similar to: Bug#344553: logcheck: Fails silently to read config file

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Bug#344553: logcheck: Fails silently to read config file"

2005 Mar 06
3
Bug#298291: logcheck-database: Printer out-of-paper reported
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.34 Severity: minor I have parallel port attached printer and kernel reports whenever printer is out of paper: Mar 6 12:38:50 host kernel: lp0 out of paper However, this is not a situation that should be reported by default (IMHO) by logcheck sending report email. Thus I propose adding following line to ignore.d.workstation/logcheck (possibly to .server
2005 Jan 20
2
Bug#291395: logcheck-database: Rules dirs are setuid, they should be setgid
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.33 Severity: normal I just installed 1.2.33, and it made my rules dirs setuid, not setgid... - Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of
2005 Sep 15
2
Bug#328632: Please include README.logcheck-database.gz
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.41 Severity: minor man (8) logcheck says: For hints on how to maintain rules, see README.logcheck-database.gz, but this file is not included in /usr/share/doc/logcheck. micah -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel:
2005 Aug 31
3
Bug#325801: logcheck: new regex to filter imap "Moved xxx bytes of new mail" messages
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.41 Severity: wishlist Hi folks, thanks for your work maintaining logcheck, it works well. When my users read their mail using imap (usually via squirrelmail, not sure about other clients) I get a message like this in the log: Aug 22 21:03:32 phoenix imapd[6551]: Moved 11323 bytes of new mail to /home/winky/mail/mbox from /var/spool/mail/winky host= localhost
2004 Oct 21
3
Bug#277636: logcheck-database: support for dnsmasq
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.28 Severity: wishlist Could you add support for dnsmasq for the server profile? This is the standard dnsmasq output. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: read /etc/hosts - [[:digit:]]+ addresses$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: reading /etc/resolv.conf$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2005 Aug 23
5
Bug#324615: new rules for imp4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.41 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, here is one line for the imp4 package and one (I don't have more) line from the log file. Same as with the horde3 file: I've tested it and CC this mail to the maintainer. by, Martin - -- Powered by Debian GNU / Linux -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG
2005 Apr 02
3
Bug#302744: logcheck-database: postfix rules
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.36 Severity: wishlist Hello, I recently blew away my old logcheck-databse and lost a number of changes that i had made to postfix entries. The default database for postfix reports the following errors that do not seem to be important... Apr 2 13:00:19 terminus postfix/local[29516]: 574B9B3B9F: to=<doug at localhost>, relay=local, delay=13,
2005 Jun 14
3
Bug#313601: logcheck-database: ignore mount version messages
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: wishlist These are the subject of an am-utils FAQ <URL:http://www.am-utils.org/docs/am-utils/FAQ.txt> and would be useful in the ignored list. Note that it's either `newer' or `older'. Jun 14 14:32:25 albion kernel: nfs warning: mount version newer than kernel Jun 14 14:37:54 dlsy kernel: nfs warning: mount version older
2004 Dec 20
3
Bug#286532: dnsmasq: misses message for DHCPINFORM due to 283331 fix
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.32 Severity: normal Tags: patch The fix for 283331 exposed a bug in the dnsmasq rules. The rule was looking for DHCPINFO, but the actual message is DHCPINFORM. Prior to the 283331 fix, the old rule worked, because the "[()[:alnum:]]+" part of the rule matched the "RM" at the end of DHCPINFORM. -- System Information: Debian Release:
2005 Apr 07
1
Bug#303661: logcheck-database: openntpd rules
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.37 Severity: normal Hello again, openntpd gives messages like these failry often: Apr 7 14:25:55 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now invalid Apr 7 14:26:10 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now valid I am not sure if this is something that an admin may find relevant but they happen fairly often and they do not offer a lot of info for me.
2005 Jul 11
3
Bug#317741: logcheck-database: fails to ignore properly some lines from 'rbldnsd'
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.40 Severity: normal Tags: patch There are one line that is not properly ignored. I include in the report a better version. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (400, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale:
2004 May 26
5
Bug#251046: logcheck: invalid mktemp -p option
Package: logcheck Version: 1.1.1-13.1woody1 Severity: important logcheck line 56 uses "TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d -p ..." but mktemp from woody doesn't accept -p option Cheers, Chris -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux ethlife-a 2.4.26-vs1.27 #4 SMP Mit Apr 28 15:20:15 MEST 2004 i686 unknown Versions of the packages logcheck depends on: ii cron
2009 Aug 18
2
Bug#542265: sendmail-base and logcheck-database: error when trying to install together
Package: logcheck-database,sendmail-base Version: logcheck-database/1.2.69 Version: sendmail-base/8.14.3-9 Severity: serious User: treinen at debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2009-08-18 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the
2004 May 15
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/src
On Sat, 15 May 2004, CVS User ttroxell wrote: > if [ -f /etc/logcheck/header.txt ] ; then > - $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report > + $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report \ > + || error "Could not append header to $TMPDIR/report Disk full?" > fi > } > > @@ -152,7 +157,8 @@ > # Add a footer
2004 Jun 04
2
Bug#252597: logcheck: user logchecks mails should be delivered to root
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.20a Severity: important Since logcheck changed to run as user logcheck, the error mails of the cron daemon end up in /var/mail/logcheck where nobody reads them. Mails for logcheck should be aliased to root like all the other mails of system accounts. I was searching for a long time what was wrong with my logcheck not delivering any mails. The lock directory was
2005 Feb 16
3
Bug#295560: logcheck: Please include filename when reporting "invalid regular expression"
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.34 Severity: wishlist I have a couple of home-made logcheck ignore files, and happened to have one unescaped (and unmatched) `(' in one of the filter lines. Because of this, cron sent a mail with the body "grep: Invalid regular expression" - the subject is the command in the "2 * * * *" line in /etc/cron.d/logcheck, of course. It would be
2006 Mar 26
2
Bug#355949: run-parts vs. find
The changelog for version 1.2.43 says the reason for switching to 'find' from 'run-parts': * Use 'find' instead of 'run-parts' to list the contents of directories since 'run-parts' cannot handle filenames with periods. Update control to depend on findutils. It seems like not processing rule files with dots in them would be a feaure, not a bug.
2005 Jun 03
2
[ttroxell@debian.org: Re: Logcheck rules from other packages]
I'm not sure if this message ever made it to you, Jamie. I had a reverse DNS problem shortly after it was sent. ----- Forwarded message from Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org> ----- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:22:18 -0400 From: Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org> To: "Jamie L. Penman-Smithson" <jamie at silverdream.org> Subject: Re: Logcheck rules from other
2006 Jul 04
1
no such user
I have rules like this on my servers: ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ proftpd\[[[:digit:]]+\]: [._[:alnum:]-]+ \([._[:alnum:]-]+\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\) (- )USER [-_.[:alnum:]]+: no such user found from [._[:alnum:]-]+ \[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\ to [[:digit:].]{7,15}:21$ basically, I just don't care about logins as nonexistent users, I get so many of those that I don't even
2005 Dec 24
1
Bug#344620: ignore.server.d/postfix: 'address not listed for hostname' rule
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.42 Severity: normal Tags: patch Index: postfix =================================================================== --- postfix (revision 1097) +++ postfix (working copy) @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ # Postfix < 2.1 ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtp\[[0-9]+\]: connect to [^[:space:]]+: server dropped connection without sending the initial greeting