Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Bug#302379: use dh_installlogcheck in logcheck-database instead?"
2005 Jun 03
2
[ttroxell@debian.org: Re: Logcheck rules from other packages]
I'm not sure if this message ever made it to you, Jamie. I had a reverse DNS
problem shortly after it was sent.
----- Forwarded message from Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org> -----
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:22:18 -0400
From: Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org>
To: "Jamie L. Penman-Smithson" <jamie at silverdream.org>
Subject: Re: Logcheck rules from other
2004 Aug 28
1
Bug#268277: logcheck documentation bug
/usr/share/doc/logcheck-database/README.logcheck-database.gz
Do you think that this file is insufficient, or did you just not see it?
If the latter is the case, perhaps I should add a pointer to it in
logcheck.8.
Cheers,
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org ||
2006 Jul 03
1
New logcheck committer
Martin F. Krafft (madduck) has been added to the project.
P.S. I'd like to get a release out sometime next week.
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
2005 Jan 23
2
logcheck-database -- volatile?
A new archive was announced for packages that have need for frequent changes
[see below]. In theory, we should not have to update logcheck rules in
Sarge, because we know that it's packages, with the exception of security
updates will remain constant.
This does not change the fact that we may wish to update the database on
sarge <:
Any thoughts?
-Todd
----- Forwarded message from
2004 May 15
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/src
On Sat, 15 May 2004, CVS User ttroxell wrote:
> if [ -f /etc/logcheck/header.txt ] ; then
> - $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report
> + $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report \
> + || error "Could not append header to $TMPDIR/report Disk full?"
> fi
> }
>
> @@ -152,7 +157,8 @@
> # Add a footer
2004 Jun 13
1
intermittent access this week
Hey team,
I'll be at sea on and off this week, and as such my Internet access will
depend on wifi availability while in port. 22a seems stable, but if any
critical problems arise, feel free to prepare a release and bug Alfie
to upload it.
On the brighter side, I expect to be extremely bored while offline so I'll
probably get some logcheck work done. <:
Cheers,
--
[ Todd J.
2004 Jun 28
0
Bug#212149: current date/hostname macros
Agreed, this seems relatively worthless.
Feel free to prove otherwise. Until then, I'm closing this.
Thanks,
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat `. `'
`-
2004 Sep 06
2
Bug#270019: serial/lp rules for logcheck
At the moment I've no host with which to test ppp/lp things on. If you (or
anyone) could provide complete regexes, (each beginning with ^ and ending with
$) I will patch the rules accordingly.
If not, sending the full log lines is a good start.
Thanks!
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek :
2004 Dec 25
2
Bug#287184: logcheck overwriting ownership/permissions of /etc/logcheck/* on upgrades
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.32
Severity: important
In postinst logcheck "fixes" permissions of /etc/logcheck/* to 750.
In my (and others on #d-d) opinion ownership and permissions should be
preserved upon package upgrades. Logcheck must not screw with my
decision to make them world readable every time it configures.
--
Peter
2005 Jan 08
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/debian
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005, CVS User ttroxell wrote:
> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@
> chown logcheck /var/lock/logcheck > /dev/null 2>&1 || true
> fi
>
> + # fix for #284788
> + # update timestamp on cron
> + touch /etc/cron.d/logcheck || true
> +
> ;;
>
> abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
on a box with a broken coreutils install
2004 May 21
2
Bug#247360: logcheck: Where's NEWS.Debian?
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.20a
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #247360
I can't find NEWS.Debian in the package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R
Versions of packages logcheck depends on:
ii adduser
2004 Jun 04
2
Bug#252597: logcheck: user logchecks mails should be delivered to root
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.20a
Severity: important
Since logcheck changed to run as user logcheck, the error mails of the cron
daemon end up in /var/mail/logcheck where nobody reads them. Mails for
logcheck should be aliased to root like all the other mails of system
accounts.
I was searching for a long time what was wrong with my logcheck not
delivering any mails. The lock directory was
2005 Feb 16
3
Bug#295560: logcheck: Please include filename when reporting "invalid regular expression"
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.34
Severity: wishlist
I have a couple of home-made logcheck ignore files, and happened to
have one unescaped (and unmatched) `(' in one of the filter
lines. Because of this, cron sent a mail with the body "grep: Invalid
regular expression" - the subject is the command in the "2 * * * *"
line in /etc/cron.d/logcheck, of course.
It would be
2005 Jan 20
2
Bug#291395: logcheck-database: Rules dirs are setuid, they should be setgid
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.33
Severity: normal
I just installed 1.2.33, and it made my rules dirs setuid, not setgid...
- Marc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of
2006 Jul 04
1
no such user
I have rules like this on my servers:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ proftpd\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
[._[:alnum:]-]+ \([._[:alnum:]-]+\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\) (- )USER
[-_.[:alnum:]]+: no such user found from [._[:alnum:]-]+
\[[[:digit:].]{7,15}\]\ to [[:digit:].]{7,15}:21$
basically, I just don't care about logins as nonexistent users,
I get so many of those that I don't even
2005 Jan 09
2
Bug#289529: logcheck: "Ghandi" should be "Gandhi" in README.how.to.interpret
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.32
Severity: minor
"Ghandi" should be "Gandhi" in README.how.to.interpret, assuming that
you mean the Indian freedom fighter M.K. Gandhi a.k.a. Mahatma Gandhi.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
2005 Dec 23
4
Bug#344553: logcheck: Fails silently to read config file
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.42
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Logcheck does not report any error if the config file is not readable
or does not exists. This may easily happen, as logcheck is run as
logcheck user and while one is testing a new configuration on live
system with running configuration intact.
Following fragment may help:
# Now source the config file - before things that should
2006 Jul 08
2
building the logcheck package from SVN
apt-get install svn-buildpackage
cat <<_eof >> ~/.svn-buildpackage.conf
svn-lintian
svn-linda
svn-move
_eof
mkdir logcheck; cd logcheck
svn co svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/logcheck/logcheck/trunk
cd trunk
svn-buildpackage -k<your key ID> -rfakeroot
man svn-buildpackage for more. Nice, huh?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :' :
2004 May 28
2
Bug#251364: logcheck: preinst has bashism, fails with dash and LANG != C
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.20a
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
On a system where sh points to dash and LANG=es_ES, I get this:
# apt-get -y --reinstall install logcheck
Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0%
Leyendo lista de paquetes... 0%
Leyendo lista de paquetes... 23%
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0%
Creando ?rbol de dependencias... 0%
Creando ?rbol de
2005 Oct 29
1
Bug#336265: logrotate detection, possible attack not checked by logcheck
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.41
Problem: Logcheck try to detect if log file have been rotate or not by file size way.
Possible attack:
- current log file (sizeA)
- run logcheck, (logcheck/logtail put inode in offsetfile), offset=sizeA
- [attacker run attack 1]
- run logrotate
- [attacker run attack 2]
- run logcheck may don't detect the rotation and don't check the log for attack 1