Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Network UPS Tools version 2.2.2-pre2 released"
2009 May 08
1
Battery test feature of APC Back-UPS RS series
Hi all,
I use an APC Back-UPS RS 800, overall my experience with NUT is very
good but there is one feature I am missing: the ability to ask the UPS
for a battery test. upscmd -l shows the following commands available:
$ upscmd -l rs800
Instant commands supported on UPS [rs800]:
beeper.disable - Disable the UPS beeper
beeper.enable - Enable the UPS beeper
beeper.mute - Temporarily mute the UPS
2006 Feb 06
2
2.0.3-pre2: Spurious UPS UPS@localhost battery is low ?
Hi there,
[ http://www.contribs.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=654 ]
I just received this:
Broadcast message from nut (Sat Feb 4 04:02:45 2006):
UPS UPS@localhost battery is low
and
Feb 4 04:02:45 bigted upsmon[11532]: UPS UPS@localhost battery is low
Feb 4 04:02:45 bigted wall[4032]: wall: user nut broadcasted 1 lines (34
chars)
but I believe this looks o.k., except for the input voltage
2005 Jun 16
4
SYSLINUX 3.09-pre2: release candidate
It appears that increasing the command line limit to 1023 caused the
.bss memory area to overflow. Unfortunately NASM didn't detect this as
it ought to have and therefore I didn't catch it as an error.
I have dropped the command line limit to 511 characters and released it
as 3.09-pre2. This is a release candidate; please test it out and if it
works I'll make it 3.09.
-hpa
2009 Nov 27
3
HDT 0.3.6-pre2 is out !
The -pre2 version of HDT 0.3.6 is out.
Gert was a great source of motivation for making that -pre2.
He found many bugs and gave nice ideas.
Thanks Gert for your time and your _many_ tests.
This release will be more or less what will be included in the incoming
syslinux 3.84.
Since -pre1, here come the Changelog
* Reporting CPU L1 & L2 cache
* Report "Hw.Virt" in cpu
2009 Nov 27
3
HDT 0.3.6-pre2 is out !
The -pre2 version of HDT 0.3.6 is out.
Gert was a great source of motivation for making that -pre2.
He found many bugs and gave nice ideas.
Thanks Gert for your time and your _many_ tests.
This release will be more or less what will be included in the incoming
syslinux 3.84.
Since -pre1, here come the Changelog
* Reporting CPU L1 & L2 cache
* Report "Hw.Virt" in cpu
2004 May 18
2
SYSLINUX 2.10-pre2 is out
I have released SYSLINUX 2.10-pre2. I *really* would like testing
reports for this one, especially ISOLINUX, since I've included Knut
Petersen's fix for Award BIOSes...
Changes in 2.10:
* MEMDISK: Handle images compressed with zip as well as with
gzip. Some Windows-based image tools apparently generate
these kinds of images by default. Patch by Patrick
2009 Nov 01
1
HDT 0.3.5-pre2
The -pre2 release of HDT 0.3.5 is out.
The changelog from the previous release is :
- Adding pci.ids in the hdt.iso
- Fixing misdetection of Syslinux & Grub MBRs
- 'make hdt.img.gz' now generates a gzipped version of the floppy image
- Fixing some typo
- Adding & enhancing SMI detection
- Resetting cursor position when exiting the menu mode
- Inactive items are now brighter to
2007 Jan 17
3
Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r746 - trunk/packaging/RedHat
With automake, we collectively need to check to see if 'make
distcheck' still works after adding or removing files. Basically,
nothing will make its way into the NUT distribution tarball unless it
is somehow mentioned in one of the Makefile.am files. See the
packaging/RedHat directory for an example.
Niels, thank you for spotting the extra nut.spec file in SVN; however,
it needs to be
2013 Jul 08
3
Syslinux-6.02-pre2 - booting 32-bit kernels from efi64
I just released 6.02-pre2 which includes support for booting 32-bit
kernels from efi64. I know a number of people wanted this feature, so
hopefully it will be tested in various environments.
One thing to note is that it is not possible to boot a 32-bit kernel
from efi64 via the EFI handover protocol (or from firmware via the EFI
boot stub), but the kernel loader in Syslinux is smart enough to
2019 Feb 07
2
syslinux-6.04-pre2
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:35 PM H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux
<syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/6/19 9:17 AM, Joakim Tjernlund via Syslinux wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 16:00 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 14:07 -0800, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
> >>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
2019 Feb 06
4
syslinux-6.04-pre2
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 16:00 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 14:07 -0800, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It has been the case for
2019 Feb 05
6
syslinux-6.04-pre2
Hi all,
It has been the case for quite a while that the master tree is
unambiguously better than 6.03. I have thus tagged and pushed out a
syslinux-6.04-pre2 release, however, due to the issues with continuing
to keep the main archive on kernel.org, I have moved the release archive to:
https://www.zytor.com/pub/syslinux/
Other than the URL, there is no difference from the kernel.org archive.
2008 Oct 13
1
SYSLINUX 3.73-pre2 (release candidate)
I have just pushed out SYSLINUX 3.73-pre2. This prerelease adds support
for the fact that the ACPI 3 definition changes the E820 memory
detection spec in an incompatible(!!!) manner.
Please test it out, as I'd really like to push a 3.73 out as soon as
possible.
-hpa
2006 Jan 31
1
Thank you - newhidups (2.03-pre2) works with my APC BackUPS ES 500
Hi there,
I'm one of the maintainers of the SME Server distro (www.contribs.org)
and we've been chasing this one for some time:
http://www.contribs.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=352
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2006-January/000543.html
Many thanks to Peter Selinger and everyone else who helped with the
debugging and patches.
Thanks,
Gordon
2019 Feb 07
2
syslinux-6.04-pre2
On 2/7/19 4:03 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I merged your tree and added the install patch on top of it. Thank you!
>>>
>>> -hpa
>>
>> Is it worth doing another -pre immediately since upgrading gnu-efi
>> took such a large leap? My thought is if someone has an issue with
>> the new proposed
2014 Oct 09
3
configure: error: "Net-SNMP Libraries not found, required for SNMP drivers"
System:
* Solaris 10 1/13 (X86) in VirtualBox.
OpenCSW packages installed:
*gcc4core
* libltdl7
* netsnmp
* netsnmp_dev
I'm attempting to run:
./configure --with-snmp --with-wrap --with-snmp-libs="L/opt/csw/lib
l/libnetsnmp"
And get the following error:
configure: error: "Net-SNMP libraries not found, required for SNMP
drivers"
I'm pasting the whole
2010 Sep 30
1
Getting "Error: No such host" and [ERR ACCESS-DENIED]
I'm using NUT 2.4.1 with openSUSE 11.2, my UPS is an MGE/Eaton
Ellipse ASR 1500 USBS. The set-up is as described at
http://rogerprice.org/NUT.html.
Since NUT uses TCP wrappers, I have the /etc/hosts.allow entry
upsd : 10.0.0/24, localhost, LOCAL, 127.0.0.1 : ALLOW
When I pull the plug from the wall to test my setup, I get the
sequence of KDE notifications and finally a
2019 Feb 06
4
syslinux-6.04-pre2
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 11:34 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 2/6/19 9:17 AM, Joakim Tjernlund via Syslinux wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 16:00 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 14:07 -0800, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:
> > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments
2004 Feb 02
10
SYSLINUX 2.09-pre2
This version contains a fix to mbr.asm, plus a version of Murali's menu
system, but ported to gcc. Although gcc produces much bigger 16-bit
code (since it's really 32-bit code with prefixes) I figured it would be
much easier for people to deal with since it requires the configuration
to be compiled in.
That being said, it's a *very* powerful menu system, partially *because*
2006 Feb 08
2
2.0.3-pre2: Spurious UPS UPS@localhost battery is
Peter Selinger wrote:
> Hm. I need more information, as NUT seems to garble the values even
> before I can see them. I am not so worried about the date and
> temperatures (although, strangely, the battery replacement date
> appears to be Sept 25, 2001, which makes no sense). But the voltage is
> definitely important.
>
> [...]
>
Thanks Peter - I'll send the new