similar to: Processed: Re: Bug#352043: dovecot-imapd: logcheck rules miss some lines

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Processed: Re: Bug#352043: dovecot-imapd: logcheck rules miss some lines"

2006 Feb 11
1
Bug#352337: please tighten permissions on /etc/logcheck
Package: logcheck Severity: wishlist I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers stable APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686)
2005 Jul 28
2
Bug#320274: logcheck-database: Please add pop3 to dovecot
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.40 Severity: wishlist Hi, Please duplicate the imap-login related lines and change them to filter out the equivalent messages emitted by pop3-login. regards Andrew -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel:
2006 Mar 29
2
Bug#359878: logcheck: extend exim rules to cope with multiple recipients
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.43a Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 Versions of packages logcheck depends on: ii adduser 3.77 Add and remove
2006 Feb 06
1
Bug#351669: logcheck: [manual] the sudo(1) is missing from EXAMPLES
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.35 Severity: minor Current manual reads: EXAMPLES logcheck can be invoked directly thanks to su(8) or sudo(8), which change the user ID: logcheck -o -t Check the logfiles without updating the offset. Print everything to STDOUT I believe this shuold be formatted as: EXAMPLES logcheck can be invoked directly thanks
2006 Jan 03
1
Bug#344832: (fwd) Re: Bug#344832: correct subject header
----- Forwarded message from General Stone <generalstone at gmx.net> ----- X-Original-To: maks at sternwelten.at Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:59:03 +0100 From: General Stone <generalstone at gmx.net> To: maximilian attems <maks at sternwelten.at> Subject: Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344832: correct subject header On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:09:48PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: >
2006 Feb 21
2
Bug#353868: logcheck-database: no longer ignores "spamd: checking message ..."
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.43a Severity: minor Since last weekend's upgrade of logcheck-database from 1.2.42 to 1.2.43a, logcheck stopped ignoring routine SpamAssassin messages of the form Feb 20 21:36:16 tux64 spamd[4665]: spamd: checking message <20060220190721.0E0B41C5207 at llwb563.servidoresdns.net> for amu:7286 Could you please edit the second pattern in
2006 Feb 21
2
Bug#353815: logcheck: Ignore Pocket PC/synce/USB messages, please
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.42 Severity: wishlist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Here are some more messages that can be safely ignored: localhost kernel: drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial Driver core localhost kernel: drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial support registered for PocketPC PDA localhost kernel: drivers/usb/serial/ipaq.c: USB PocketPC PDA driver
2006 Feb 22
2
Bug#353962: integrate courier file in logcheck-database
Package: courier-imap-ssl,logcheck-database Severity: wishlist Please move /etc/logcheck/*/courier to the courier packages and out of logcheck-database. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers stable APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked
2006 Jan 07
2
Bug#346350: logcheck-database: dhcp3-server ignores need to include (none ) client host name
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: normal I use dhcp3-server and a dhcp client which is Sony HDD video recorder CoCoon. The client not return client host name. In this case, dhcpd server assumed the client host name is (none). Therefor dhcpd output log described below. > Jan 7 10:49:24 on-o dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 08:00:46:33:55:77 ((none)) via eth0 > Jan 7 10:49:25
2005 Jun 03
2
[ttroxell@debian.org: Re: Logcheck rules from other packages]
I'm not sure if this message ever made it to you, Jamie. I had a reverse DNS problem shortly after it was sent. ----- Forwarded message from Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org> ----- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:22:18 -0400 From: Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org> To: "Jamie L. Penman-Smithson" <jamie at silverdream.org> Subject: Re: Logcheck rules from other
2005 Apr 29
3
Bug#303661: logcheck: More openntpd improvements
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.39 Followup-For: Bug #303661 Attached is another entry that suppresses the adjustment messages -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7-grsec Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages logcheck depends on: ii
2005 May 19
3
Bug#309772: please add ignore lines for autossh
Package: logcheck-database Severity: wishlist Hi! if autossh debug is enabled it logs to syslog, thus the messages go thru logcheck, messages are in this form May 19 14:02:55 sagara autossh[1909]: port set to 0, monitoring disabled so this is the ignore line ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ autossh\[[0-9]+\]: .*$ thanks, filippo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment
2005 Mar 22
3
Bug#300888: logcheck-database: database skip postgrey ignore pattern
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.35 Severity: minor logcheck-database contain postgrey ignore file, but postgrey first attempt is listed in logcheck report $ dpkg -l postgrey ii postgrey 1.18-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-C3EZRA Locale: LANG=it_IT,
2006 Feb 12
1
Bug#338732: logcheck-database: ignore rule for package cvs
tags 338732 pending thanks On 12 Nov 2005, at 11:38, Martin Lohmeier wrote: > here is a rule for the cvs package. The line that should be ignored > looks like this: > > Nov 12 12:02:22 djinn01 cvs-pserver[15917]: connect from > 212.202.200.77 (212.202.200.77) > Nov 12 12:31:00 djinn01 cvs-pserver[18386]: connect from > 80.190.250.190 (80.190.250.190) > > I'll
2005 May 15
1
Bug#191637: New rules for qpopper
package logcheck-database tags 125794 pending tags 191637 pending thanks I've been running the latest version of qpopper from unstable for a few days and I've added the following rules to CVS: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ in.qpopper\[[0-9]+\]: connect from [._[:alnum:]-]+$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ in.qpopper\[[0-9]+\]: \(v[.[:digit:]]+\) POP login by user
2005 Apr 28
1
Bug#306695: nagios: logcheck lines, please
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 22:10 -0400, Steve Gran wrote: > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ nagios: EXTERNAL COMMAND: PROCESS_SERVICE_CHECK_RESULT > > (although that may be too broad) Can you provide the log messages that this matches? Thanks, -- -jamie <jamie at silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam at silverdream.org w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms at silverdream.org pgp
2004 Jul 15
5
Bug#259603: logcheck-database: postfix/lmtp rules do not match some configurations
package: logcheck-database version: 1.2.23 severity: wishlist The current regexp's for postfix/lmtp.. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/lmtp\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9A-F]: to=<[^[:space:]]+>, orig_to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[^[:space:]]+\], delay=[0-9]+ status=sent \(250 2\.1\.5 Ok\)$ ..doesn't catch these messages: Jul 15 17:15:16 lorien postfix/lmtp[17151]: C1170480008B:
2005 May 03
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/docs
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 07:20 +0000, CVS User maks-guest wrote: > Modified Files: > logcheck.sgml > Log Message: > > minor addition describe 3 layers. > remove the url tag not recognized by docbook2man. > + > + <para>The reported messages are sorted in three different layers. > + The system events verbosity is governed by aboves level choice. > + The
2005 Feb 20
1
Rename violations.ignore.d/logcheck-pureftp
<nitpickyness> To avoid possible confusion, shouldn't this be named logcheck-pureftpd, or logcheck-pure-ftpd (instead of logcheck-pureftp)? Or is there a reason (that I've missed) it's this way? </nitpickyness> -j -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This
2005 Sep 15
2
Bug#328632: Please include README.logcheck-database.gz
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.41 Severity: minor man (8) logcheck says: For hints on how to maintain rules, see README.logcheck-database.gz, but this file is not included in /usr/share/doc/logcheck. micah -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: