similar to: Bug#407642: another update

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Bug#407642: another update"

2006 Dec 13
1
Postfix + Doveot SASL
Hi, i'm trying to configure my postfix to use dovecot SASL instead of saslauthd with rimap to authenticate my users. I've modified my postfix/dovecot configuration as is described on http://wiki.dovecot.org/PostfixAndDovecotSASL but when an user try to login it fails with the following log (debug_auth = on): Dec 12 15:07:53 lorien dovecot: auth(default): client in:
2007 Jan 21
0
Bug#407777: postfix message not chatched by rules
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.53 Severity: minor On my mailserver i've got some message like the following (user infos obscured): Jan 21 08:01:01 lorien postfix/smtp[3005]: 39D2315533A: to=<someuser at somedomain.org>, relay=mail.somedomain.org[11.22.33.44]:25, conn_use=2, delay=1.3, delays=0.06/0/0.44/0.83, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Message queued) This is a normal
2007 Jan 20
0
Bug#407642: dovecot rules don't ignore local logins
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.53 Severity: normal Tags: patch Accordingly with dovecot source src/login-common/client-common.c arround line 52 dovecot reports local connections with word "secured" at the same place where it insert the word TLS for encrypted connections. On my dovecot + squirrelmail system all connections are originating from local ip, so all message are
2009 Dec 16
2
Build fix on HURD
I've made two little patches to allow dovecot to be compiled on GNU/Hurd. Could you review them? Kind regards, Marco Nenciarini -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Marco Nenciarini | Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member | | mnencia at prato.linux.it | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia |
2009 Nov 27
1
FTBFS with binutils-gold
As reported in debian bug #554306 [1] dovecot fails to build with GNU binutils-gold or setting LDFLAGS=-Wl,--no-add-needed http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554306 The problem is that liblber isn't explicitly declared as a dependence when dovecot is compiled with ldap support. The attached patch fixes this little error. Regards, Marco --
2010 Feb 21
0
Bug#570764: dovecot-common: sieve should allow Return-path header for address test
package dovecot-common forward 570764 dovecot at dovecot.org thanks Martin Schwenke ha scritto: > Package: dovecot-common > Version: 1:1.2.10-1 > Severity: normal > > > I attempt to compile the following sieve script... > > martins at bilbo:~/tmp$ cat test.sieve > if address :is "Return-path" "owner-cipe-l at inka.de" { > keep; > } >
2006 Oct 13
1
Segfault in in rc7 when index does not exists
This is the trace (gdb) run Starting program: /root/tmp/dovecot-1.0.rc7/src/imap/imap x select inbox Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. mail_index_write_base_header (index=0x80e2a28, hdr=0xaff66028) at mail-index.c:1313 1313 memcpy(index->map->mmap_base, hdr, hdr_size); (gdb) bt #0 mail_index_write_base_header (index=0x80e2a28, hdr=0xaff66028) at
2009 Nov 22
6
Strange interaction from grub2 and XEN
I''m testing how xen and grub2 can work together. I''m using xen 3.4.2 and grub2 1.97+20091115-1 from debian sid. After many failed attempts I''ve discovered that on my system the first argument that grub2 should pass to the linux kernel is lost. This is my working grub2 configuration: menuentry "Xen 3.4.0 / Debian GNU/Linux, Linux 2.6.31-1-xen-amd64" {
2009 Nov 22
6
Strange interaction from grub2 and XEN
I''m testing how xen and grub2 can work together. I''m using xen 3.4.2 and grub2 1.97+20091115-1 from debian sid. After many failed attempts I''ve discovered that on my system the first argument that grub2 should pass to the linux kernel is lost. This is my working grub2 configuration: menuentry "Xen 3.4.0 / Debian GNU/Linux, Linux 2.6.31-1-xen-amd64" {
2009 Oct 27
2
oldschool xen kernel on sid
Hello! In an attempt to finally get a recent Xen dom0 kernel booted on this pesky amd64 system (see <http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2009-10/msg00485.html> for the (short) story), I wanted to give this one one a try: Marco Nenciarini <mnencia at prato.linux.it> wrote: > I've applied latest forward ported patches from > >
2004 Jul 15
5
Bug#259603: logcheck-database: postfix/lmtp rules do not match some configurations
package: logcheck-database version: 1.2.23 severity: wishlist The current regexp's for postfix/lmtp.. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/lmtp\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9A-F]: to=<[^[:space:]]+>, orig_to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[^[:space:]]+\], delay=[0-9]+ status=sent \(250 2\.1\.5 Ok\)$ ..doesn't catch these messages: Jul 15 17:15:16 lorien postfix/lmtp[17151]: C1170480008B:
2004 Mar 02
0
Roaming profiles problems Samba 3.0.2a / Win XP Pro/Win2K
Hi guys, I'm experiencing seemingly random problems using roaming profiles with Samba 3.0.2 on Debian Woody and clients being Win XP Pro and Win2K (all of them running the latest service packs and critical updates and so forth). Sometimes when one of the machines tires to login the server profile can't be found. The error Windows comes up with is "Network name cannot be found."
