similar to: Tr : adding Jageson Technology JASUNY UPS support to NUT

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches similar to: "Tr : adding Jageson Technology JASUNY UPS support to NUT"

2008 Mar 14
0
Sola 305 with INT-0051 cable
Hello again, I have a Sola 305 (aka Powerware 3110) here connected via a serial INT-0051 cable which I am trying to get working with nut. The driver.list file indicates that nut supports the Sola 305 when connected via the INT-0025C cable using the genericups driver with upstype set to 7 but it does not mention the INT-0051. I was able to use the "Basic CheckUPS II" utility provided
2005 Oct 03
1
CyberPower SL-series
This code, added to drivers/genericups.h, supports the CyberPower SL series UPSes. I've tested with my 725SL - the online/on battery transition, and low battery status, and finally the shutdown signal all work as expected. *** genericups.h.orig Sun Nov 2 16:54:24 2003 --- genericups.h Mon Oct 3 13:49:00 2005 *************** *** 220,225 **** --- 220,234 ---- TIOCM_ST
2006 Aug 07
2
Select Box Question
Hi, Yet another newbie here... I''m writing an appliction in Rails, and I''ve Ajaxified my select boxes so they update dynamically. I used the "observe_field" method to monitor changes to my select box. I find that it''s kind of erratic... it updates constantly and makes the selection for me, based on where my mouse happens to be hovering when it does its
2009 Aug 14
2
Bestfortress driver, network serial patch for nut-2.0
Best fortress support was understandably dropped, but we still use them, and someone else may want the driver I ported to nut-2.0. We also often attach the serial cable from a UPS to a network terminal server, since servers these days don't come with very many serial ports. (They call them "legacy" ports.) I submitted a patch to support these for nut-1.x, and it was rejected
2012 Feb 26
1
Server Does Not Shut Down
Hello, I have a UPS connected to my server with the following: Server is Suse 10.1 Nut version is?Network UPS Tools - Generic UPS driver 1.32 (2.0.4) I installed this around 2005 and cannot remember how I installed the software. ups.conf: [sdrups] driver = genericups port = /dev/ttyS0 desc = "For Server & Backup" upstype = 9 upsd.conf: ACL all 0.0.0.0/0 ACL localhost
2007 Dec 06
7
[PATCH] Fix ioemu compile
# HG changeset patch # User john.levon@sun.com # Date 1196969481 28800 # Node ID 2c28ac4db1f7542220b1472821e8631b79b6a23a # Parent 4a98d4b6e4daccd610175e3c0f8cab49b056c649 Fix ioemu compile serial.c was including another Linux-specific header. Signed-off-by: John Levon <john.levon@sun.com> diff --git a/tools/ioemu/hw/serial.c b/tools/ioemu/hw/serial.c --- a/tools/ioemu/hw/serial.c +++
2006 Jan 31
2
Bug #302338 (genericups: custom configurationthrough ups.conf, not working)
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Arjen de Korte wrote: > > But I'd like to know what I'm testing. Could you please post a bug tracker > > URL? I'm having trouble finding #302338. > > That may be because I closed the bug (maybe a little overenthousiastic). See > > http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=302338&group_id=30602&atid=411542 >
2006 Jul 11
1
Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r446 - in branches/Testing: . drivers man
> +22 = Gamatronic UPSs with alarm interface > + [CP=RTS] [OL=CTS] [LB=\-DCD] [SD=DTR] > + > +22 = CyberPower SL seriess > + [CP=RTS] [OL=CTS] [LB=\-CAR] [SD=DTR] > + > + This part of the patch is no good. While TIOCM_CAR is equivalent to TIOCM_CD (at least in some implementations) CAR certainly isn't handled the same as DCD by genericups. It won't be
2008 Dec 10
0
No subject
will be used by Nut's powercom driver. I've failed to google anything about this UPS working with Linux. > > What does 'lsusb -d 0d9f:0002' say for this device? Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0d9f:0002 Powercom Co., Ltd The current progress is like this: With help from linux-hotplug guys (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.hotplug.devel/13551) I've managed to /dev/ttyUSB0 to
2007 Jun 18
1
Megatec - modem control lines
Carlos, Today I was browsing through the NUT Tracker and noticed an entry which linked to a message on nut-upsdev: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2006-January/000559.html Although the fentonups driver is no longer in the tree (since it was replaced by the megatec driver), I think there is still some merit in this patch. Notice the following lines from this message: >
2006 Jul 04
13
NewBie question
Hi, I m very new to Ruby. I bought a book "Ruby on Rails" and I think I understand some concepts. My question is : Is there a way to not use "Cookies" or "Sessions Variables" to keep some information about the user. I ask this question because I would like to prevent some cases where the user browser won''t accept cookies. I m from Asp 3.0, and I