similar to: SVN display patch

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "SVN display patch"

2008 Nov 19
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r1556 - in trunk: . docs drivers scripts/hal scripts/hotplug scripts/udev tools
Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>: > Author: aquette > Date: Sat Nov 15 21:50:40 2008 > New Revision: 1556 > > Log: > USB "improved maintenance" code. Refer to docs/new-drivers.txt for > more information... > > Added: > trunk/drivers/usb-common.c > trunk/drivers/usb-common.h > trunk/tools/ > trunk/tools/Makefile.am >
2007 Oct 03
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r1136 - in trunk: . drivers
> Author: agordeev-guest > Date: Wed Oct 3 00:09:21 2007 > New Revision: 1136 > > Log: > - drivers/megatec_usb.c: added ability to do subdriver-specific > initialization, and moved some shared code to agiler init function > since krauler doesn't need it. [...] I'm not very thrilled about this patch: 1) Down at the subdriver level, one shouldn't use
2010 Nov 24
2
dovecot is confused about mail_location
IMAP logins via fetchmail are failing on my mailserver root at grelber:/home/esr# tail -f /var/log/mail.err Nov 24 16:56:48 grelber dovecot: IMAP(cathy): mail_location not set and autodetection failed: Mail storage autodetection failed with home=/home/cathy Nov 24 16:56:48 grelber dovecot: IMAP(cathy): Fatal: Namespace initialization failed Nov 24 16:57:39 grelber dovecot: IMAP(cathy):
2007 May 17
3
Belkin USB UPSes
I just bought a pair of Belkin USB UPSes -- F6C1200-UNV and F6C550-AVR -- and installed the latest version of nut under Ubuntu 7.04. I'm using the F6C1200-UNV. My system does see the device; dmesg says [ 82.718428] usb 2-2: new low speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2 [ 82.941189] usb 2-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 83.036825] usbcore: registered new driver
2007 May 17
3
Belkin USB UPSes
I just bought a pair of Belkin USB UPSes -- F6C1200-UNV and F6C550-AVR -- and installed the latest version of nut under Ubuntu 7.04. I'm using the F6C1200-UNV. My system does see the device; dmesg says [ 82.718428] usb 2-2: new low speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2 [ 82.941189] usb 2-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 83.036825] usbcore: registered new driver
2008 Nov 16
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r1560 - trunk
Citeren Arjen de Korte <adkorte-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Sun Nov 16 13:00:30 2008 > New Revision: 1560 > > Log: > Generated by libtool and should not be versioned. > > Modified: > trunk/ (props changed) Right, that didn't work out quite the way I intended. Can someone please set the svn:ignore property on
2010 Nov 28
3
[nut-commits] svn commit r2708 - in branches/ssl-nss-port: clients m4 server
Citeren Arjen de Korte <adkorte-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > Log: > Use the 'nss_compat_ossl' compatibility layer to use the Mozilla NSS > library instead of OpenSSL (we might want to include native support > in the future, but this will at least allow a quick migration for > testing purposes) I don't recall that we ever discussed the possibility of
2009 Jan 15
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r1728 - trunk/tools
Citeren Arjen de Korte <adkorte-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Thu Jan 15 11:54:05 2009 > New Revision: 1728 > > Log: > Another stab at this. > > Modified: > trunk/tools/Makefile.am And failing miserably... :-( Can someone more fluent in 'autotoolish' fix this problem? Currently the BuildBot is broken by update r1718
2010 Dec 12
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r2731 - in trunk/docs: . man website website/scripts
Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette op alioth.debian.org>: > Author: aquette > Date: Sat Dec 11 12:31:21 2010 > New Revision: 2731 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2731 > > Log: > Complete the list of Subversion ignored files, with AsciiDoc > generated contents (no functional changes) Is there a particular reason for having both the man/
2008 Nov 16
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r1557 - trunk
Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>: > Author: aquette > Date: Sat Nov 15 22:47:26 2008 > New Revision: 1557 > > Log: > GNU libtool update > > Modified: > trunk/ChangeLog > trunk/configure.in > trunk/ltmain.sh I think 'ltmain.sh' is a generated file (at least, I hope it is), this change severely broke compilation here. I had to
2007 Jun 26
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r988 - in trunk: . docs
> Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Mon Jun 25 19:26:09 2007 > New Revision: 988 > > Log: > Update to reflect changes in the way we deal with dstate_dataok() and > dstate_datastale(). > > Historically it was needed to call dstate_dataok() regularly, to prevent > staleness warnings. This is no longer needed, now the server will PING > drivers it has not heard of
2007 Jun 18
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r964 - in trunk: . drivers
Arjen de Korte wrote: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Mon Jun 18 09:03:18 2007 > New Revision: 964 > > Log: > additional debug info in case commands fail > > Modified: > trunk/ChangeLog > trunk/drivers/megatec.c > > Modified: trunk/ChangeLog Arnaud, Carlos, I'd like to backport this change to Testing as well. Intermittent startup problems for
2010 Jan 23
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r2260 - trunk/drivers
Citeren Arjen de Korte <adkorte-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Sat Jan 23 10:06:51 2010 > New Revision: 2260 > > Log: > Need to define _XOPEN_SOURCE for strptime() prototype in glibc2 > > Modified: > ? ? trunk/drivers/mge-hid.c Arnaud, Apparently this solves the problem for the strptime() function, but now breaks the snprintf()
2009 Jan 15
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r1734 - in trunk/scripts: hal hotplug udev
Citeren Arjen de Korte <adkorte-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Thu Jan 15 20:02:22 2009 > New Revision: 1734 > > Log: > Freshly generated USB helper files > > Modified: > trunk/scripts/hal/ups-nut-device.fdi.in > trunk/scripts/hotplug/libhid.usermap > trunk/scripts/udev/nut-usbups.rules.in Questions is, should we try
2010 Oct 25
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r2610 - branches/silent_build
Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette op alioth.debian.org>: > Log: > Optionaly enable silent build rules, using AM_SILENT_RULES, only if > it's supported (requires automake 1.11) Why do we need a new branch for this? As far as I can see, only the below lines are really needed > +dnl Currently, we only (force) enable silent rules if available > +dnl Verbose mode can be
2009 Mar 01
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r1800 - in trunk: . data drivers
Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette op alioth.debian.org>: > Modified: trunk/drivers/tripplite-hid.c > ============================================================================== > --- trunk/drivers/tripplite-hid.c (original) > +++ trunk/drivers/tripplite-hid.c Sun Mar 1 19:56:31 2009 > @@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ > > /* HP R/T 2200 INTL (like SMART2200RMXL2U) */ > {
2014 Jul 09
5
Documenting the NUT driver-qualification process
I think the time for me to get involved in NUT documentation has come again. Late last week I had to buy a UPS under time pressure. The Eaton unit that thus project gifted me with in 2006(?) died during a severe thunderstorm watch, so it was off to MicroCenter to get a replacement pronto. I wound up buying an APC BN700MC. It was what they had in the performance range I needed. The removable
2014 Jul 29
1
APC protocols and drivers (was: Documenting the NUT driver-qualification process)
Hi Ted there was a drift from the initial topic. worth a new thread! 2014-07-27 9:13 GMT+02:00 Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at mittelstaedt.us>: > On 7/26/2014 12:18 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > >> Hi Eric, >> >> sorry for the lag, summer time... >> >> I'm first seconding Charles comments >> >> 2014-07-09 12:31 GMT+02:00 Eric S. Raymond <esr
2009 May 18
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r1846 - in trunk: . clients common drivers include man server
Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette at alioth.debian.org>: > Author: aquette > Date: Mon May 18 12:14:54 2009 > New Revision: 1846 > > Log: > Enable timestamp on output messages (format "%H:%M:%S: msg") I think this should only be done for messages that are sent to stderr. In most cases, syslog will already prepend a timestamp, so this is probably redundant.
2007 Aug 13
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r1049 - in trunk: . drivers
Alexander Gordeev wrote: > Author: agordeev-guest > Date: Mon Aug 13 13:09:43 2007 > New Revision: 1049 > > Log: > drivers/megatec_usb.c: added credits to the banner message. Is this really needed/desirable? I think this kind of information needs to be put in the AUTHORS document. There are many more people on this list that put a lot of effort in NUT, without claiming credit