Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Network UPS Tools 2.4.3"
2008 Apr 30
2
openSUSE 11.0 - NUT
Stan,
I'm very pleased to see you back to work with us on enhancing nut in
that many areas ;-)
2008/4/30 Stanislav Brabec <sbrabec at suse.cz>:
> Stanislav Brabec wrote:
>
> > Please note that 2.2.2-pre3 installs hald addons by default to / on
> > openSUSE 11.0 beta 2 x86_64. Not a big problem.
>
> Here is a patch, which fixes openSUSE 11.0 beta 2 x86_64:
2009 Dec 28
4
Megatec driver floods logs #2 & mail notifications
Hi there!
I'm a n00b NUT user trying to get it running on RHEL5 and actually do
something useful for me. Few questions:
1) I want it to notify me by email on power loss and power back events.
I can't find any sample scripts for this purpose... Where shall I look
for them?
2) So far, I've backported the package from Fedora and got my Ablerex
running (previously used with Upsilon /
2007 Mar 06
3
make errors on solaris express dev 02/07
make fails at drivers:
make[1]: Entering directory `/export/home/zoly/Documents/trunk/drivers'
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -I../include -DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE -I/usr/include/hal -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/sfw/include -g -Dsolaris2 -I. -I/usr/sfw/include -O -Wall -Wsign-compare -o al175 al175.o ../common/libcommon.a ../common/upsconf.o
2005 Nov 08
1
adding libusb CFLAGS to generic-hid.c rule
Peter,
attached is a proposed patch to fix compilation of generic-hid.c when
libusb's usb.h is not in /usr/include (but the -I flag is provided by
"libusb-config --cflags"). It fixes the build under OS X, where Fink
installs libusb with --prefix=/sw.
I changed "usb.h" to <usb.h> so that 'make depend' wouldn't generate a
dependency on 'usb.h' with
2005 Sep 12
1
Re: Status of the PSE NUT patches (was: NUT patches)
[I'm switching my dev address to @gmail.com instead of @mgeups...
please, update your bookmark]
Peter Selinger wrote:
> > Arnaud Quette wrote:
> >
> > Here is the status of PSE (Peter Selinger) NUT patches
> > for newhidups (hidparser, apc support, ...).
> >
> > - nut-cvs-patch-REOPEN-2005-08-24:
> > approved and applied on Development tree
> >
2006 May 12
1
Fwd: RE New xanto driver for NUT
Dear Andreas,
some googling revealed, you created a driver for the xanto series of
online-usv.de. In what state it is currently?
I've to manage a S2000 and would like to use nut for it, is it usable by
now? Do you need another tester?
TIA,
Pete
2006 Jul 30
8
Gentoo Ultra USB UPS
Hi All
I'm trying to get my Ultra UPS connected. It connects using a standard
USB cable
I have --with-drivers=hidups in the configure command and I have lsusb
showing
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0d9f:0001 Powercom Co., Ltd
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
I have /dev/usb/hiddev0
now matter what I try I keep getting
upsdrvctl start
Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.0.3
Can't
2009 Dec 25
1
Downloads are not available
Hi guys!
I'm trying to get NUT into RPMForge and confusingly enough, it turns out
that the code downloads are not available from the official website:
http://new.networkupstools.org/download.html
[buildbot at servinet SOURCES]$ wget http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/nut-2.4.1.tar.gz
--2009-12-25 13:26:23-- http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/nut-2.4.1.tar.gz
Resolving
2008 Feb 02
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r1264 - in trunk: . drivers m4 scripts/hal
On Feb 1, 2008 6:11 PM, Arnaud Quette <aquette at alioth.debian.org> wrote:
> Author: aquette
> Date: Fri Feb 1 23:11:33 2008
> New Revision: 1264
>
> Log:
> fix HAL support installation [Alioth Bug #304156]
Arnaud,
I tried to fix some of the errors that I was seeing in buildbot, but I
still get the following error on "make distcheck", and I don't know
how
2005 Sep 16
1
recent and planned changes
* I committed into CVS the gendb patch that I sent to the mailing list
on September 12. Arnaud, I hope you approve of this patch; it is
more reliable than the previous method in tracking the correct
dependencies.
