviats. So I asked for help on the spamassassin user list, and got some, but I think I am butting up against some Centos specific issues... This is what I am seeing in the maillog: Aug 17 14:39:59 z9m9z sendmail[13082]: l7HIdvGf013082: Milter add: header: X-Spam-Checker-Version:

Hi All. I'm running some tests with the latest Asterisk SVN-branch-12-r410493M compiled with fresh github pjsip and srtp 1.4.2 on an i386 centOS machine (2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.i686). As a client I'm using the sipMLP WebRTC javascript softphone running on Chrome 33.0.1750.146 m. I have the softphone correctly registered on the Asterisk machine but as soon as I try to start a new call

I am using Asterisk 11.3.0 and just updated Nightly to 24.0a1 (2013-06017) and get a SIP 488 Not Acceptable Here response. I have no problems using the same Asterisk configuration and the same page to make a call from Chrome. I have seen other people post a similar issue, but I have not seen a solution. If someone with good knowledge of this issue were to respond with "this is a known

hi, is there someone with working asterisk13+chan_sip+SIP.js/sipml5 ? or is chan_pjsip better supported? or the recommended way for asterisk is use respoke.io? my problem with asterisk13+chan_sip+sipml5(the same problem is with SIP.js) chan_sip.c:10496 process_sdp: Can't provide secure audio requested in SDP offer " sip.conf (important parts) [vr1a882] ... nat=force_rport,comedia

heads up and fyi folks... CentOS 4 latest... SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 running on Perl version 5.8.8 :-) i noticed on a centos 4 box after doing a manual yum update and getting 2 updated perl packages from rpmforge again, just a heads up as rpmforge has been rock solid for us for years so we are no bashing spamassassin would not restart after the updates.... spamd: Oct 27 22:32:01.340

Hello, I was testing with sdp and something came up worth asking: While calling from a webrtc client to another (chrome, sip.js) Asterisk receives the following sdp and rejects it with 488 Not Acceptable. Why does this happen, what's wrong with the sdp? The second sdp body below is accepted instead. Both have rtp profile RTP/SAVPF, difference is that the second one was produced by rtpengine,

Trying to set up a mail server under CentOS7 - having done this with CentOS5 and CentOS6 over the last decade with no issues and reliable service, it was time to upgrade (?) to CentOS7. Shouldn't be a problem, right? Getting to grips with systemd has been challenging - to say the least. So a brief overview of what I am trying to set up: postfix / amavisd-new / spamassassin / clamav so we