similar to: [nut-commits] svn commit r2853 - in branches/windows_port: drivers include

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "[nut-commits] svn commit r2853 - in branches/windows_port: drivers include"

2012 May 03
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r3554 - branches/windows_port/common
c'est quoi cette chelouzerie ? je parle de l'ajout du sizeof(DWORD)... et ce que ce serait pas un str*n*cpy ou s*n*printf la vraie solution ? Arno 2012/5/3 Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > Author: fbohe-guest > Date: Thu May ?3 08:31:38 2012 > New Revision: 3554 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3554 > > Log: >
2011 Jan 18
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r2839 - branches/windows_port/scripts/Windows
Citeren Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > --- branches/windows_port/scripts/Windows/wininit.c Tue Jan 18 > 08:57:03 2011 (r2838) > +++ branches/windows_port/scripts/Windows/wininit.c Tue Jan 18 > 10:05:01 2011 (r2839) > @@ -285,8 +285,11 @@ > char fn[SMALLBUF]; > FILE *nutf; > char buf[SMALLBUF]; > + const char * conf_path; > > -
2010 Nov 28
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r2705 - branches/windows_port/drivers
Citeren Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > Author: fbohe-guest > Date: Fri Nov 26 14:01:35 2010 > New Revision: 2705 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2705 > > Log: > Add regex library for drivers (by Arnaud Quette) > > Modified: > branches/windows_port/drivers/Makefile.am Why is this needed? The value of
2011 Mar 17
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r2940 - in branches/windows_port/scripts/Windows/Installer
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest at alioth.debian.org> > To: nut-commits at lists.alioth.debian.org > Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:57:09 +0000 > Subject: svn commit r2940 - in > branches/windows_port/scripts/Windows/Installer: . ImageFiles > ImageFiles/Binary ImageFiles/Others ImageFiles/emptyDir >
2010 Oct 20
4
cross-compiling the windows_port branch (socklen_t)
Fr?d?ric, I'm curious as to how you are configuring the windows_port branch. When I try to cross-compile, configure complains about socklen_t: $ ./configure --host=i686-pc-mingw32 Network UPS Tools version 2.4.3 [...] checking for socklen_t... no checking for socklen_t equivalent... configure: error: Cannot find a type to use in place of socklen_t The test (m4/nut_type_socklen_t.m4) is
2010 Dec 11
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r2726 - in branches/windows_port: common drivers include
Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev op gmail.com>: > Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:01:14 +0000 > Subject: svn commit r2726 - in branches/windows_port: common drivers include > Author: fbohe-guest > Date: Thu Dec 9 14:01:07 2010 > New Revision: 2726 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2726 > > Log: > More work on serial drivers. > Still
2010 Nov 28
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r2704 - in branches/windows_port: . common drivers include scripts scripts/Windows server
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:28:47 +0000 > Subject: svn commit r2704 - in branches/windows_port: . common > drivers include scripts scripts/Windows server > Author: fbohe-guest > Date: Fri Nov 26 13:28:46 2010 > New Revision: 2704 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2704 > > Log: > Change the "full services" approach to a more POSIX
2012 Jan 11
0
Missing files on windows_port branch
I think this trunk-to-branch interior merge should be clean, but the merge logic correctly identifies some missing files in the reposurgeon output (checked in -pre7 and -pre4). They are in SVN on that branch, though (ignoring .gitignore for the time being). I only see one java file in scripts/java/jNut/src/main/java/org/networkupstools/jnut/ from reposurgeon.
