similar to: RSpec and namespaced controllers

I have a couple of domains on my server, all of them namespaced with a dot. It's 10-15 mailboxes at the most. Is there good way to convert them to / (slash) namespaced folders? Maybe some bash script lying around somewhere?

I''m stucking trying to figure out how to write a spec for a namespaced controller. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Marcus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070419/75a167fa/attachment.html

Hello, http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/9742 If anyone is annoyed by that, please find a moment to review the patch. It''s rather tiny and tested enough. It still applies cleanly (r8962) as I write this. Thanks, Jacek Becela --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core"

Hi all, Just wondering about this: I''ve been dealing with classes/modules nested in several layers of namespaces. Here would be an example of a describe block: describe ClassOne::ClassTwo::ClassThree, "description here" do ... end What would be the easiest way to write something a little more terse, like: describe ClassThree, "description here" do ... end

Hi, I have the followed Rails 3 routes: Hello::Application.routes.draw do resources :blogs do resources :articles do resources :comments end end end By raking them, we can find (for instance): GET /blogs/:blog_id/articles(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"articles"} Because every routes begin with the

Whenever I try and use a .js.erb view in my nested routes it tries to look for a layout(i.e. admin.js.erb). any ideas on how to stop this other than calling :layout => false? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

I have a site, where I am currently adding a self-built shop. Among other stuff I have this construction in my route-file map.namespace :shop do |shop| shop.resources :categories do |categories| categories.resources :products end end I like the namespace, since it encapsulates the shop nicely inside my webapplication. Somehow I would like the url "http://mysite.com/shop" to

https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/1402 Can we expect support for that in Rails 3.1.0 ? Robert Pankowecki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For

I am dealing with a large project. I use a lot of STI and therfore have a lot of models. I''d like to use namespaces to help organize my models but am having trouble getting started. I have a base model Term::Base located in /app/models/term/base.rb: class Term::Base < ActiveRecord::Base set_table_name "terms" end I have a non-namespaced client model: class Client <

Hi, I have one controller in the /app/controllers/animals_controller.rb directory, and another in /app/controllers/production/services_controller.rb. The thing is that one Animal has many Services, and i''d like to access to them using something like: http://localhost:3000/animals/1/production/services/1 or at least with: http://localhost:3000/animals/1/services/1 I tried the last one

Hi, Attached are links to two patches I submitted via the RoR Trac system a week or so ago: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8305 http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8308 I refrained from creating a new Trac ticket for ARes, which will be affected if both of these patches are accepted by Core. There are a couple of workarounds for this issue, but it would be nice for AR, AS and ARes to output

Out of curiosity, I''ve seen the following fail: module Admin describe MyController ... end end But this works fine: describe Admin::MyController .. end Why? Scott

Hi, I was wondering if anyone came across a similar scenario when working with namespaced routes with edge rails. Consider an application with controllers customers and products that also have other resources. map.resources :customers do |customer| customer.resources :notes customer.resources :tags end map.resources :products do |product| customer.resources :notes customer.resources

Hello, The CRAN checks for the drake package (4.1.0) fail for r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang. This happened right when crayon 1.3.4 was released, but I suspect the problem is not with crayon or drake, but with base R-devel. I cannot reproduce the error myself, but I have copied a minimal working example (MWE) below that should theoretically isolate the problem. `find_namespaced_functions()`

Hello everyone, Do you feel it? The little shiver down your spine when you think of "namespacing" in rails? To some thats a common feeling, to people like myself who enforce absolute organization have already thought about the need for namespaces in rails. Now I do understand this is an ongoing effort... to some degree. Controllers and routes, from my experiences work well, that being,

Hi all, I was hoping someone could please clarify the differences between a full engine and a mountable one. I have noticed the following: ** Full Engine ** - With a full engine, the parent application inherits the routes from the engine. It is not necessary to specify anything in parent_app/ config/routes.rb. Specifying the gem in Gemfile is enough. The engine routes are specified as: #

I am writing a controller admin/cities_controller.rb it inherits from AdminController, so it''s defined like class Admin::CitiesController > AdminController Whenever I save the controller file, autotest freaks out: uninitialized constant Admin::AdminController (NameError) I''m pretty used to just hitting CTRL-C to get autotest to re-load all the files, or flicking to

Hi r-devel If you define a function named `show` or attach a package with an exported `show` function, then printing/vieweing S4 objects breaks. This is probably because the `print` function calls `show`, which is now masked. Example: show <- function() {} > setClass("Person", slots = list(name = "character")) > tom <- new("Person", name =

Like lots of other folks, I''ve been searching for a way to scratch my fixture itches. Rathole is my extraction of a few techniques we''ve successfully applied at my day job. We''ve been using Rathole for a month or so now, but I''d really like some feedback from a wider audience. Rathole tackles: * Conflicting PK''s (no more id''s in fixture

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:44 AM Eric Christopher via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016, 6:41 PM Xinliang David Li via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> Sounds fine to me, though I am not a fan of using unstable in the option. >> I think a more meaningful way (that capture the essence of the