* This, together with some other minor recent changes on the
Development branch, is between the "before_PSE_3" and "after_PSE_3"
tags. Arnaud: if you
2011 Jun 22
1
[nut-commits] buildbot failure in Network UPS Tools on Ubuntu-maverick-x86
>
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-maverick-x86 on
> Network UPS Tools.
> Full details are available at:
> http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/Ubuntu-maverick-x86/builds/32
>
> Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/
>
> Buildslave for this Build: cayenne
Fred,
I had a few spare cycles and tried building
2006 May 20
1
building a library for common/ [was: minor building issues (svn HEAD revision 427)]
NUT developers,
I'm looking for a low-tech solution for this linker error:
> gcc -I../include -O -Wall -Wsign-compare -g -Dsolaris2
> -I/software/openssl-0.9.7_runtime/include -I.
> -I/software/netsnmp-5.3/include -o snmp-ups snmp-ups.o main.o dstate.o \
> ../common/state.o ../common/upsconf.o ../common/parseconf.o \
> ../common/common.o ../common/setenv.o
2016 Mar 29
6
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
Hi Sylvestre,
On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> I am working on it as we speak. Hopefully, most of the 3.8 & 3.9
> packages are going to be green by next week.
Any updates on that?
It appears that Precise repositories are now in order, but all the others
(and, most importantly, Trusty) are still not updated.
Also, 3.9 packages are not mentioned on the web page,
2007 Feb 16
2
Centralion Blazer 2000VA USB-HID
Hi again,
I've succeeded in compiling the svn trunk with the automake tools and wish
to say thank you to Charles Lepple for his help.
After fixing some parameters in the hotplug script I can now get access to
the UPS on /dev/usb/hiddev0 (I added productid and vendorid of my ups to the
usermap).
I've decided to try the newhidups driver with -x generic parameter and got
this response :
2016 Mar 09
2
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
Hi,
I'd like to ask what's the status of the Debian / Ubuntu repositories
linked from llvm.org, specifically http://llvm.org/apt/ ...
If the timestamps are correct, some of the repositories haven't been
updated for months. I've tried browsing them directly, and e.g. for Ubuntu
14.04 (Trusty), the newly released LLVM 3.8 is nowhere to be found, even
though it's advertised
2015 Jul 08
1
[Nut-upsuser] Nut-2.7.3 & gcc-3.3.6
Hi Charles,
Yes, it looks like my g++ does contain STL library which might be just my
specific case...
However, as a temporary solution I disabled nutclient in Makefile (please
find the file attached). And nut-2.7.3 can be compiled now.
Thanks,
Sergey
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Sergey Talchuk
2016 Mar 09
2
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 and
> 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it might need
> more work for old Ubuntu (back port of cmake)
Hi Sylvestre,
Thank you for the clarification! Any ETAs on when the APT repositories are
going to be updated with LLVM 3.8 & 3.9 builds?
2008 Apr 30
0
[Fwd: Re: openSUSE 11.0 - NUT]
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> Please note that 2.2.2-pre3 installs hald addons by default to / on
> openSUSE 11.0 beta 2 x86_64. Not a big problem.
Here is a patch, which fixes openSUSE 11.0 beta 2 x86_64:
--- m4/nut_check_libhal.m4
+++ m4/nut_check_libhal.m4
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
dnl As per HAL spec, ?5 Callouts and ?2 Device Information Files
dnl - addon install path: $libdir/hal
2016 Mar 12
4
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Le 09/03/2016 à 21:44, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit :
> > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> >
> >> This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8
> >> and 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it
>
2016 Mar 12
0
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
Le 12/03/2016 à 14:15, Johan Engelen a écrit :
>
>
> > I'm not sure how clean / dirty of a solution you'd be okay with, but
> > I'd just point out that CMake developers provide working binary
> > tarballs for Linux with every release at
> https://cmake.org/download/ .
> > So, if you are not a purist and/or need the CMake backport for