Logcheck devel - Mar 2008 - Bug#448510: logcheck-database: revised pattern for spamd

# Commit a3169ad6defc5ea28992a786387e345cb91c14a3
tag 448510 pending
thanks

In article
<20071029165738.32481.50847.reportbug__39564.2398893417$1193677404$gmane$org
at corn.betterworld.us> you wrote:
> spamassassin is now reporting Unix domain sockets in the rport field.
I take it you are using --socketpath in /etc/default/spamassassin?
> I'm not exactly sure what changed to cause this to happen; it started
>From what I can glean from upstream's SVN, this has been the case for at
least three years.  I could be wrong, though.
> and differs only in the pattern for rport, with [0-9]+ becoming [^,]+.
I opted for [/[:alnum:]]+, as it was already used for the corresponding
"got connection over" rule.

Thanks!


-- 
< jaybonci> actually d-i stands for "divine intervention" ;)
		-- in #debian-devel

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> # Commit a3169ad6defc5ea28992a786387e345cb91c14a3
> tag 448510 pending
Bug#448510: logcheck-database: revised pattern for spamd
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 20:06 -0400, Fr?d?ric Bri?re
wrote:
> # Commit a3169ad6defc5ea28992a786387e345cb91c14a3
> tag 448510 pending
> thanks
> 
> In article
<20071029165738.32481.50847.reportbug__39564.2398893417$1193677404$gmane$org
at corn.betterworld.us> you wrote:
> > spamassassin is now reporting Unix domain sockets in the rport field.
> 
> I take it you are using --socketpath in /etc/default/spamassassin?
Yes.
> 
> > I'm not exactly sure what changed to cause this to happen; it
started
> 
> >From what I can glean from upstream's SVN, this has been the case
for at
> least three years.  I could be wrong, though.
> 
> > and differs only in the pattern for rport, with [0-9]+ becoming [^,]+.
> 
> I opted for [/[:alnum:]]+, as it was already used for the corresponding
> "got connection over" rule.
> 
> Thanks!
Thank you.
Ross