similar to: RFC: allow HID subdriver's to register ups.conf settings

j T wrote: > >- allow the value to be NULL if a subdriver does not require > > initialization. > > Am I right in thinking that this is simply a case of doing: > > subdriver_t some_subdriver = { > /* ... */ > some_format_serial, > NULL, > } > > Rather than: > > subdriver_t belkin_subdriver = { > /* ... */ >

Hi Alexander, thanks for your good work on the megatec_usb driver. I have made a few more (cosmetic) changes. Is the driver now working stably for your device? In particular, do the instant commands (and particularly "upsdrvctl -k") work properly? In this case, we could hopefully mark the device as "supported" and merge the driver to the main branch. There is still the

I got sick & tired of constant power outages with no warning, so when I saw various UPSes at the store, I decided to get one, and the one I got was a model 200897 from Newpoint (a.k.a. Power Sentry). A couple of days later the power went out and I decided to use the opportunity to hook up the UPS. I added up the wattages of the equipment I would be connecting, and found that the only way I

I get the following error on r809 (but it looks like the code change happened here). Does HIDDevice_t need to be defined/changed in one of the headers? if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../drivers -I../include -I../../include -DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE -I/usr/include/hal -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include -DINET6 -O2 -D_REENTRANT -DNETSNMP_USE_INLINE -Wall -Dlinux -I.

On 1/23/07, Henning Brauer <hb-nut@bsws.de> wrote: > good new first: the megatec driverin 2.0.5 now works with the Online > Xanto S3000R here - well, for the very basics. > > the UPS has NO way ofidentifying itself. It also does not respond to > the power ratings query ("F"). I previously used a hacked up fentonups > driver. This means the driver cannot figure out

hi list, im running debian/testing(act. squeeze) with 2.6.26-2-amd64 kernel. first tried apcupsd what flawlessly worked but because i run nagios (needs nut running for 'check_ups'), im trying to run nut. dmesg and syslog show the device: Jul 27 00:08:06 kate kernel: [16001.477941] hiddev96hidraw0: USB HID v1.10 Device [APC Back-UPS ES 700 FW:829.D3 .I USB FW:D3 ] on usb-0000:00:1d.1-1

Hello everyone! If this message was posted twice, my apologies. I'm having issues with my webmail today... I am using the testing version of NUT from SVN at changeset 582. I have successfully created a stub for newhidups driver for my Dynex DX-800U UPS, but I am completely lost on the customization of it. I've followed the hid-subdrivers.txt instructions and I understand I need to

Hi Jon, your patches are malformed because (presumably) your email client wrapped this lines. Could you please send these as a unified diff ("diff -u"), and send them in attachments, rather than as a copy-and-paste? Thanks, -- Peter Jon Gough wrote: > > Peter, > Here are the files I have worked on. I hope I have diff'd them > correctly. I have not touched the

Hello, all. Some time ago I bought myself a UPS which was advertised as USB-HID. It was a surprise to learn that while it definitely is recognized as USB device, the HID descriptor has no UPS pages at all. The only software it came with was a windows program written in visual basic. Trying to research this topic I found a reference to energizer USB ups driver and learned about variety of

I think having this logic buried within libhid/libusb (libusb:libusb_open(), line 179 to 206) is ultimately a mistake, albeit one that I am probably responsible for. Would it make sense to confine libhid to low-level operations, and leave the decision of trying to reopen vs. retrying to open to the high-level driver, in this case usbhid-ups? I envision that the code in usbhid-ups:reconnect_ups()

I just moved my UPS over from serial to USB and found that I needed to add it to the hotplug USB list to make things work. Belkin F6C120-UNV - Bus 002 Device 004: ID 050d:0912 Belkin Components It seems to be working OK on 2.0.4 with newhidups. Attached is a patch which I think should add the appropriate device id's in the right places to the trunk code. Jon -------------- next part