similar to: logcheck_1.2.37_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.36 Severity: wishlist Hello, I recently blew away my old logcheck-databse and lost a number of changes that i had made to postfix entries. The default database for postfix reports the following errors that do not seem to be important... Apr 2 13:00:19 terminus postfix/local[29516]: 574B9B3B9F: to=<doug at localhost>, relay=local, delay=13,

Accepted: logcheck-database_1.2.27_all.deb to pool/main/l/logcheck/logcheck-database_1.2.27_all.deb logcheck_1.2.27.dsc to pool/main/l/logcheck/logcheck_1.2.27.dsc logcheck_1.2.27.tar.gz to pool/main/l/logcheck/logcheck_1.2.27.tar.gz logcheck_1.2.27_all.deb to pool/main/l/logcheck/logcheck_1.2.27_all.deb logtail_1.2.27_all.deb to pool/main/l/logcheck/logtail_1.2.27_all.deb Announcing to

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.37 Severity: normal Hello again, openntpd gives messages like these failry often: Apr 7 14:25:55 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now invalid Apr 7 14:26:10 terminus ntpd[673]: peer 204.17.42.202 now valid I am not sure if this is something that an admin may find relevant but they happen fairly often and they do not offer a lot of info for me.

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal The rule for SSH ignoring "Bad protocol version identification" assumes there are no single quotes inside the version string ('[^']'). I am however getting mails including those lines: Mar 25 22:57:04 Debian-60-squeeze-64-minimal sshd[12144]: Bad protocol version identification

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.8 Severity: wishlist HI, can you please create a rule/some rules for amavis(d-new). I get for every mail this mesage: May 25 19:55:40 data amavis[9603]: (09603-15) Passed CLEAN, [::1] [213.165.64.22] <xxx at yyy.zz> -> \ <aaa at localhost>, Message-ID: <20100525175015.29677page1 at mx002.bbb.ccc>, mail_id: MM7upJv6se1Z, \ Hits:

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal Tags: patch After upgrading to debian squeeze I get several messages a day in the form of: Jul 2 15:05:15 hostname spamd[21286]: spamd: handled cleanup of child pid [28609] due to SIGCHLD: exit 0 This is due to an update in spamd, that makes the message more detailed (includes exit code)[1]. Therefore messages including exit code 0

Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal Hi, at present my logcheck is into 33 minutes of cpu time for running the ignore/innd rule, when the innd package is not installed. If running logcheck against only locally created logfiles, there should be a configuration option to only run logcheck against installed (or non-purged) packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid

commit 81496d0cf7b161bf981d51f0b96f860d68f3f6e3 Author: Micah Anderson <micah at debian.org> Date: Fri Aug 24 17:51:31 2007 -0400 Enable alternate temporary directory to be set in the configuration file On servers where the logfiles are very large and grow quickly, the logcheck processes may run into space issues in /tmp resulting in the email such as the following to be

Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.14 Severity: normal Tags: patch I keep getting these messages logged, when under high load. This patch should clean that up. commit 72661acccafa519fcb48a6a756e5c35d96e7511d Author: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn at axis.com> Date: Fri Jan 27 16:08:33 2012 +0100 Workaround for error: /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (31667)

Hello I try to execute logcheck from a php page. So I have create a php page with a button which allow to run logcheck like this : /usr/sbin/logcheck -o > /var/log/logcheck (I want to put the result in a file logcheck, that's why I use the option -o) I have put www-data in the groupe adm : "adduser www-data adm" And after if I run logcheck like this for exemple:

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 302689 pending Bug#302689: treats non-zero egrep exit status as failure Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Hello, I'm having this error: Warning: If you are seeing this message, your log files may not have been checked! Details: Could not run logtail or save output Check temporary directory: /tmp/logcheck.EIX3jp declare -x HOME="/var/lib/logcheck" declare -x LANG="en_US" declare -x LANGUAGE="en_US:en_GB:en" declare -x LOGNAME="logcheck" declare -x

Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.14 Severity: normal I added a local.rules file to ignore.d.server and then ran logcheck. The file was not used during the run. Renaming it to local-rules got the file used during the next run. Fix: periods should be allowed in filenames, or the fact that they are forbidden expressly documented inteh logcheck README. Thanks Nils -- System Information: Debian

The entry is probably not igored because of the word deny in your path . You might better set your rule in violation.ignore.d/ directory. At 13:00 09/01/2006, you wrote: >Send Logcheck-users mailing list submissions to > logcheck-users@lists.alioth.debian.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Package: logcheck Version: 1.1.1-13.1woody1 Severity: important logcheck line 56 uses "TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d -p ..." but mktemp from woody doesn't accept -p option Cheers, Chris -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux ethlife-a 2.4.26-vs1.27 #4 SMP Mit Apr 28 15:20:15 MEST 2004 i686 unknown Versions of the packages logcheck depends on: ii cron

Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal Various files under ignore.d.* use "[0-9.]{7,15}" to match an IPv4 address, e.g., a connection to rsyncd. However, this does not match IPv6 addresses, causing spurious reports. A better regexp might be something like: ([0-9.]{7,15}|[0-9a-f:]{2,39}) -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990,

hello russel, On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, russell at coker.com.au wrote: .. > I would like to be able to have different parts of the report sent to > different people. For example if I install a new daemon on a server > I want the messages for that daemon going only to me (not the entire > admin team) until I get it working properly. Otherwise excessive > spurious messages lead

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.56 Followup-For: Bug #429384 I get the following message in my e-mail from cron: Cron <logcheck at entercom> if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 645: mktemp: command not found /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 646: mktemp: command not found rm: too few arguments Try `rm --help' for more information.

Hi guys, now that violations.d/logcheck is empty, violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* are useless and many messages that were previously elevated and filtered there now turn up as system events. Thus, I went ahead and merged violations.ignore.d/logcheck-* into ignore.d.*/* in the viol-merge branch. http://git.debian.org/?p=logcheck/logcheck.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/viol-merge Unless I hear

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.35 Severity: normal I'm getting the following on two different Unstable boxen: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subject: Cron <logcheck at bandit-hall> if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi