similar to: Siemens Series A?

I have a V96 and have access to a V92 ON series UPS. I can tell you right off the oneac drivers don't see the family OZ with V96 responds with. I'd be willing to help out with this driver as I have a data center full of them plus one at home. However my C is weak. William

Hi, We have 2 UPS Chloride 80 NET 120 ( a black and white one ) in our datacenter. Could you please tell me if it is possible to use upsmon or other free solution with these two UPS for shuting down servers during electrical lost power before battery crash . Beet regards, Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

In order to get the Oneac UPS (models ON700XAU, ON1000XAU, ON1500XAU) to work with NUT, I had to make a few minor modifications to the oneac driver. I've attached a patch with all the modifications. I tried to ensure that my modifications would not break any existing functionality, but I could not be sure without a legacy Oneac UPS to test against. In my investigation, I found out that the

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:02:14 +0100 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, > > Does anyone know more if this is adressed or point me to the bug > report? There should be one, but i cant find it. > > Im finding the following again, tested with samba 4.4.5, now samba > 4.5.3. These reports go back to the year 2013. > I

Please use reply-all to keep the discussion on the list. On May 29, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Zena Bingani <rogerndo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes my two 120 kva UPS ( Chloride 80 Net 120 ) are newer than the entry in the compatibility list. > > Their windows monitoring software is Chloride MopUps P/R. > > It uses these protocols : RCCMD ( that is more interesting )

Hai, Does anyone know more if this is adressed or point me to the bug report? There should be one, but i cant find it. Im finding the following again, tested with samba 4.4.5, now samba 4.5.3. These reports go back to the year 2013. I searched in my mail samba folder for S-1-5-18 The problem. I create a "computer" Scheduled task. Now this task MUST run as : SYSTEM (S-1-5-18)

On Jan 22, 2019, at 4:37 PM, Phil Stracchino <phils at caerllewys.net> wrote: > Is there any practical benefit to getting the SNMP network card for it > unless I plan to monitor it via SNMP, or can any monitoring and > management I need to do be done perfectly well via serial, as on my APCs? For CyberPower, a SNMP card might be your best bet. I don't have specific experience

I'm looking at switching from an APC UPS to a different brand after having had my third SU3000RM in a row blow up power transistors. I'm looking at the Cyperpower PR3000LCDRTXL2U. I see the PR3000E and the PR6000LCDRTXL5U listed as supported, but not the PR3000LCDRTXL2U. Howeverit seems likely that if the PR6000LCDRTXL5U is supported, the PR3000LCDRTXL2U ought to work as well. I've

Editing the xml.. results in same error. ( which is logical ) The exact event from windows. Eventlog info: Source : Group Policy Scheduled Tasks. ID : 4098 USER : SYSTEM Error code : Group Policy object did not apply because it failed with error code '0x80070534 No mapping between account names and security IDs was done.' This error was suppressed. So I'll wait until this