similar to: nut_check_os.m4

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "nut_check_os.m4"

2004 Jun 16
4
Status-info 1: Signalling C7 / SS7
Hi, one month ago, I announced, that I will look at the openss7 project in order to use it together with asterisk. It took a while for me to check the capabilities of and around the project. Since the openss7 project consists of only one person, and when there was just silence for a long time in the project's mailing list, I doubted, whether it was a good idea to consider using openss7. In
2003 Apr 22
5
SS7
Hi, Does Asterisk support SS7? Google shows an old new post from Feb. 2002 stating that OpenSS7 would help add SS7 support to Asterisk, but presently OpenSS7 seems to be dead and I can't seem to find anything about it at Asterisk or Digium's sites. What happened? -- Regards, Tais M. Hansen ComX
2004 Sep 17
4
SS7 E1 cards
Hi, I'm looking into support for SS7 and I found an article (http://www.openss7.com/news13022002.html) which says that OpenSS7 supports Linux Support Inc's T400P-SS7 Quad T1 and E400P-SS7 Quad E1 PCI interface cards. It also says that Linux Support Inc is the primary sponsor of Asterisk. However I cannot find these cards on the Asterisk hardware page
2005 Feb 24
4
What is an E400P-SS7??
Hi, Is this card the same as the T410P, after all, it's made by Digium. There's one prior reference on the mailint list[1] but it didn't answer the question. There was also an SS7 status report[2] last June but it's doesn't seem to have lead anywhere either. There was post saying an SS7 release was immenent last September[3], but then silence. Any info anyone would like to
2004 Jun 21
1
OpenSS7 T400P-SS7 and Digium T400P
Hi, I've posted this question on OpenSS7 mailing list but I didn't get a clear answer. I have a system running asterisk using Digium T400P card. Can this same card be used with OpenSS7 project to carry SS7 links? Is there any difference between these two cards? -- Matteo D'Amato Network/Telecom Administrator Intelco Communication Inc
2007 May 25
2
TDM bus extension.
In reference to an old post from 2002: http://www.marko.net/asterisk/archives/0203/0103.html How does one go about doing this? Also, what is the present status of the OpenSS7 stack in Asterisk? What can it do now? And is there any possibility in the future of developing a DS3 card for it, if only for the purpose of mostly DACSing? Which is still a level of intelligent call control on the
2004 Jan 17
3
SS7 over Asterisk ?
Hello.. I have a customer who wants to connect 2 PBX's over IP.. The setup should look like this: [PBX] <-- SS7 --> [Asterisk] <-- IAX --> [Asterisk] <-- SS7 --> [PBX] Since there are no SS7 cards , I was thinking at a way of carrying the E1 data as bulk...Can I do that ? How ? Is possible a scenario like this ? I'm thinking of IAX because I don't
2004 Jun 25
1
SS7 status report 2
Hi, there are still some questions to be answered by OpenSS7.com in order to decide, whether E400P-SS7 is a good choice for the asterisk SS7 support. In the meanwhile I'm also in negotiations with another manufacturer (whose name I currently may not tell due to a NDA) of SS7 hardware, who gets likely persuaded to offer a cheap SS7-PCI-card which would be suitable for asterisk. Asterisk users
2004 Nov 16
10
SS7 for *
Hi all, Does somebody know what's new with SS7 and * ? I'm very interested. Is it ready ? I'm prepared to pay if necessary. Thanks, Angel.
2008 Jul 17
0
r1515 - branches/trunk-make-package: anybody interested in taking over?
Hi, I've taken a small bit of time to initiate this work. There is now: - an m4 macro to detect the system (linux only ATM, but simple to complete) - a set of "make package" targets throughout the tree (limited to debian ATM) The remaining tasks on this specific point are: - m4 macro completion to handle all the supported platforms (at least the ones that have files in the
2004 May 25
1
SS7 links
Has anyone tried to get dialogic ss7 trunking to work with Asterisk? I did some googling but nothing helpful turned up... Could a person get an intel dialogic and get * to see it like a zap channel? And use it for incoming and outgoing trunk access? -- respectfully, Joseph ------=============
2004 Jun 25
9
SS7 to Pri
Does anyone know of a device that will take an SS7 link and convert it to a PRI? -- respectfully, Joseph - (606) 477-2355 x140 ------=============
2007 Dec 06
1
Help with /usr/share/sendmail-cf/m4/proto.m4 - fax macro
OK. Digging into this... sendmail.m4 has the lines: define(`FAX_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/bin/faxmail')dnl define(`FAX_MAILER_ARGS',`faxmail -d -n -p 12pt $u@$h $f')dnl MAILER(`fax')dnl proto.m4 has: `R$+ < @ $+ .FAX. > $#fax $@ $2 $: $1 user at host.FAX', `ifdef(`FAX_RELAY', `R$*<@$+.FAX.>$* $:
2007 Oct 30
0
m4/as-compiler-flag.m4
m4/as-compiler-flag.m4 | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit 59003aea7d25c962c3332db28222b4241f68fdda Author: Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org> Date: Tue Oct 30 10:40:04 2007 +0100 make second and third arguments to AS_COMPILER_FLAG optional diff --git a/m4/as-compiler-flag.m4 b/m4/as-compiler-flag.m4 index f706196..76cf4cd 100644 ---
2009 Dec 15
1
patch for m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4
It looks like the change to m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4 in r1968 broke the test on at least Solaris 10. Here is one possible fix. ---------------------------- --- m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4.old 2009-12-15 09:30:48.000000000 -0800 +++ m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4 2009-12-15 11:12:15.291295000 -0800 @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ if test -z "${nut_have_libnetsnmp_seen}"; then
2016 Mar 30
2
[Bug 11813] New: m4/socklen_t.m4 uses obsolete AC_TRY_COMPILE macro
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11813 Bug ID: 11813 Summary: m4/socklen_t.m4 uses obsolete AC_TRY_COMPILE macro Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org
2008 May 01
1
ogg.m4 in vorbis/m4 ?
Hi, I've (just now) been playing with a buildbot, building ogg, vorbis, speex, and theora, using a non-standard prefix on a pretty bare debian image. I noticed that vorbis was failing during configure while theora wasn't. I tracked it down to the location of ogg.m4. There is a copy of ogg.m4 in theora/m4, but there is not one in vorbis/m4. This means that if you have libogg installed
2001 Aug 19
1
ogg.m4 and vorbis.m4
Greetings everyone. I have 2 quick questions about ao/ao.m4, ogg/ogg.m4, and vorbis/vorbis.m4. 1. Is there any reason that the macros are named AM_PATH_AO, AM_PATH_OGG, and AM_PATH_VORBIS? Can we change them to something else? I ran into a problem when trying to add support for ogg/vorbis into a package today: Automake assumes that anything beginning with AM_ belongs to automake -- these two
2008 Mar 10
0
[PATCH] fix aclocal/autoconf/automake m4 directory reference
Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe at gentoo.org> --- Makefile.am | 2 +- configure.ac | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fee51bc27d60c7ec9d0371af88a476a232d9a8bd.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 761 bytes Desc: not available Url :
2004 Sep 23
2
libtool.m4
It seems that autogen.sh failed when I tried to build theora from svn because it could not find libtool.m4. With Mandrake 10.0, I have libtool.m4 in /usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 Where is it supposed to be? Regards, John