similar to: Bug#346502: new output from su (login)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Bug#346502: new output from su (login)"

2004 Jul 11
2
Bug#254681: logcheck-database: su from cron job not necessarily to "nobody"
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.23 Followup-For: Bug #254681 Please generalize "nobody" to "[_[:alnum:]-]+", as some cron jobs su to other users: Jul 11 06:51:16 tux su[10385]: + ??? root:hinfo Jul 11 06:57:25 tux su[29801]: + ??? root:www-data Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500,
2009 Feb 23
1
Bug#463793: rsyslogd restarts are not ignored
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:15:24 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > logcheck has the policy not to ignore restart messages. Thanks for > the patch, please understand that I won't be including it. Quote from README.logcheck-database: "Unfortunately, we don't have the time to add and update rules for everything, therefore the following exceptions apply: * Debug messages * Messages
2011 Feb 28
1
Logwatch reporting spamassassin messages as unmatched entries
I've recently switched to using spamassassin via a sendmail milter, rather than using procmail to invoke it. This means that I get a number of messages appearing in my maillog, and then being reported by logwatch as unmatched entries. An example of such a messages is: Feb 27 04:33:09 quail sendmail[24780]: p1R4X46P024780[2]: URIBL blacklist\n\t* [URIs: tablettoxicspillsrx.ru]\n\t* 1.5
2009 Oct 17
1
Bug#551340: [logcheck-database] Rule in /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-su does not match
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, I think that this rule: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ su\[[0-9]+\]: (\+|-) (pts/[0-9]{1,2}|tty[0-9]) [_[:alnum:]-]+:[_[:alnum:]-]+$ is supposed to filter out lines like: Oct 17 14:49:24 myhost su[13469]: + /dev/pts/1 user1:root It is not working because the pattern dos not include the "/dev/" part and
2005 Jan 09
2
Bug#289529: logcheck: "Ghandi" should be "Gandhi" in README.how.to.interpret
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.32 Severity: minor "Ghandi" should be "Gandhi" in README.how.to.interpret, assuming that you mean the Indian freedom fighter M.K. Gandhi a.k.a. Mahatma Gandhi. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
2005 Feb 16
3
Bug#295560: logcheck: Please include filename when reporting "invalid regular expression"
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.34 Severity: wishlist I have a couple of home-made logcheck ignore files, and happened to have one unescaped (and unmatched) `(' in one of the filter lines. Because of this, cron sent a mail with the body "grep: Invalid regular expression" - the subject is the command in the "2 * * * *" line in /etc/cron.d/logcheck, of course. It would be
2013 Jan 18
1
5.9 logwatch yum filter broken
After the upgrade to CentOS 5.9, all my CentOS 5 installations report only "Unmatched Entries" in the "yum" section of their daily logwatch mails. It seems the filter script /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/yum got broken: --------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8<--------8< [root at dns01 ~]# /usr/sbin/logwatch --print --service yum
2005 Jan 20
2
Bug#291395: logcheck-database: Rules dirs are setuid, they should be setgid
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.33 Severity: normal I just installed 1.2.33, and it made my rules dirs setuid, not setgid... - Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of
2005 Jan 12
3
Bug#290195: violations.d/sudo and violations.ignore.d/logcheck-sudo missing sudo log entries
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.32 Severity: normal It seems when someone runs a sudo command on my system, logcheck misses it. The second line of /etc/logcheck/violations.d/sudo matches them, but the /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-sudo kills them. Furthermore, when users run commands like '$ sudo rm *' in a directory with lots of files, we reports with lines like: Jan 13
2004 May 28
2
Bug#251364: logcheck: preinst has bashism, fails with dash and LANG != C
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.20a Severity: serious Tags: patch On a system where sh points to dash and LANG=es_ES, I get this: # apt-get -y --reinstall install logcheck Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0% Leyendo lista de paquetes... 23% Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0% Creando ?rbol de
