Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Enhancing snmp mib"
2007 Jul 13
0
asterisk snmp
Hello,
I'm trying to monitor asterisk with snmp.
I'm using asterisk 1.4.4 compiled with res_snmp on a debian stable:
*CLI> module show like snmp
Module Description Use Count
res_snmp.so SNMP [Sub]Agent for Asterisk 0
I've configured asterisk in res_snmp.conf:
[general]
subagent = yes
enabled = yes
and when asterisk start print
2007 Feb 25
1
Marks SNMP HowTo
I followed Marks SNMP howto on Voip Magazine and ran into a small
problem... (http://www.voip-magazine.com/content/view/2877/0/1/3/)
When asterisk is running as a non-root user (asterisk) SNMP request
for for the Asterisk MIB tree return nothing. If I quit asterisk and
run it as root, all is fine. Does anyone have a idea what is going
on? I have never used agentX, so I am unsure of what it is
2006 Apr 01
2
Install problem with res_snmp.so from current trunk (bug?)
Just updated two fc3 systems running svn trunk. One updated, installed
properly, and is working fine. The second box failed during the 'make
install' process with:
/usr/lib/libnetsnmp.a(parse.o)(.text+0x275a): In function `unload_module':
: multiple definition of `unload_module'
res_snmp.o(.text+0x310):/usr/src/asterisk/res/res_snmp.c:102: first
defined here
/usr/bin/ld:
2006 Jun 07
1
asterisk-1.2.9 / res_snmp.so
--- hgaillac-sip@yahoo.fr a ?crit :
> hello,
>
> How asterisk could support res_snmp even this module
> don't help to monitor all asterisk features?
>
> monitoring asterisk with snmp would be a good
> thing.
> Which solution ?
>
> Harry
> --- Kristian Kielhofner <kris@krisk.org> a ?crit :
>
> > hgaillac-sip@yahoo.fr wrote:
> > > I
2006 May 13
0
RE: snmp and asterisk
I use res_snmp.so with asterisk do you provide mib
--- David Yat Sin <davidy@sangoma.com> a ?crit :
> Hi Harry,
> The Sangoma Card when used for TDM Voice will work
> under zaptel, so you
> would need to perform the SNMP through Asterisk.
>
> Regards,
> David Yat Sin
> Sangoma Technologies
> (905) 474 1990 x119
> (800) 388 2475 x199
> MSN:
2007 Feb 02
1
1.4 res_snmp dependencies (Debian)
I'm having trouble building res_snmp (under Asterisk 1.4.0) on a box
running Debian Sarge. res_snmp says its dependencies are netsnmp but
Debian doesn't seem to have a netsnmp package. I've tried installing
pretty much every package available related to snmp and no luck. I'm
just wondering if anyone has successfully built the res_snmp module
under Debian Sarge stable. Any
2009 Mar 12
4
log to cdr each dialpan action, not only one record for each call
Hi to all.
What can i do if a customer needs to log in the CDR all the dialpan
actions related to a call?
I mean, not only the lastapp e the lastdata but all the dialpan actions!
I know that the actual CDR system store one record for each call (and
for billing purposes this can be correct) but in some cases the
approach needed is something similar to the queue_log.
I know that exists ResetCDR
2007 Sep 12
1
res_snmp
Hi,
I have problems compiling asterisk 1.4.11 with res_snmp.
I do 'make menuselect', and I see that this resource module depends on netsnmp.
I am using centOS 4.5.
I do:
> yum install net-snmp net-snmp-devel net-snmp-utils net-snmp-libs
I don't know if i am missing something.
I go to the source directory and I do:
./configure
but still does not work:
> ...
> checking for
2006 Apr 26
0
Help! * Won't Start after SVN Trunk Update - SuSE 10
Hi:
I deleted old modules in /usr/lib/asterisk/modules
before make install. I built zaptel and libpri before
asterisk. Modprobe zaptel and modprobe -v wctdm
executed witiout complaint. Also, ztcfg shows 4
channels configured, as it should. Starting asterisk
produced the output below with several warnings and a
failure. Can someone help, please. I double-spaced
the warnings in the text below
2006 May 10
2
asterisk monitoring / res_snmp
Hello,
I 've installed both cacti and res_snmp for
monitoring.
Does res_snmp is able to send snmp traps when hardware
is out of service or others status ?
