similar to: program "nutupsdrv"

Hi Helmut, Thank you for your mail. The distribution is Debian linux 7.9. I am talking of a fresh installation, and of course of it's update after. Thank you for helping. Regards Le 19 avr. 2016 06:08, "Helmut Hullen" <Hullen at t-online.de> a écrit : > Hallo, Jules, > > Du meintest am 18.04.16: > > > Is it recommended to install the tarball or archive

Is that with an active directory domain controller? On Apr 3, 2016 11:21 PM, "barış tombul" <bbtombul at gmail.com> wrote: > my conf win10 no problem: > client NTLMv2 auth = Yes > client lanman auth = No > server max protocol = SMB3_11 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = SMB3_11 > client min protocol = CORE > >

Thank you for the responses! Hi Helmut, I actually prefer moving into a newer version that has all the great new features, but due to policies inside our firm it will be a long process. I find the idea of modifying the new version Samba to start up like the old version. Very crafty! :) Hi Volker, yes we do have a support contract with Red Hat and Oracle. The version we are currently using is

On 04/19/2016 1:44 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Dale, > > Du meintest am 19.04.16: > >>> Found some more info: >>> >>> mount.cifs to mount shares from my DCs (samba 4.2.11) works >>> mount.cifs to mount shares from smbserver (also 4.2.11) does NOT >>> work. > [...] > >>> As for smb.conf options: similar on the DCs and the

On 05/19/2016 11:09 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, ToddAndMargo, > > Du meintest am 19.05.16: > >>>>>> Is there anything in Samba that will help protect >>>>>> against ransomware? > > [...] > >>> months ago there where ransomware which discovered shares without a >>> drive letter assigend > >> yes, I just read

Hello Helmut, thank you for your feedback. I think that i am not making my self clear enough. Independant of the distribution, is it recommended to install Samba4 tar ball version in a production environment, or sernet package ? I know that with sernet you can have benefit of support, so it may be an advantage. But what about if i choose to install code source version downloaded from

Helmut, Thanks. Yes, the Windows 7 clients are able to connect, and we don't have any 8/8.1 clients. Regards, Steve -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Helmut Hullen Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 11:17 AM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Windows 10 compatibility? Hallo, Harkins,, Du meintest am 04.05.16: >

On 26.06.2013 06:38, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Matt, > > Du meintest am 25.06.13: > >>> Not really... let's just document "make bios". > >> There's preliminary documentation in doc/building.txt. > > And "make bios" has run without any problem on my machine. ? CFLAGS=-Werror make bios ? /tmp/syslinux-6.01-pre1/core/bios.c: In

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 05:12:00AM +0200, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Dag, > Du meintest am 04.07.12: > > > I tried to package 5.00-pre6 on RHEL using the known routine: > > > make clean > > make installer > > make install-all > > > and I get: > > [...] > > Perhaps you try Matt Flemings 5.00-pre8 version: > >

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > Date sent: 06 Oct 2012 10:37:00 +0200 > From: Hullen at t-online.de (Helmut Hullen) > To: syslinux at zytor.com > Organization: Hullen BS > Subject: [syslinux] Error 0400 > Send reply to: helmut at hullen.de, >

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Helmut Hullen <Hullen at t-online.de> wrote: > Hallo, ToddAndMargo, > > Du meintest am 15.05.16: > >> Is there anything in Samba that will help protect >> against ransomware? > > The linux principle is "one job - one tool". Antivirus software exists. > It doesn't help against really new malware, it doesn't

Hi, I have the same problem as Helmut with INCLUDE keyword and extlinux 5.10 an later. The following configuration has been tested and worked with extlinux 4.05, 4.06, 5.01 Contents of "boot_label" file DEFAULT 1 --------------------------------------- Contents of "extlinux.conf" file # Enable menu.c32 UI menu.c32 # Disable the boot: prompt PROMPT 0 # 5 sec TIMEOUT 50 #

On 04/19/2016 3:49 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Dale, > > Du meintest am 19.04.16: > >>>>> As for smb.conf options: similar on the DCs and the smbserver, >>>>> with: >>>>> >>>>> server signing = mandatory >>>>> ntlm auth = yes >>>>> server min protocol = SMB2 >>>>> client max

On Wed, 26 Jun, at 06:30:00PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, H. Peter, > > Du meintest am 25.06.13: > > >> We could probably fabricate a script of some sort to check for the > >> required version of gnu-efi, and skip it if not found, unless the > >> user explicitly requested that the EFI files be built, in which case > >> we'd error out. >

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Du meintest am 25.06.13: > >>> We could probably fabricate a script of some sort to check for the >>> required version of gnu-efi, and skip it if not found, unless the >>> user explicitly requested that the EFI files be built, in which case >>> we'd error out. >>> >>> Thoughts? >

Hallo, I've just tried to compile Samba 4.0.0alpha14 under Slackware 13-current - it failed. 206 warnings, 257 errors, and last famous words ---------------- cite on --------------- [2152/2374] Linking default/source4/heimdal_build/libroken-samba4.so [2153/2374] Linking default/source4/heimdal_build/libasn1-samba4.so /lib/libcom_err.a(error_message.o): In function `et_list_unlock':

Hallo, Luke, Du meintest am 02.04.16: > Also, when I run testparm -svv | less I can find these four lines on > both the working and non-working servers: > server max protocol = SMB3 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = NT1 > client min protocol = CORE Perhaps a max protocol = NT1 in the global section helps. And

could it be possible to code in a time out. so I can set say user kirsty can login once in a 24 or 12 hour period. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Re-2: [Samba] limit login (05-Sep-2007 14:17) From: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE To: damiend@mckennagroup.co.uk > On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:38:00PM +0200, Helmut Hullen wrote: > > > You are aware that once someone

On Mon, 24 Jun, at 06:27:00PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > In file included from /tmp/syslinux-6.00/efi/mem.c:3:0: > /tmp/syslinux-6.00/efi/efi.h:33:5: error: unknown type name 'EFI_SERVICE_BINDING' [...] > Where is the problem: on the syslinux side or on the slackware side? Or > somewhere else? You need a newer version of gnu-efi, gnu-efi 3.0u, which is the release

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Helmut Hullen <Hullen at t-online.de> wrote: > I don't have the ia64 files which are needed for a complete binary. But > maybe that's only my special problem. IA64 is Itanium. I'd guess you mean x64/x86-64. I think it may also go under the label "IA32-64". -- -Gene