similar to: Bug#408557: logcheck-database: little fix for a cracklib rule

I'm testing Samba 3.0.3pre2 and am particularly interested in the new --with-cracklib support. I see the configuration directive to enable cracklib functionality in the changelog, but am curious if anyone has any additional documentation. The man pages, etc... appear not to be updated yet. Is there any mechanism for 'tweaking' the password strenth rules, as there is with

Hello, I would like to enforce some level of password complexity when users change their password. I have a Samba PDC running on Debian set to sync Unix passwords. I'm trying to get Samba to work with cracklib, but it isn't going well. Here is what I've tried: Installed libpam-cracklib, compiled examples/auth/crackcheck and copied the binary to /usr/local/sbin. I added the

Hallo, we run a Redhat samba 3.5.4 PDC with openldap 2.4 as user/passwordbackend. The ldap also contains the posix information for the users to login to some web/mail/etc. servers. I'm faced with the task to implement a 'both worlds' compatible paswword sync process regarding complexity etc. For the posix account password we use a webfrontend, configure to use pam/cracklib checks

Hi! I've wrote to you on previous occasion but surprisingly nobody seems to have this problem, I don't know if it can be an error mine in the configuration files or if it's a problem in the Samba with cracklib, well I've installed samba 3.0.4 and put in the file /etc/pam.d/samba an entry to the cracklib library but smbd seems to do nothing with this line, I've devel

Hi there, Here are the facts: - I have samba 3.4.2-0.42.fc11 running on a Fedora 11 system. - Samba is acting as a domain controller, no Windows server involved. - I am using tdbsam. - I need to enforce certain password requirements. The password requirements are: - min 8 characters - expiration 90 days - last 10 passwords may not be reused - not a dictionary word Per the Samba 3.2 FAQ, the

Hi Samba folks, I had a couple questions about password complexity checking. To preface, in smb.conf, we set: check password script = /usr/local/sbin/crackcheck -d /usr/share/cracklib/pw_dict Also, if I understand correctly: /usr/local/sbin/crackcheck comes from samba source rpm package. maybe we need to compile it ourselves. /usr/share/cracklib/pw_dict* comes from cracklib-dicts rpm

Hi! before nothing, sorry for my english, I hope you understand me. I've a problem with the new samba 3.0.4-1.12, before I had the version 3.0.2a with LDAP for administrate all the users and when a samba password expired I used the "use cracklib" parameter for force the user to insert a strong password, well now this parameter isn't avaliable and I believe that must make it

I also sorted the list. Between libguestfs 1.28 and 1.30, the appliance grew from 95MB to 213MB. Using guestmount and filelight (see link below) I could see that the main contributor was these two directories, which should not be necessary. With this change, the size goes down to 119MB. See also: https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2015/07/23/why-has-the-libguestfs-appliance-grown-by-118-mb/ ---

I would like to bump my question 2015-05-27 10:21 GMT+03:00 Krutskikh Ivan <stein.hak at gmail.com>: > Hmm, looks like it's not. I've just set the password for something that > cracklib-check would argue using both ad management tools and at windows > login. Should it work that way or I'm missing something? > > My dc's smb.conf: > > [global] >

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.68 Severity: normal Hi, I use postfix, amavisd-new and logcheck on a lenny server, and the mails I receive seem a little to verbose. For example, I get in the report all mails which are received, for example: Sep 11 08:35:11 heracles amavis[19788]: (19788-02) Passed CLEAN, [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] <user at domain> -> <user at

Hi all, can someone give a working example for checking the password complexity in samba? I have tried the next one 1. Download and extract samba-3.4.15.tar.zg. Go to samba-3.4.15/examples/auth/crackcheck and compile crackcheck 2. Copy crackcheck binary to the /usr/bin/ 3. Check that the program working correctly # /usr/bin/crackcheck -d /usr/share/cracklib/pw_dict 123 ERR - it is too short #

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.8 Severity: wishlist HI, can you please create a rule/some rules for amavis(d-new). I get for every mail this mesage: May 25 19:55:40 data amavis[9603]: (09603-15) Passed CLEAN, [::1] [213.165.64.22] <xxx at yyy.zz> -> \ <aaa at localhost>, Message-ID: <20100525175015.29677page1 at mx002.bbb.ccc>, mail_id: MM7upJv6se1Z, \ Hits:

Hi ! I'still running a samba domain controller on a rhel 5 machine, so it is version samba-3.0.33-3.7.el5. Users and accounts are still stored in a ldap database and everything works fine. Now that my setup is complete, I'd like to - force every user of the domain to change their password the next time they open a session on their workstation - be sure that the password is complex

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.20a Severity: serious Tags: patch On a system where sh points to dash and LANG=es_ES, I get this: # apt-get -y --reinstall install logcheck Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 23% Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de

This seems to be common thread on the list, but I'm pulling my hair out and have to ask.. I've been following a couple of guides and using AD to authenticate users on my linux system. These include the ubuntu guide -- https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ActiveDirectoryWinbindHowto - https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member -

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, I think that this rule: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ su\[[0-9]+\]: (\+|-) (pts/[0-9]{1,2}|tty[0-9]) [_[:alnum:]-]+:[_[:alnum:]-]+$ is supposed to filter out lines like: Oct 17 14:49:24 myhost su[13469]: + /dev/pts/1 user1:root It is not working because the pattern dos not include the "/dev/" part and

Rowland Penny schrieb am 28.03.2015 00:15: > I installed jessie in a vm to test it, seeing as how sernet hasn't got > round to releasing 4.2 packages yet and then Peter posted that he had > got 4.2 running on jessie. I would love to know how he did this ? Oh. I am a pretty newbie on this field. Maybe that helped... First I install the basic system including LXDE. On the problem

Hi all, If I try yum grouplist "FTP Server" I get the next large output: Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: OpenIPMI x86_64

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Commit 037fed5fc268088bad1f17c885d9153ee800ec40 > tag 444470 pending Bug#444470: /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-ssh: Updated "authentication failure" rule There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

In article <20080120021013.GA2871__36835.8155632906$1200797204$gmane$org at nexus.elho.net> you wrote: > Looking at those two lines, they could just be different versions of > the same thing, here are the commented differences: Take my word: you'll live longer if you don't try to make sense of ssh log messages. (I *swear* I once got different messages by doing the same thing