similar to: Bug#296017: logcheck: ignore.d.server pure-ftpd user with trailing whitespace

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Bug#296017: logcheck: ignore.d.server pure-ftpd user with trailing whitespace"

2010 Feb 17
1
Bug#570207: logcheck wu-ftpd rules do'nt match
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.69 Severity: normal In the file /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/wu-ftpd ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ wu-ftpd: PAM-listfile: Refused user [._[:alnum:]-]+ for service wu-ftpd$ should be ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ wu-ftpd\[[0-9]{4}\]: PAM-listfile: Refused user [._[:alnum:]-]+ for service wu-ftpd$ There is a number after "wu-ftpd" -- System
2005 Feb 16
3
Bug#295560: logcheck: Please include filename when reporting "invalid regular expression"
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.34 Severity: wishlist I have a couple of home-made logcheck ignore files, and happened to have one unescaped (and unmatched) `(' in one of the filter lines. Because of this, cron sent a mail with the body "grep: Invalid regular expression" - the subject is the command in the "2 * * * *" line in /etc/cron.d/logcheck, of course. It would be
2004 Oct 13
2
Bug#276317: logcheck-database: Namechange for ISC in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/dhcp
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.28 Severity: normal Hi, the Internet Software Consortium changed the name to Internet Systems Consortium. For a fix for the logcheck rules see the attachment. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel:
2007 Nov 17
2
pure-ftpd-1.0.22
Hi, anyone successfully compiled http://download.pureftpd.org/pub/pure-ftpd/snapshots/pure-ftpd-1.0.22.tar.bz2 Thanks, David
2004 Oct 11
1
Bug#275946: Acknowledgement (newline not recognized when logcheck sends emails)
I upgraded to 1.2.28, same results. Here are the rules I added. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ perdition\[[0-9]+\]: Connect: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[NOTICE\] ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[INFO\] ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ exact\[[0-9]+\]: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ slapd\[[0-9]+\]: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}
2004 Jul 15
5
Bug#259603: logcheck-database: postfix/lmtp rules do not match some configurations
package: logcheck-database version: 1.2.23 severity: wishlist The current regexp's for postfix/lmtp.. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/lmtp\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9A-F]: to=<[^[:space:]]+>, orig_to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[^[:space:]]+\], delay=[0-9]+ status=sent \(250 2\.1\.5 Ok\)$ ..doesn't catch these messages: Jul 15 17:15:16 lorien postfix/lmtp[17151]: C1170480008B:
2005 Feb 12
3
Bug#294950: logcheck: ignore.d.server courier imaplogin: DISCONNECTED not matching
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.34 Severity: normal the ignore.d.server pattern for courier 'imaplogin: DISCONNECTED' does not match the following line: Feb 12 16:19:47 backup imaplogin: DISCONNECTED, user=example at example.com, ip=[::ffff:111.111.111.111], headers=14013, body=0, time=1 This line should be ignored like the other DISCONNECTED messages. Or am I wrong? -- System
2005 Mar 22
3
Bug#300888: logcheck-database: database skip postgrey ignore pattern
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.35 Severity: minor logcheck-database contain postgrey ignore file, but postgrey first attempt is listed in logcheck report $ dpkg -l postgrey ii postgrey 1.18-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-C3EZRA Locale: LANG=it_IT,
2005 May 19
3
Bug#309772: please add ignore lines for autossh
Package: logcheck-database Severity: wishlist Hi! if autossh debug is enabled it logs to syslog, thus the messages go thru logcheck, messages are in this form May 19 14:02:55 sagara autossh[1909]: port set to 0, monitoring disabled so this is the ignore line ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ autossh\[[0-9]+\]: .*$ thanks, filippo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment
2006 Feb 22
2
Bug#353962: integrate courier file in logcheck-database
Package: courier-imap-ssl,logcheck-database Severity: wishlist Please move /etc/logcheck/*/courier to the courier packages and out of logcheck-database. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers stable APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked
2005 Feb 05
1
Missing/Wrong ignore.d for pureftp
Dear logcheck Team, sorry for choosing the direct contact I don't know if it's the correct way. I am using logcheck on a webserver where pureftp is installed for upload of content. Logcheck is working fine except for one ignore.d rule regarding the logout messages from pureftp. Logcheck is reporting lots (an I mean lots) of messages from the following type: Feb 5 06:02:45 web1
2006 Feb 11
1
Bug#352337: please tighten permissions on /etc/logcheck
Package: logcheck Severity: wishlist I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers stable APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686)
2000 Jun 23
1
Security Update: wu-ftpd vulnerability
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ______________________________________________________________________________ Caldera Systems, Inc. Security Advisory Subject: wu-ftpd vulnerability Advisory number: CSSA-2000-020.0 Issue date: 2000 June, 23 Cross reference: ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Problem Description There is
2005 Apr 28
1
Bug#306695: nagios: logcheck lines, please
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 22:10 -0400, Steve Gran wrote: > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ nagios: EXTERNAL COMMAND: PROCESS_SERVICE_CHECK_RESULT > > (although that may be too broad) Can you provide the log messages that this matches? Thanks, -- -jamie <jamie at silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam at silverdream.org w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms at silverdream.org pgp
2004 Dec 01
3
need help with wu-ftpd
Hi! I'm kind new to linux, I just got my server with CentOS 3.1 installed I'm trying to install a ftp server to upload files, but the wu-ftpd 2.6.2 doesn't work with autoconfigure nor with ./build lnx ./build install got error missing bin/ftpd can you tell me step by step howto install o should I user another ftp server... thanks for your help Fernando
2004 Nov 21
2
Bug#282378: logcheck-database: messages from USB joystick use
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.31 Severity: wishlist The following is reported by logcheck when inserting a USB joystick for the first time (workstation), none of which (I assume) I need to be informed of. Nov 21 17:50:08 localhost kernel: ohci_hcd 0000:00:01.2: wakeup Nov 21 17:50:08 localhost kernel: usb 1-1: new low speed USB device using address 2 Nov 21 17:50:10 localhost kernel:
2005 Apr 29
3
Bug#303661: logcheck: More openntpd improvements
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.39 Followup-For: Bug #303661 Attached is another entry that suppresses the adjustment messages -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7-grsec Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages logcheck depends on: ii
2006 Oct 09
3
ftpd that supports LDAP?
I did try that, but had difficulties in compiling it from source-- it's not in the yum repositories (either CentOS or Dag Wieers). -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler at chapman.edu Ethernet, n. What one uses to catch the Etherbunny. -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of
2005 Feb 20
1
Rename violations.ignore.d/logcheck-pureftp
<nitpickyness> To avoid possible confusion, shouldn't this be named logcheck-pureftpd, or logcheck-pure-ftpd (instead of logcheck-pureftp)? Or is there a reason (that I've missed) it's this way? </nitpickyness> -j -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This
2006 Feb 09
1
Processed: Re: Bug#352043: dovecot-imapd: logcheck rules miss some lines
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 352043 logcheck Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package Bug reassigned from package `dovecot-common' to `logcheck'. > retitle 352043 Please provide a backport of logcheck Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package Changed Bug title. >