2011 May 24
2
Merging windows_port branch
Hello, As you may have noticed, a first running version of nut for Windows has been released some time ago. In order to validate the possibility to merge the windows_port branch to the trunk, I have produced a patch file using the "svn diff" command. This patch couldn't be applied directly and the use of a merging tool is still needed. It is only intended to be reviewed so that we
2011 Jan 26
0
[nut-commits] svn commit r2854 - branches/windows_port/common
Citeren Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > - res = w32_serial_read(fd,buf,buflen,timeout); > + res = w32_serial_read((serial_handler_t *)fd,buf,buflen,timeout); Rather than casting away the const (which may not be possible with certain strict compiler flags), it is better to modify the prototype and definition of this function to take a 'const
2011 Mar 18
0
[nut-commits] svn commit r2946 - in branches/windows_port/scripts/Windows/Installer: . ImageFiles/Others
Citeren Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > +REM copy DLL files from system > +copy /Y c:\mingw\msys\1.0\bin\msys-1.0.dll .\ImageFiles\Others > +copy /Y c:\mingw\msys\1.0\bin\msys-crypto-1.0.0.dll .\ImageFiles\Others > +copy /Y c:\mingw\msys\1.0\bin\msys-ssl-1.0.0.dll .\ImageFiles\Others > +copy /Y c:\mingw\bin\libgnurx-0.dll .\ImageFiles\Others How can we be
2013 Oct 17
0
UPSC based Windows Client
[Please remember to copy the list.] On Oct 15, 2013, at 8:45 AM, eric kreuwels wrote: > Hi Charles > > Thanks for your answer. Good questions/suggestions. I copied both the WinUPSC and the installer project on my GDRIVE and shared it with you: > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0mSjYYj84-6ZGM4MWZfMnFxbUU/edit?usp=sharing > > Archiving WinUPSC in the NUT GitHub would be my
2014 Jan 15
3
Reviving the Windows port of NUT
Emilien, just saw your commit in Buildbot for testing some Windows changes. That's great that someone is working on this again! We have had a few users ask for updates to the 2.6.5+ version of NUT for Windows. The problem is that we do not have a good branch in Git to work from. The windows_port branch got rebased, but since it has merge commits, it is a bit of a mess. I apologize for
2011 Jan 19
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r2845 - branches/windows_port/common
On mar., 2011-01-18 at 19:52 +0000, Arjen de Korte wrote: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Tue Jan 18 19:52:02 2011 > New Revision: 2845 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2845 > > Log: > Prefer to use static variables locally over global variables (to prevent namespace conflicts) > > Modified: > branches/windows_port/common/common.c
2014 Jan 15
0
Reviving the Windows port of NUT
2014/1/15 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > Emilien, > > just saw your commit in Buildbot for testing some Windows changes. That's great that someone is working on this again! > We have had a few users ask for updates to the 2.6.5+ version of NUT for Windows. I am just fixing some bugs and implementing some minor windows-specific features. > The problem is that
2011 Jan 26
2
Minor issues cross-compiling windows_port branch
Hi, No patches today, sorry, just three little observations (i'm compiling windows_port branch on Debian GNU/Linux testing with mingw): * missing but required by the configure scripts/augeas/nutupsconf.aug.in scripts/hal/ups-nut-device.fdi.in scripts/udev/nut-usbups.rules.in * it autodetects hal and udev support but (of course) fails to cross-compile it (so i had to use
2013 Oct 14
3
UPSC based Windows Client
[attachments trimmed] Begin forwarded message: > From: eric kreuwels > Subject: UPSC based Windows Client > Date: October 13, 2013 4:43:31 PM EDT > To: nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org > > > Dear developers > > Last month I wrote WinUPSC, a Windows task tray UPS monitor. WinUPSC re-uses the UPSC logic to poll the UPS. > This initial version was tested
2011 Jan 28
1
ssl-nss-port branch does not compile on Ubuntu (asciidoc)
It looks like there was an issue with the AsciiDoc merge from the trunk: http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/private/nut/builders/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/builds/119/steps/compile/logs/stdio As mentioned in the email about windows_port, I would recommend testing the branch after a merge from the trunk. You can either run "make distcheck", or contact me (off-list) to set up a password so
2014 Jan 16
1
Reviving the Windows port of NUT
On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Emilien KIA wrote: > 2014/1/15 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: >> Emilien, >> >> just saw your commit in Buildbot for testing some Windows changes. That's great that someone is working on this again! >> We have had a few users ask for updates to the 2.6.5+ version of NUT for Windows. > > I am just fixing some bugs
2010 Nov 04
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r2600 - in trunk: . clients common docs m4 server
On mer., 2010-10-20 at 20:45 +0000, Arjen de Korte wrote: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Wed Oct 20 20:45:01 2010 > New Revision: 2600 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2600 > > Log: > Remove code that used the (now obsoleted) gethostbyaddr in favor of the (IPv6 capable) getaddrinfo function Arjen, I am trying to merge the windows_port branch