similar to: Default NUT PORT

With the Ipv6 patch (r708), I get: upsclient.c: In function `upscli_connect': upsclient.c:469: `AI_ADDRCONFIG' undeclared (first use in this function) upsclient.c:469: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once upsclient.c:469: for each function it appears in.) Even if it doesn't break IPv4 support, it may break portability, as IPv6 seems to require specific functions that are

On 1/13/07, Peter Selinger <selinger@mathstat.dal.ca> wrote: > > The question is when exactly this should be converted to a number. > > Should this be done in upscli_splitname() or in upscli_connect()? The > > latter would require a change in the prototypes of upscli_splitname() > > and upscli_connect(), and an attendant change in all the existing > > clients.

I want to use upsdebugx, upslogx in 'clients/upsclient.c', however this fails with the following error messages (I trimmed the path to the build directory to <path> in order to prevent line wrapping): <path>/clients/upsclient.c:941: undefined reference to `upsdebugx' <path>/clients/upsclient.c:910: undefined reference to `upslogx'

Hello, At 15:42 -0400 on 2014-6-1 Charles Lepple wrote: > > On May 24, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > >> Don't worry about the battery physical properties for now - the > >> problem there is that we don't have enough information from the UPS > >> to do a proper calculation. With the V_interval[] settings, you can > >> tweak

Hello, I was running upsmon some time without UPS connected and noticed significant memory leak. After some debugging I found the leak source. It is in file clients/upsclient.c. Function upscli_connect() allocates memory for ups->pc_ctx and in case of any error, just returns -1 without freeing it. My NUT version is 2.2.0, but I quickly looked through 2.2.1 sources and it seems this bug was not

On Jun 2, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: > Hello, > > At 15:42 -0400 on 2014-6-1 Charles Lepple wrote: >> >> On May 24, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: >> >>>> Don't worry about the battery physical properties for now - the >>>> problem there is that we don't have enough information from the UPS >>>> to do a

On May 24, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote: >> Don't worry about the battery physical properties for now - the >> problem there is that we don't have enough information from the UPS >> to do a proper calculation. With the V_interval[] settings, you can >> tweak the new state-of-charge calculation to match what you see via >> upsc when the battery is

Hello, I am currently working on the nut scanner. For detecting available upsd on the network, I rely on upscli_connect. The problem with this function is that it calls a blocking "connect" function. So the nut-scanner is blocked while waiting for the TCP timeout when trying to connect to an IP without upsd available . Since this timeout may be rather long (3 minutes on my host), I

Hi Arjen, in server/upsd.c r731, you moved the call conf_load() from after check_perms() (~ l.1020) to before setupsignals() (~ l.989). The problem is that conf_load() needs to open the ups driver socket, and it assumes that STATEPATH is the current working directory. The directory is only set in l.1016. Therefore, the first attempt to open a socket will always fail. From the user's point of

Great, thanks! Two questions: * what is a domain literal? Is this something like 192.168.0.1? In this case, the '[]' are probably unnecessary. * are you sure you want to use fprintf(stderr, ...) in a library? This doesn't seem like a good idea to me. Wouldn't it be more consistent to extend upscli_errlist[] ? -- Peter Arjen de Korte wrote: > > Author:

Hello, At 09:24 -0400 on 2014-5-23 Charles Lepple wrote: > > See attached. Still doesn't have the writable V_interval values, > but I probably won't have time to test that until later. Thank you for the patch. > Don't worry about the battery physical properties for now - the > problem there is that we don't have enough information from the UPS > to do a

Great, thanks Arjen! Now we need an autoconf test to set HAVE_IPV6 automatically. I will look into what functionality needs to be tested; the test can be refined as problems arise later. -- Peter Arjen de Korte wrote: > > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Sat Jan 6 19:39:08 2007 > New Revision: 710 > > Modified: > trunk/ChangeLog > trunk/clients/upsc.c >

Dear Sirs, First of all I would like to thank you for support PCM product in your project. Kindly please be informed that POWERCOM launch new USB-controller with productID 0X04. Updated USB-controller compatible with previous version which supported by your usbhid-ups driver. There is added some command and changed idProduct. Vendor ID stay the same 0X0d9f without changes. Detailed information

Hi all, on proposal by Arnaud Quette and sponsored by Eaton, I will work on a port on Java of client, discovery and config API. As I have already suggested (mail of 2011-06-14 of this ml), instead of developping another port of nut protocol, I suggest to develop a higher level API in C/C++ uppon existing upsclient, inspirated by existing C-based tools and python and perl rewrites. The second

Hi Charles, Yes, it looks like my g++ does contain STL library which might be just my specific case... However, as a temporary solution I disabled nutclient in Makefile (please find the file attached). And nut-2.7.3 can be compiled now. Thanks, Sergey On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Sergey Talchuk

Dear Sirs, We appreciate your support and cooperation. Can you please kindly add our new USB-controller with productID 0X04 to NUT compatible list. Updated USB-controller compatible with previous version which is supported by your usbhid-ups driver. Detailed information regarding new POWERCOM communication protocol you could download via link

Hi, I've been trying to get my new Tripplite OmniVS100 UPS (USB Connection) to work on my system. What I have is: Ubuntu 10.04 Server Nut 2.4.3 /etc/nut/ups.conf [omni] Driver = usbhid-ups Port = auto Desc = "My Server" /etc/nut/nut.conf MODE=standalone I followed the instructions at this link:

Citeren Alexander Gordeev <lasaine op lvk.cs.msu.su>: > I've received the units. Are there any special things I should test or > just the standard NUT setup? They should be detected out of the box (with the latest version from the trunk) through the 'usbhid-ups' driver. Note that I just added some additional commands to enable|disable|mute the beeper of the UPS.

Citeren Arjen de Korte <adkorte-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > Log: > Use the 'nss_compat_ossl' compatibility layer to use the Mozilla NSS > library instead of OpenSSL (we might want to include native support > in the future, but this will at least allow a quick migration for > testing purposes) I don't recall that we ever discussed the possibility of

Citeren Arjen de Korte <adkorte-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Thu Jan 15 11:54:05 2009 > New Revision: 1728 > > Log: > Another stab at this. > > Modified: > trunk/tools/Makefile.am And failing miserably... :-( Can someone more fluent in 'autotoolish' fix this problem? Currently the BuildBot is broken by update r1718