Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Bug#296017: logcheck: ignore.d.server pure-ftpd user with trailing whitespace"
2010 Feb 17
1
Bug#570207: logcheck wu-ftpd rules do'nt match
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.69
Severity: normal
In the file /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/wu-ftpd
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ wu-ftpd: PAM-listfile: Refused user [._[:alnum:]-]+ for service wu-ftpd$
should be
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ wu-ftpd\[[0-9]{4}\]: PAM-listfile: Refused user [._[:alnum:]-]+ for service wu-ftpd$
There is a number after "wu-ftpd"
-- System
2005 Feb 16
3
Bug#295560: logcheck: Please include filename when reporting "invalid regular expression"
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.34
Severity: wishlist
I have a couple of home-made logcheck ignore files, and happened to
have one unescaped (and unmatched) `(' in one of the filter
lines. Because of this, cron sent a mail with the body "grep: Invalid
regular expression" - the subject is the command in the "2 * * * *"
line in /etc/cron.d/logcheck, of course.
It would be
2004 Oct 13
2
Bug#276317: logcheck-database: Namechange for ISC in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dhcp
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.28
Severity: normal
Hi,
the Internet Software Consortium changed the name to Internet Systems Consortium.
For a fix for the logcheck rules see the attachment.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel:
2007 Nov 17
2
pure-ftpd-1.0.22
Hi,
anyone successfully compiled
http://download.pureftpd.org/pub/pure-ftpd/snapshots/pure-ftpd-1.0.22.tar.bz2
Thanks,
David
2004 Oct 11
1
Bug#275946: Acknowledgement (newline not recognized when logcheck sends emails)
I upgraded to 1.2.28, same results.
Here are the rules I added.
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ perdition\[[0-9]+\]: Connect:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[NOTICE\]
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[INFO\]
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ exact\[[0-9]+\]:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ slapd\[[0-9]+\]:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}
2004 Jul 15
5
Bug#259603: logcheck-database: postfix/lmtp rules do not match some configurations
package: logcheck-database
version: 1.2.23
severity: wishlist
The current regexp's for postfix/lmtp..
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/lmtp\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9A-F]:
to=<[^[:space:]]+>, orig_to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[^[:space:]]+\],
delay=[0-9]+ status=sent \(250 2\.1\.5 Ok\)$
..doesn't catch these messages:
Jul 15 17:15:16 lorien postfix/lmtp[17151]: C1170480008B:
2005 Feb 12
3
Bug#294950: logcheck: ignore.d.server courier imaplogin: DISCONNECTED not matching
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.34
Severity: normal
the ignore.d.server pattern for courier 'imaplogin: DISCONNECTED' does
not match the following line:
Feb 12 16:19:47 backup imaplogin: DISCONNECTED,
user=example at example.com, ip=[::ffff:111.111.111.111],
headers=14013, body=0, time=1
This line should be ignored like the other DISCONNECTED messages. Or am
I wrong?
-- System
2005 Mar 22
3
Bug#300888: logcheck-database: database skip postgrey ignore pattern
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.35
Severity: minor
logcheck-database contain postgrey ignore file, but postgrey first
attempt is listed in logcheck report
$ dpkg -l postgrey
ii postgrey 1.18-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-C3EZRA
Locale: LANG=it_IT,
2005 May 19
3
Bug#309772: please add ignore lines for autossh
Package: logcheck-database
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
if autossh debug is enabled it logs to syslog, thus the messages go thru
logcheck, messages are in this form
May 19 14:02:55 sagara autossh[1909]: port set to 0, monitoring disabled
so this is the ignore line
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ autossh\[[0-9]+\]: .*$
thanks,
filippo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment
2006 Feb 22
2
Bug#353962: integrate courier file in logcheck-database
Package: courier-imap-ssl,logcheck-database
Severity: wishlist
Please move /etc/logcheck/*/courier to the courier packages and out
of logcheck-database.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
2005 Feb 05
1
Missing/Wrong ignore.d for pureftp
Dear logcheck Team,
sorry for choosing the direct contact I don't know if it's the correct
way.
I am using logcheck on a webserver where pureftp is installed for upload
of content. Logcheck is working fine except for one ignore.d rule
regarding the logout messages from pureftp.
Logcheck is reporting lots (an I mean lots) of messages from the
following type:
Feb 5 06:02:45 web1
2006 Feb 11
1
Bug#352337: please tighten permissions on /etc/logcheck
Package: logcheck
Severity: wishlist
I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions
than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
2000 Jun 23
1
Security Update: wu-ftpd vulnerability
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
______________________________________________________________________________
Caldera Systems, Inc. Security Advisory
Subject: wu-ftpd vulnerability
Advisory number: CSSA-2000-020.0
Issue date: 2000 June, 23
Cross reference:
______________________________________________________________________________
1. Problem Description
There is
2005 Apr 28
1
Bug#306695: nagios: logcheck lines, please
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 22:10 -0400, Steve Gran wrote:
> ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ nagios: EXTERNAL COMMAND: PROCESS_SERVICE_CHECK_RESULT
>
> (although that may be too broad)
Can you provide the log messages that this matches?
Thanks,
--
-jamie <jamie at silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam at silverdream.org
w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms at silverdream.org
pgp
2004 Dec 01
3
need help with wu-ftpd
Hi! I'm kind new to linux, I just got my server with
CentOS 3.1 installed
I'm trying to install a ftp server to upload files,
but the wu-ftpd 2.6.2 doesn't work with autoconfigure
nor with
./build lnx
./build install
got error missing bin/ftpd
can you tell me step by step howto install o should I
user another ftp server...
thanks for your help
Fernando
2004 Nov 21
2
Bug#282378: logcheck-database: messages from USB joystick use
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.31
Severity: wishlist
The following is reported by logcheck when inserting a USB joystick for
the first time (workstation), none of which (I assume) I need to be
informed of.
Nov 21 17:50:08 localhost kernel: ohci_hcd 0000:00:01.2: wakeup
Nov 21 17:50:08 localhost kernel: usb 1-1: new low speed USB device using address 2
Nov 21 17:50:10 localhost kernel:
2005 Apr 29
3
Bug#303661: logcheck: More openntpd improvements
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.39
Followup-For: Bug #303661
Attached is another entry that suppresses the adjustment messages
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7-grsec
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages logcheck depends on:
ii
2006 Oct 09
3
ftpd that supports LDAP?
I did try that, but had difficulties in compiling it from source-- it's not in the yum repositories (either CentOS or Dag Wieers).
--
Jay Chandler
Network Administrator, Chapman University
714.628.7249 / chandler at chapman.edu
Ethernet, n. What one uses to catch the Etherbunny.
-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of
2005 Feb 20
1
Rename violations.ignore.d/logcheck-pureftp
<nitpickyness>
To avoid possible confusion, shouldn't this be named logcheck-pureftpd,
or logcheck-pure-ftpd (instead of logcheck-pureftp)?
Or is there a reason (that I've missed) it's this way?
</nitpickyness>
-j
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This
2006 Feb 09
1
Processed: Re: Bug#352043: dovecot-imapd: logcheck rules miss some lines
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 352043 logcheck
Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package
Bug reassigned from package `dovecot-common' to `logcheck'.
> retitle 352043 Please provide a backport of logcheck
Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package
Changed Bug title.
>