2005 Jan 14
3
Bug#290511: logcheck: syslogd restart in cron.daily/sysklogd causes a log message
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.32 Severity: wishlist /etc/cron.daily/sysklogd restarts syslogd at the end of the script. This causes a daily log message, currently missed by logcheck: Jan 14 06:55:22 pyloric syslogd 1.4.1#16: restart (remote reception). I'm currently using this regex in ignore.server.d/local-syslogd: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ syslogd 1\.4\.1#16: restart \(remote
2014 Apr 07
0
Processed: Re: Debian Bug 737613
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > submitter 737613 houndean+debbug at gmail.com Bug #737613 [xen-hypervisor-4.3-amd64] xen-hypervisor-4.3-amd: Xen not loading dom0 on Jessie - FATAL error on running /etc/init.d/xen Changed Bug submitter to 'houndean+debbug at gmail.com' from 'Steve Hnizdur <hounden+debbug at gmail.com>' > thanks Stopping processing
2015 Sep 17
0
CentOS-6 - LogWatch Cyrus-IMAPD script was CentOS-6 - LogWatch
On Mon, September 14, 2015 14:51, James B. Byrne wrote: > The Logwatch imapd service script distributed with CentOS-6 does not > generate anything when I run logwatch --service all on a cyrus-imapd > host. Is this expected behaviour? Is there a separate script for > cyrus-imapd or are their configuration options required to get the > existing script to work. > > I have found
2009 Aug 25
1
logcheck vs auditd
Hello, I was just looking into parsing some various logs to get notified when my application is not behaving correctly. Logcheck seems like the right tool but then I also notice auditd which is another log monitoring/reporting tool. Can someone explain if these two tools serve similar purposes or do they each have a different purpose? I've done a bit of reading but figure someone here
2005 Jun 14
3
Bug#313601: logcheck-database: ignore mount version messages
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: wishlist These are the subject of an am-utils FAQ <URL:http://www.am-utils.org/docs/am-utils/FAQ.txt> and would be useful in the ignored list. Note that it's either `newer' or `older'. Jun 14 14:32:25 albion kernel: nfs warning: mount version newer than kernel Jun 14 14:37:54 dlsy kernel: nfs warning: mount version older
2013 Aug 16
0
Processed (with 1 errors): forcibly merging 681293 711923
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 681293 711923 Bug #681293 [apt-listchanges] apt-listchanges should try to get the changelog from control.tar first Unable to merge bugs because: package of #711923 is 'xen-utils-common' not 'apt-listchanges' Failed to forcibly merge 681293: Did not alter merged bugs
2013 Aug 16
0
Processed (with 1 errors): forcibly merging 711273 711923
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 711273 711923 Bug #711273 [xen-hypervisor-4.2-amd64] xen-hypervisor-4.2-amd64: Acn't re-create domains after migration from 4.1 to 4.2 Unable to merge bugs because: package of #711923 is 'xen-utils-common' not 'xen-hypervisor-4.2-amd64' Failed to forcibly merge 711273: Did not alter merged bugs
2013 Aug 16
0
Processed (with 1 errors): merging 691734 709103
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > merge 691734 709103 Bug #691734 [xen-utils-common] xen-utils-common should install successfully even if xen cannot be started Unable to merge bugs because: severity of #709103 is 'normal' not 'important' Failed to merge 691734: Did not alter merged bugs Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript',
2013 Aug 16
0
Processed (with 1 errors): forcibly merging 711923 711273
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 711923 711273 Bug #711923 [xen-utils-common] xen-utils-common: After run 'xm create ...' i got error "Error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind' Unable to merge bugs because: package of #711273 is 'xen-hypervisor-4.2-amd64' not 'xen-utils-common' Failed to forcibly merge 711923:
2014 Aug 29
0
Processed (with 1 errors): merging 757724 751894
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > merge 757724 751894 Bug #757724 [src:xen] Multiple security issues Unable to merge bugs because: package of #751894 is 'xen' not 'src:xen' Failed to merge 757724: Did not alter merged bugs Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x34d0490)', 'requester', 'Ian Campbell <ijc at