1997 Aug 20
0
Max Mux.
Could anyone tell me what max mux is, and where to change it on a pc?? Thanks, please respond directly as I am not on the list. ------------------------------------- Michael A. Ballbach: N0ZTQ, yeh-zehn. ballbach@lorien.ml.org <--- PGP Key Here. (finger) mikeb@vr1.com http://ballbach.lorien.ml.org/ "I don't know how world war three will be fought, but world war four will
1997 Jul 28
1
Win95 browse trouble, other user logins
I've seen this problem mentioned before on the list, but I've never seen an answer.... I'm running samba on a pc running linux 2.0.30, 32 meg ram. (pentium 133) I start smbd out of inetd.conf: netbios-ns dgram udp wait root /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd nmbd netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -l/var/adm/smblogs/log -s/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf
2019 Sep 05
4
Questions about 2n dc and samba update
Hi, I have to upgrade 2 different samba AD DC (2 domains) from 4.4.5 to 4.10.7 First is a single server and updaded with in-place upgrade from 4.4.5 to 4.10.7 and all perfect Second environment I need to add a second dc and also upgrade existing server, and I have some question about how to do this: - join second domain server with 4.10.7 - then make in place upgrade on existing server dc1?
2019 Sep 05
1
Questions about 2n dc and samba update
Thanks Rowland!!! Missatge de Trenta sis <trenta.sis at gmail.com> del dia dj., 5 de set. 2019 a les 11:52: > > Hi, > > Thanks for your information about DNS config. > About second server and update, I understand that First I have to > transfer role to new added, demote old, and then rejoin and transfer > fsmo roles to source server, right? > My question is related
2008 Feb 18
2
mail server management
Hi, this is sort of off topic but I'm using dovecot with postfix on centos 5 and I have multiple virtual domains and I want to be able to have virtual admin's add/remove mappings/users for their own domains. I have looked around and haven't found many solutions just wondering what everyone is using for virtual mail management. TIA, Paul
2010 Jan 20
2
md5_verify(...): Not a valid MD5-CRYPT or PLAIN-MD5 password
'afternoon list! I use mysql as userdb, which contains two type of password schemes: DES and MD5-CRYPT. I read there : http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/PasswordSchemes that both are supported by dovecot. Unfortunately, dovecot keeps saying: Not a valid MD5-CRYPT or PLAIN-MD5 password when looking for a user with DES encrypted password. Is dovecot able to recognize password
2010 Mar 22
1
Debian Unstable Packages
Hi all, Speaking of Debian, what relative position are the Debian Unstable (Sid) packages in to the latest "Bleeding edge" builds of RCS-based releases from the Wiki? If using Unstable is it recommended to stay or use the newer ones? I'd say it was production, yes, but I'm forgiving of problems in the latest releases, so long as they aren't meant to be beta (i.e., known
2019 Sep 05
0
Questions about 2n dc and samba update
Hi, Thanks for your information about DNS config. About second server and update, I understand that First I have to transfer role to new added, demote old, and then rejoin and transfer fsmo roles to source server, right? My question is related with demote and transfer FSMO roles, this task are stable and works correct? I'm not clear to demote main server, now with 4.4.5 because no rolback