Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Bug#344553: logcheck: Fails silently to read config file"
2005 Mar 06
3
Bug#298291: logcheck-database: Printer out-of-paper reported
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.34
Severity: minor
I have parallel port attached printer and kernel reports whenever
printer is out of paper:
Mar 6 12:38:50 host kernel: lp0 out of paper
However, this is not a situation that should be reported by default
(IMHO) by logcheck sending report email. Thus I propose adding
following line to ignore.d.workstation/logcheck (possibly to .server
2005 Jan 20
2
Bug#291395: logcheck-database: Rules dirs are setuid, they should be setgid
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.33
Severity: normal
I just installed 1.2.33, and it made my rules dirs setuid, not setgid...
- Marc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of
2005 Sep 15
2
Bug#328632: Please include README.logcheck-database.gz
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.41
Severity: minor
man (8) logcheck says:
For hints on how to maintain rules, see README.logcheck-database.gz,
but this file is not included in /usr/share/doc/logcheck.
micah
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel:
2005 Aug 31
3
Bug#325801: logcheck: new regex to filter imap "Moved xxx bytes of new mail" messages
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.41
Severity: wishlist
Hi folks, thanks for your work maintaining logcheck, it works well.
When my users read their mail using imap (usually via squirrelmail,
not sure about other clients) I get a message like this in the log:
Aug 22 21:03:32 phoenix imapd[6551]: Moved 11323 bytes of new mail to /home/winky/mail/mbox from /var/spool/mail/winky host= localhost
2004 Oct 21
3
Bug#277636: logcheck-database: support for dnsmasq
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.28
Severity: wishlist
Could you add support for dnsmasq for the server profile?
This is the standard dnsmasq output.
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: read /etc/hosts - [[:digit:]]+ addresses$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dnsmasq\[[[:digit:]]+\]: reading /etc/resolv.conf$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
2005 Aug 23
5
Bug#324615: new rules for imp4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.41
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
here is one line for the imp4 package and one (I don't have more) line
from the log file. Same as with the horde3 file: I've tested it and CC
this mail to the maintainer.
by, Martin
- --
Powered by Debian GNU / Linux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG
2005 Apr 02
3
Bug#302744: logcheck-database: postfix rules
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.36
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I recently blew away my old logcheck-databse and lost a number of changes that i had made to postfix entries. The default database for postfix reports the
following errors that do not seem to be important...
Apr 2 13:00:19 terminus postfix/local[29516]: 574B9B3B9F: to=<doug at localhost>, relay=local, delay=13,
2005 Jun 14
3
Bug#313601: logcheck-database: ignore mount version messages
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.39
Severity: wishlist
These are the subject of an am-utils FAQ
<URL:http://www.am-utils.org/docs/am-utils/FAQ.txt> and would be
useful in the ignored list. Note that it's either `newer' or `older'.
Jun 14 14:32:25 albion kernel: nfs warning: mount version newer than kernel
Jun 14 14:37:54 dlsy kernel: nfs warning: mount version older
2004 Dec 20
3
Bug#286532: dnsmasq: misses message for DHCPINFORM due to 283331 fix
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.32
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The fix for 283331 exposed a bug in the dnsmasq rules. The rule was
looking for DHCPINFO, but the actual message is DHCPINFORM. Prior to
the 283331 fix, the old rule worked, because the "[()[:alnum:]]+" part
of the rule matched the "RM" at the end of DHCPINFORM.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
2005 Apr 07
1
Bug#303661: logcheck-database: openntpd rules
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.37
Severity: normal
Hello again,
openntpd gives messages like these failry often:
Apr 7 14:25:55 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now invalid
Apr 7 14:26:10 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now valid
I am not sure if this is something that an admin may find relevant but they happen fairly often and they do not offer a lot of info
for me.
2005 Jul 11
3
Bug#317741: logcheck-database: fails to ignore properly some lines from 'rbldnsd'
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.40
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
There are one line that is not properly ignored. I include in the report
a better version.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (400, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale:
2004 May 26
5
Bug#251046: logcheck: invalid mktemp -p option
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.1.1-13.1woody1
Severity: important
logcheck line 56 uses "TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d -p ..." but mktemp from
woody doesn't accept -p option
Cheers, Chris
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux ethlife-a 2.4.26-vs1.27 #4 SMP Mit Apr 28 15:20:15 MEST 2004 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages logcheck depends on:
ii cron
2009 Aug 18
2
Bug#542265: sendmail-base and logcheck-database: error when trying to install together
Package: logcheck-database,sendmail-base
Version: logcheck-database/1.2.69
Version: sendmail-base/8.14.3-9
Severity: serious
User: treinen at debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-08-18
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the
2004 May 15
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/src
On Sat, 15 May 2004, CVS User ttroxell wrote:
> if [ -f /etc/logcheck/header.txt ] ; then
> - $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report
> + $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report \
> + || error "Could not append header to $TMPDIR/report Disk full?"
> fi
> }
>
> @@ -152,7 +157,8 @@
> # Add a footer
2004 Jun 04
2
Bug#252597: logcheck: user logchecks mails should be delivered to root
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.20a
Severity: important
Since logcheck changed to run as user logcheck, the error mails of the cron
daemon end up in /var/mail/logcheck where nobody reads them. Mails for
logcheck should be aliased to root like all the other mails of system
accounts.
I was searching for a long time what was wrong with my logcheck not
delivering any mails. The lock directory was
2005 Feb 16
3
Bug#295560: logcheck: Please include filename when reporting "invalid regular expression"
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.34
Severity: wishlist
I have a couple of home-made logcheck ignore files, and happened to
have one unescaped (and unmatched) `(' in one of the filter
lines. Because of this, cron sent a mail with the body "grep: Invalid
regular expression" - the subject is the command in the "2 * * * *"
line in /etc/cron.d/logcheck, of course.
It would be
2006 Mar 26
2
Bug#355949: run-parts vs. find
The changelog for version 1.2.43 says the reason for switching to
'find' from 'run-parts':
* Use 'find' instead of 'run-parts' to list the contents of
directories since 'run-parts' cannot handle filenames with periods.
Update control to depend on findutils.
It seems like not processing rule files with dots in them would be a
feaure, not a bug.
2005 Jun 03
2
[ttroxell@debian.org: Re: Logcheck rules from other packages]
I'm not sure if this message ever made it to you, Jamie. I had a reverse DNS
problem shortly after it was sent.
----- Forwarded message from Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org> -----
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:22:18 -0400
From: Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org>
To: "Jamie L. Penman-Smithson" <jamie at silverdream.org>
Subject: Re: Logcheck rules from other
2006 Jul 04
1
no such user
I have rules like this on my servers:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ proftpd\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
[._[:alnum:]-]+ \([._[:alnum:]-]+\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\) (- )USER
[-_.[:alnum:]]+: no such user found from [._[:alnum:]-]+
\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\ to [[:digit:].]{7,15}:21$
basically, I just don't care about logins as nonexistent users,
I get so many of those that I don't even
2005 Dec 24
1
Bug#344620: ignore.server.d/postfix: 'address not listed for hostname' rule
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.42
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Index: postfix
===================================================================
--- postfix (revision 1097)
+++ postfix (working copy)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
# Postfix < 2.1
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtp\[[0-9]+\]: connect to [^[:space:]]+: server dropped connection without sending the initial greeting