Harry
___________________________________________________________________________
Faites de Yahoo! votre page d'accueil sur le web pour retrouver directement vos services pr?f?r?s : v?rifiez vos nouveaux mails, lancez vos
2006 Oct 11
0
Asterisk 1.4.0 compile error on AMD64 Opteron server; recompile with -fPIC?
Hi,
Installed 1.4.0 libpri and 1.4.0 zaptel and everything went smoothly. I configured asterisk 1.4.0 with no problems (./configure), but when I compile it (make), it fails with this error:
[LD] res_snmp.o snmp/agent.o -> res_snmp.so
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/libz.a(gzio.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile
2006 Apr 20
3
Asterisk Won't start after SVN Trunk Update
Hi:
I deleted old modules in /usr/lib/asterisk/modules
before make install. I built zaptel and libpri before
asterisk. Modprobe zaptel and modprobe -v wctdm
executed witiout complaint. Starting asterisk
produced the output below with several warnings and a
failure. Can someone help, please. I double-spaced
the warnings in the text below. The first warning is
about music on hold because it
2007 Jun 20
0
asterisk + mediant 2000
Dear All
I am new in this list right now i am working on asterisk server and deploying asterisk PBX in my organization now i have alread setup Avaya PBX and i want to intergrate my asterisk through mediant 2000
[asterisk]-----[mediant 2k]--------E1-trunk------[Avaya]
this is my setup now i want to create dialpan so how to forward call in to existing avaya setup means i have not
2017 Oct 31
0
Updating snmp-mib.c with new Cyberpower v2.0 MIB
On October 31, 2017 2:32:36 AM GMT+01:00, Ben Kamen <ben at benkamen.net> wrote:
>Hey all,
>
>
>?I'm feeling spunky... and want to update nut to handle the new v2.0
>MIB from CyberPower.
>
>I've looked at the cyberpower v0.1 .c/.h and being new to working on
>nut to this level -- anything anyone has to offer on adding code
>besides the obvious?
>
2017 Nov 02
0
Updating snmp-mib.c with new Cyberpower v2.0 MIB
On November 2, 2017 5:31:42 AM GMT+01:00, Ben Kamen <ben at benkamen.net> wrote:
>On 10/31/2017 01:13 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
>> If the new data is in a separate OID tree, it can quite be a new MIB.
>Otherwise you can use the UNIQUE flag and set the preferred (e.g.
>newer, more precise) source for a value first in the list of same-named
>mappings in existing file - if
2017 Nov 02
2
Updating snmp-mib.c with new Cyberpower v2.0 MIB
On 11/02/2017 01:52 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
>
> I believe the main reason for a new set of .c/.h files here would be if the new MIB is defined in a separate subtree. The top-level mapping binds the vendor entry OIDs (often "hidden" so one has to know where to poke). It may also be higher in the list of snmp-ups.h, in case the device also serves the older MIB but you'd prefer the
2017 Nov 06
0
Updating snmp-mib.c with new Cyberpower v2.0 MIB
Chugging along...
Question for the gang --
CyberPower lists other items in their MIB for controlling PD units and some other things.
Does NUT support all that and should I make an effort to get all that in or should we skip for now and get UPS primary ingredients inserted and tested?
just wondering,
?-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
2006 May 23
1
res_snmp
I know that I asked this before:
I need to add res_snmp to a working 1.2.7.
Can I add it to the res directory, modify their makefile and compile
everything again?
When I tried to install everything from svn, I got messages like my zaptel
is too old, and also the same for libpri.
By the way, if you download from trunk, everything is the same download
following the web page
2017 Oct 31
2
Updating snmp-mib.c with new Cyberpower v2.0 MIB
Hey all,
?I'm feeling spunky... and want to update nut to handle the new v2.0 MIB from CyberPower.
I've looked at the cyberpower v0.1 .c/.h and being new to working on nut to this level -- anything anyone has to offer on adding code besides the obvious?
like: should the 0.1 and 2.0 coexist somehow? (maybe different files)
(also, is there a list of all the parms I can match up from the
2017 Nov 02
2
Updating snmp-mib.c with new Cyberpower v2.0 MIB
On 10/31/2017 01:13 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> If the new data is in a separate OID tree, it can quite be a new MIB. Otherwise you can use the UNIQUE flag and set the preferred (e.g. newer, more precise) source for a value first in the list of same-named mappings in existing file - if there's a hit on an actual device, it will be used and not iterated onwards. The flag is not yet supported for